Follow this blog:
RSS

What ’synthetic life’ could mean for the energy industry

By | May 21, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

Yesterday Andrew Nusca discussed how geneticists have duplicated life in an empty cell by adding lab-made DNA to it (see Scientists unveil first self-replicating, synthetic bacterial cell). The idea of synthesizing an organism (in this case, bacteria) from four bottles of chemicals via a computerized DNA code recipe is pretty mind-blowing.

Sorry, very mind-blowing.

J. Craig Venter Institute researchers published their work in the journal Science yesterday.

For what purposes we come to use—or not use—this technology will no doubt stir many philosophical, moral, legal and ethical pots. But this is an energy blog, so let’s discuss those possible implications.

The energy application spoken of most so far is the large-scale production of algae, which could potentially capture hydrocarbons and produce renewable algal biofuel. Algae is not a significant food source (for humans) so the biofuel would not compete directly with agriculture.

As a photosynthetic organism, algae thrives on sunlight and carbon dioxide. Taking waste CO2 from power plants and adding it to biomass production ponds or photobioreactors could give purpose to the pollution by helping nourish the algae. Burning the resulting biomass would release that CO2, which ideally would be captured and kept within the fuel production cycle.

Last summer ExxonMobil filed a contract with Synthetic Genomics Inc. to provide up to $600 million for algal fuel production. Founded by J. Craig Venter, the company has given $30 million toward this research since 2005.

Meanwhile, the are some who don’t think synthetic algae is necessary to create substitutes for natural crude oil.

Nicholas Wade reports in the New York Times:

Some [scientists] regard this approach as unpromising because it will take years to design new organisms, and meanwhile progress toward making biofuels is already being achieved with conventional genetic engineering approaches in which existing organisms are modified a few genes at a time.

10.8 million base pairs comprise the genome of the bacterium Mycoplasma mycoides, which the study replicated. Algae genomes would be longer.

Craig Venter discusses the research in a interview with the American Association for the Advancement of Science, mentioning possible energy applications around minute 4:30 in the video below:

Image: Electron micrograph via Tom Deerinck and Mark Ellisman, National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research, University of California at San Diego.
Via: Dot Earth

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: What 'synthetic life' could mean for the energy industry
This picture following my page scroll is annoying, is not your face, is just I feel like i'm forced to see a person's face constantly and it feels like it's watching me constantly. Kind of annoying, it should at least have an option to turn it off.
Posted by m3kw9
21st May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: What 'synthetic life' could mean for the energy industry
Ha, thanks m2kw9. It actually makes me a little uncomfortable, too,...and it's mine. I assure you that I am not watching you. Well...at least not constantly.

Melissa
Posted by Melissa Mahony
21st May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
I dont know whether to be outraged or not.
There was a time when, despite having a scientific outlook and a keen interest in developing technologies I would have balked at even the concept.
I used to think that tinkering with life in this way was a bad thing, cloning and genetic modification in particular and in fact I still do.

This however is a bit different. Having watched the video and heard the extensive list of protective devices they have included directly into the genome, and the fact that they have little interest in eukaryotic lifeforms and particularly multi-celled ones, I am somewhat placated. This isnt playing God, its trying to pull our collective *ss out of the fire...

It would appear that the focus is aimed towards creating an entirely new form of life, not for the ability to do so, but for the ability to generate cleanly a whole new niche for that organism to occupy. It actually makes more sense to create an entirely different organism to use as - or to make - fuel, that doesnt compete with existing ones for space or resources, even using our waste products for food to do so if necessary.

This is something that would not be possible to do by modifying existing organisms, which itself introduces all the extra risks of natural gene pool contamination - something else that wont happen with an artificial genome. Its closed, wont evolve and is highly unlikely to even be compatible with anything it could come in contact with.

Contact itself is more simple to control, with dependencies built right in, the created lifeform can be passively contained by its own growth medium.

I am impressed with the responsible attitude the researchers have taken, but I'm still not sure our Creator would be entirely happy... Its not that they've done it, or even why, its what others will do with the ability that worries me.
Posted by SiO2
21st May 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!