I created a theory ("Gravitational theory of life") that tries to link the scientific formalism with the way it is generated: by the " life form" in the first place and by "intelligent life form", in the second row.
The "Body" is an "order" (non material), in time and space, with a certain support.
His material part (which is "seen") is only that support for this "order". Evidence in this regard is that the contact between its material base (of the "order") and the environment(also "material"), a process that obeys the laws of the interaction, of "transformation", the "order" ("form") in time and space of bodies ( interrelationship "function-> relative position" of the processes that constitute them) remains unchanged (within certain limits) despite these contacts.
"Gravitational theory of life" trying to solve the problem of generation in space and
time and preservation of the resulting geometrical disposition of the bodies, because:
1) in animal cell, the flows of high intensity (mass, ionic) occur before the equilibrium areas, which means "structure". I mean there is a "flow", which initially did rely on "nothing", but nevertheless, it is perfectly oriented in space and time. And
FURTHER cellular structure is only a consequence of statistical equilibrium occurring in the contact zone of the routes of these "flows".
An attempt to solve this problem did Ilya Prigogine, Belgian scholar of Russian origin,the Nobel laureate.
In "Gravitational Theory of Life" is a critical analysis of Prigogine's approaches (as tried and Romanian-born American scientist Adrian Bejan in the 90s in "CONSTRUCTAL" theory ). Constructal Law, issued by Adrian Bejan says:
"For a finite-size (flow) system to persist in time (to live), its configuration must evolve such that it provides easier access to the imposed currents that flow through it."
The meaning of this formulation is that a fluid, in order to (auto) preserving flow (equivalent for Bejan to "life") should flowing on where is "correct" (in geometrical sense).
Why Bejan contradicts Prigogine's theory? For ordinate this flow in space and time, Prigogine suggests that necessary actions must comes from outside the system. But in this case Prigogine had to "build" some poly of entropy (differences in
temperature, pressure, etc.) between that occurr the "flow", in the living cell. And this poly does not exist in nature (in most cases the environment around a cell is homogeneous and isotropic). And Bejan, sensing that "forcing" says: "No! The flows
must to orient themselves independently, based on this law, which, by his nature, is statistic, "the constructal law".
According to the "gravitational theory of life" both are right and, paradoxically, both wrong:
a) Prigogine is right: imposing entropic polarizations and ordering the flow, in space and time (flow), by actions which comes from the outside. But if exist such imposition, of material nature, that kind of hypothesis contradicts the independent
motion (against any entropic polarization) of the living systems. The fact actually "charged" by Bejan.
b) Now: if the "flow" would meet to the "constructal law", the stable flow ( means "life") should be independent but, implicitly, would occur spontaneously: "Life" should have and other sources than "life" itself. What is not found.
Solution of "Gravitational Theory of Life" is: "a way of imposing flow must coming from outward, and which must have an informational nature, which overlaps the scalar ( fixed) information from in of the DNA. That mean gravitational and inertial actions plus a "text". In this theory is accepted that the gravitational influences (primarily from the solar system bodies, ordered by relative motion between them, including the Earth) do not have a material nature (until proven otherwise, the experimental discovery of the particle generating the gravitational field, "graviton? and the gravitational wave).
For this reason the nature of imposition of the flow in the cell is not causal!
2) In complex body, the nature of parameters which can ordering in space and time these dynamic processes implies the existence of "vectors" which DNA can not
contain. Also resulting in an apparent state of structural equilibrium, also, is circumvented the principle of causality in the processes which take place simultaneously.
So: the body (at large) is not a consequence of a causally interrelated phenomena!
The "order" (stable interrelationship "function->relative position" of the structural parts) shall be preserved permanently (for a healthy body). It follows that, in a sense, the action of an external stimulus, which automatically tends to "spoil" this
order, is destroyed in a timely manner.
EXAMPLE: variability in time of antibody.
A step in deciphering this phenomenon was a development, in 1965, of a model of recombination of genes, so that multiple genes, and not always the same, give rise to a protein chain according to the principle "more gene - one protein " by William
Dreyer and Claude Bennett. In fact, not one but an infinite number of variations of the same protein.
This model was verified experimentally ( in laboratory conditions) by Susumu Tonegawa, Nobel laureate in 1987.
But there are serious reservations regarding its operation under real conditions (in vivo). "Given the slow evolution in time (reflected by latency ?) of these processes, how do you explain that a foreign substance is recognized almost instantaneously,
and the body may starts already making the appropriate antibodies ?" - Karen Bulloch - University of San Diego, 1978.
Any biological causal chain involves a latency ?, as follows:
A biological system, regardless of its complexity, can be defined by a linear operator
, which acts on some input quantities ui and generate the outputs yj, according to the expression:
yj (t + ?) =
ui (t)
Where t is time and ? is the latency of biosystem. Then, by what mechanism, such kind of a processes, can give almost instant response? It is known that the complex interrelationship between the structures of "evoluated" bodies (tissue, organ, body) have a form of "CLOSED CAUSAL CHAIN": Francois Jacob - Nobel laureate for genetics said:" ... each component (of life systems) becomes for the other its own condition of existence, equally cause and effect. "
But a "closed causal chain" of the processes (process "1" generated process "2", process "2" generated process "3" and so on, and at last process "n" generated the first process "1"), if it's followed by a state of stability (we found this on organisms), involves the simultaneous development of each of these processes (which it transform in "CLOSED ORDERED CHAIN"). Or, their chemical nature, burdened by a latency ( slow evolution in time), and so, certain cell produces a certain amount of substance in a given period, make that some structures will can not operate simultaneous, for lack of "raw material".
Or, in the body, all structures must function simultaneously, so that the flow of the substance which functional unites them to be continuous and closed. It follows that some cells must begin working before receiving "raw material" from previous
functional cells, based on a quantity of substance which is available for processing in his very structure. This mechanism could be the explanation of the intern synthesis process (biosynthesis) for necessary substances in metabolism, independently of the process of assimilation of food, from outside.
Handy command for the very moment when this phenomenon must take place must have a "support" more "rapid" than a chemical process (the "latency" high). He must be an electrical signal. Vegetative (autonomic) nervous system role is to
provide such synchronization signals of chemical processes at the contact of the structures (sensitive and effectors) with environment. The result of synchronization is a continuous mass flow between the different structures of the body which
provides geometric and functional stability.
If in a "links" of the "chain" that supports an external stimulus, and that flow tends to be interrupt because of this stimulus ( means "dead" ), but not "mechanically" but "informational" interrupting (repetitions with intervals shorter than "latency" of such chemical processes, which, default, is forced to consume more) then, the following functional structures may remain without "material" (even without the quantity of substance from his own structure which is for maintain simultaneity of processes).
Under the electrical impulses pressure that forces them to work on and in this kind of conditions they come to destroy their own internal functional structure (the one that gives them the "function" ) turning them into malignant cells (cancer).
So the electrical signals that provide simultaneous processes in the body, under certain conditions, forcing some structures to operate in a specific way, initially it is useful for body (to avoid the spontaneous collapsing under the action of certain types
of stimulus, informational organized ).
So, the tumor is an independent organism ( from his host). He is intelligent, he can take decisions, he can adapt at the specifics external stimulus (treatments or action of immunologic system). This coordinated tip of behavior of malign cells is facilitated by the connection of the tumor with the nerves of autonomic nervous system ( which offer a rich informational support and which exist- the connection- in all situations, known or not by the medicine).
So, the principle of a method (for cure the cancer) is that: the tumor mast be isolated by the influence of activity of the nerves (cutting the nerve or stop the electrochemical signals circulation influence from synapses to the tumor by activity
of a neurotoxin-see American patent: Pub. No. : US 2005/0031648 A1; Pub Date: Feb. 10, 2005). Main and Prehn have performed such experiments in 1957 ( they
pull out the tumor and pull in the same tumor to the same animal) with promising
results. But they follow a different theoretical idea (the existence of a specific tumor antigen).
There is a material which shows that the results of Main and Prehn experiences ( the specific immune response of the organism for tumor) have not had, until now, an
accepted explanation .
I can put at disposal for anyone interested a treatment solution that complies with
the principles set forth above and which most probably has not been used nowhere
in the world.
Gabriel Pascu;(physics engineer) mail: pascu_gabriel2002@yahoo.com; phone: +40733846532
Unlike normal cells, cancer cells can grow and age without dying — one of the reasons they’re so dangerous. But researchers at Washington State University have developed a way to help cancer cells age and die, which could lead to treatment that slows or stops tumor growth.
