Follow this blog:
RSS

Wind energy ‘pipeline’ from Texas to the Southeast

By | September 22, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

Texas leads the nation in wind power, with more than 9,700 operating wind turbines. The southeastern United States? Not nearly as many.

But Pattern Energy Group aims to send these less gusty states some of the power generated by strong Texan winds.

They are proposing to build a 400-mile transmission line from Texas to northeastern Mississippi. From there, Southern Cross transmission line would break out to potentially deliver power to three utilities (possibly Tennessee Valley Authority, Southern Company, and Entergy Corp) serving ten southern states. In this scenario, a home in Atlanta could receive wind electricity from Texas.

The current Texas grid constraints, however, keep all such power in Texas.

ERCOT’s multi-billion dollar initiative to expand transmission within Texas is currently underway in the hopes of almost doubling the state’s wind capacity to 18,000 megawatts by 2013. The cost to electricity consumers of such transmission investments, the American Wind Energy Association contends, would become negligible when spread over time and a broader area.

By 2016 the $1 billion Southern Cross project, according to Pattern Energy, could free up grid congestion and help the wind industry grow by allowing it to sell the power across the border to the east.

Reuters reports:

While Texas has exceeded its renewable power target, Southeastern states have yet to set targets to boost use of renewable power to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fossil-fueled power plants.

Some utilities, however, expect federal mandates in the future. TVA, for example, built the first wind farm in the Southeast and seeks to buy 2,000 MW of wind generation over the next few years. Its 1,300 MW of wind power under contract so far will come from Illinois, Kansas, Iowa and the Dakotas where wind power is abundant.

While a national renewable energy standard would likely push things along, according to Pattern Energy’s David Parquet, it’s not essential to their project’s success.

Still, establishing new transmission paths and acquiring site permits can be difficult, and the company will need to get approval from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission for its Southern Cross line in order for it to go forward.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Image: Flickr/fieldsbh

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor, Energy

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
Hopefully, we will will share solar in the same manner in the future.
Posted by waderx
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
"While Texas has exceeded its renewable power target"

Just pointing out to all the high tax, low oppertunity, blue states that Texas rules. I don't know if this statistic is stil true but it was about 18 months ago.
Texas is number one in wind energy, and it produces more than the next 13 states (2-14) COMBINED. From a cost point of view wind is competitive with coal and natural gas in Texas. The only thing we need is more transmission lines.
Posted by ken325
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
Texas-
Numner one in wind energy.
Best State for Business 2010.
No personal income taxes.
Run by Republicans, not by unions and Democrats.

>> "The current Texas grid constraints, however, keep all such power in Texas"

There are three power grids in the U.S. - Eastern US, Western US, and Texas.

Want some energy? Wind? Natural gas? Oil? Ask Texas.
Posted by bb_apptix
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
The socialists will probably regulate away this success, too
Texas also produced more gas and petroleum than most states. This success was declared windfall profit, and the command economists levied taxes and mandated sale at a discount price to other states. Maybe it was prophetic that it was called windfall profit tax. I see a repeat of this coming.

Secession, anyone?
Posted by JimboNobody
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
my people! so sharing..plenty of Dems there too though happy
Posted by CbassNY
22nd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
This is dufus. There is no way that wind power can be more than a niche player in the energy market. The entire operation is heavily subsidized by taxpayers. Other wise it would flop. Texas has more wind power because the state mandates that a specific percent of all electrical energy produced must be from renewable sources, and we produce a lot of electrical energy here.

Nuclear and natural gas are the only feasible energy solutions. Get real!
Posted by boppa
22nd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
We only need the transmission lines
Just give us a few billion tax dollars to build those transmission lines. Then give us a few billion more to put up more wind turbines. Then everybody can dance around and throw daisies in the air singing about the cheap energy we have. Oh yeah, we have to maintain the darn things (with petroleum based lubricants), so throw in another billion or so just for good measure. Now for all those billions of dollars we've spent, we get Millions of dollars worth of cheap energy, Millions I tell ya ... I'm singing in the rain happy
Posted by ShortyStuff
22nd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
As a Texan, the comments about Texas re "Great place for
Business," "low tax" and "run by Republicans" are not germane
and inappropriate in this forum.

Those reasons have nothing to do with why Texas is number #1
in wind power. The real reasons are that we have lots of cheap
undeveloped land in areas with favorable geography and weather
patterns for moderate sustained winds perfect for generating electrical power.

I appreciate that Texans have a somewhat libertarian ideology.
What I don't appreciate is how due (partially) to our low and
inequitable tax scheme, we have one of the worst combined
school systems in the nation.

To get into political discussion unrelated to this blog, but related
to your comments- I don't appreciate how our boneheaded
Republican governor refuses to take federal funds as a political
statement because we must maintain that spending, when we as
a growing state will have to spend at that level or higher anyway. I
also don't appreciate how he allowed an innocent man to be
executed as a posturing stunt, and is trying to disrupt the
investigation into the events that allowed that to happen.

I could go on, but I'll stop.
Posted by colinnwn
22nd Sep 2010
-2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
Negligible, hmm, we recently heard (after hearings) that Cape Wind will double or triple the rates for Cape Cod ratepayers. Not such a good deal after all.
Posted by philwhite42@...
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
All of the high "tall" transmission lines should be designed with wind turbins to add to the power that "leaks" out from traveling the distance and add to the whole of the electric grid. This should happen in every state and wind turbins should be made here in the U.S.
Posted by jensmobil@...
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
Nuclear and natural gas the only feasable energy solutions???
Have you heard of electricity producing solar panels? Have you heard of the working wind power farms in the North Sea of Europe that are producing huge amounts of energy are being duplicated throughout the wind corridor of the south central USA? There are solar thermal plants that have been developed and are being refined that can use and store solar energy to produce electricity 24 hours a day. There are experimental and working geothermal plants that have been built to tap into the huge reservoir of thermal energy beneath the earth.

Natural gas burns cleaner than oil and coal but still produces greenhouse gasses. However, it is a good choice of energy until we have sufficient renewable energy capacity to replace it. Nuclear energy could be used, but nuclear plants are too expensive and potentially dangerous.

Our strategy should be to use all methods of energy production, using as much renewable energy as possible and supplementing it with natural gas, nuclear and as limited as possible, coal.

Building energy efficient "green" houses and retrofiting existing structures to make them more energy efficient is also a very important component in reducing our energy needs.

We have so many more options than just nuclear and natural gas.
Posted by EMCam
22nd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
Kind of a shame that USA is not the prime in manufacturing whole thing.
Posted by hmmmmm!
22nd Sep 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
Yep Ole Slim Pickins of swift boat finance back buying legislators and getting tax payers to foot the bills.
Posted by hmmmmm!
23rd Sep 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
Mostly Agree
I agree that that wind energy will not soon replace fossil fuels or nuclear. However T. Boone Pickins wouldn't be involved if there were no money in it. He projects replacing 30% of electricity need, so that natural gas can be used for cars. Nonetheless, let's do as much as we can to utilize renewable resources and reduce consumption, within reason.

Also agree that our (Texas) governor is a bonehead and a pretty-boy. But I'm glad that he didn't accept money that will obligate outflow of money to the federal government. I agree education could be better. But I'd rather pay for it directly than borrow from and be beholden to the revenuers.
Posted by JimboNobody
23rd Sep 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Wind energy 'pipeline' from Texas to the Southeast
About taking evil FED money in TX, and how the stalwart TX's are not doing such, nor any mention that TX has nearly worst health care, education and tax exempt upper end on planet,.. "TX now suing FEDs for $335 mil for education money?.. how can that be how can that be that "rich TX" needs money for education etc.
Posted by hmmmmm!
24th Sep 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Ignorance runs rampant
I do not understand why you are so upset that Texas is asking for money from the Fed. They are only asking for their fair share of money that Texas taxpayers have sent to Washington. You don't mention what state you are from but I bet it is one of those states that takes more from the FEDs than it sends to the FEDs. Your jealousy is showing. Texas is a kind-hearted state that took care of THOUSANDS of people from Loisianna when they were hit by the hurricane. They were not recompensed for it by the FEDS but they would do it again. That is because it is populated by great and compassionate people. You seem to take a few new soundbites and have formed an entire negative picture of Texas. Quit being a troll and go visit. If that does not change your mind then feel free to keep spilling angry, useless vitroil on these boards.

Texas laws tend to take care of Texas people without being unduly intrusive. Part of the reason Texas was not hit as hard by the housing crash is because we have laws that do not allow people to get screwed by mortgage companies. They are obviously doing something right.

I know that I am probably wasting my time writing to you. If you were really a reasonable person and actually cared that Texas does not have a great educational system you should be writing to the FEDs to send Texas education money.

hmmmmm!,...too cynical
Posted by seaczar
Updated - 1st Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!