Follow this blog:
RSS

WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines

By | July 2, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

Every day since April 20th, we’ve been shown what can happen when something goes terribly wrong on a deep-sea, floating oil rig. But what about a deep-sea, floating wind turbine? Would it topple?

According to a recent feasibility study published in the Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, the answer is no.

Engineers Dominique Roddier and Christian Cermelli at Marine Innovation and Technology showed that their buoyant, triangular platform, dubbed WindFloat, could support a 5-megawatt wind turbine. That’s a big turbine, and they conducted the research on a model at a much smaller scale. Even so, the world just might see the real thing floating off the Portuguese coast in 2012.

Energias de Portugal (EDP) and Principle Power, a Seattle-based company that owns WindFloat’s licensing, agreed last year to construct a prototype onshore, haul into waters more than 164 feet deep, and moor it to the ocean floor with cables. The three legs of the platform, set 115 feet apart, will feature a closed-loop ballast system and 80-foot-wide horizontal plates to counteract ocean’s movement and hopefully, keep the platform level and the windmill upright.

Innovations, a publication of Berkeley University (alma mater of Roddier and Cermelli), quotes EDP Project Engineer Pedro Valverde:

The WindFloat platform was based on previous work for the oil and gas industry, and those results showed that, after scaling properly, it could be coupled with a wind turbine. According to the previous work developed and the proven concept, EDP had no doubts about choosing this technology.

If successful, the joint project Windplus S.A. could turn into a 150-megawatt floating wind farm. Oh, and while they’re at it, Principle Power is working with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory to add wave power tech to their platform.

But WindFloat isn’t the only deepwater turbine prototype floating around. Shown to the right are others: (from top left, clockwise) HyWind, Blue H, WindSea and SWAY.

A working, and economically reasonable, farm version of these designs could extend the wind industry’s reach to places not suitable for standing seabed turbines, which need shallower ocean depths. Far offshore wind farms might also avoid lengthy legal battles concerning ocean views similar to those that stalled Massachusetts’ Cape Wind project. With greater geographic flexibility, the floating farm operators could also feasibly choose areas not known for bird or marine mammal migrations. Steering clear of shipping channels and fishing grounds would also be a good idea.

The video below depicts the set up of a potential WindFloat farm.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
Good article! . . ..informative and insiteful. Too bad it's all a bunch of bologna!
Posted by CaptnPlanet
6th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
While a man made floating island may have some positive benefits. How will whales and flying birds not end up as chum or tangled in the support and power cables? What is the electrical losses of a cable 10 miles or more from land from a grid of 15MWH generators?
Posted by emc2mm@...
13th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
Will these things ever pay for themselves? The land based turbines need to be subsidized which means that the taxpayers are really paying for them. One design issue not mentioned here is the gyroscopic effect of the rotating blades. They are going to resist any upsetting movement (like wave action) very strongly and likely fracture the tower or rip the power heard right off if they are not a lot stronger (more expensive) than land based ones. I think this is another "green" boondoggle which will make a few folks rich and cost everybody else.
Posted by RickL71
13th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
first... long distance HVDC Transmission!.. look at NorNed, Its 360 miles long and capable of carrying 750 megawatts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NorNed

AC to HVDC is probably what the offshore control platform is for.. why cant we just generate DC and avoid having to convert the power from AC to DC and then back to AC once it gets to land.

The longest HVDC transmission line is over 1k miles and is capable of carrying 560 MW. It is not underwater, but surely 360 miles offshore would be plenty distance to make any turbine hater happy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inga-Shaba
As for the gyroscopic effect of rotating blades.. I'm no engineer but dont they just shut down turbines when they reach certain speeds? why wouldn't they also have the ability to shut down the turbines when wave conditions reach unsafe conditions? why build it stronger when you can just shut it off.

This is once again, another use for the offshore platform, and another use for it is maintenance personnel for the turbines themselves. keeping any power source maintained is part of its reliability.

Search is a wonderful thing (a corporation has already thought up most of what I said about HVDC)
http://www.abb.com/cawp/gad02181/18e68b778f900952c1256e4b002b25be.aspx

We haven't gotten to a point that these things are our only power source and they never will be. We have to diversify the power sources to get reliable energy. We dont even feel safe with just one power generation station now with our current power grid. Stop hating and start thinking ahead. One of the best power systems in my area is a City owned power system. The property owners in the city own it. It is then run by the power authority. It was funded by taxpayer dollars. Deal with it. They're going to spend our money, we may as well get something useful from it and save a little, or at least stabilize our power costs.
Posted by t0cableguy
15th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
@emc2mm
also.. we've been running cables under the ocean for decades now, at least half a century, fish and marine wildlife are not blind.
and as for the birds, what happens when they hit your windshield fly into your window at home, or hit that skyscraper downtown or when a fish gets caught up in the water intake of a large powerplant that draws its water from a lake, river or ocean? did you care when you built your house whether a bird lived in a tree that was cut down to clear your lot or a tree that was harvested to construct your home? Everything we do is bad, there's also a lot of good to be drawn from wind power.
Posted by t0cableguy
15th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
I find that a light turbine suspended below a blimp (moored onto the
sea floor), would be a much better idea. Less maintenance (e.g.
seawater corrosion), and less danger of ship collision.

heri16
Posted by evofx
15th Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: WindFloat: deepwater, floating wind turbines
> Would it topple?

The real question: Would it actually generate any useful power at all compared to the ridiculously overblown costs of
a) construction
b) site implementation
c) long-distance underwater cabling ( how, exactly, did you plan to get this power back to land? )
d) maintenance

Wind power, like solar, is a total pipe dream. It will NEVER be cost effective when you consider total-cycle expenses, from creation to destruction. It generally won't even "break even", but it will never be even vaguely cost-comparable to ANY currently available power generation system.

With the vaguely possible exception of OTEC, the exact same thing can be said for solar.
Posted by O Bloody Hell
15th Jul 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!