Follow this blog:
RSS

Utility-scale solar plant for Fukushima

By | June 26, 2012, 4:23 AM PDT

Solar looks set to become a bigger part of Japan's energy curve.

A  Japanese town recovering from the Fukushima disaster is teaming with Toshiba Corp. to build several solar electricity plants that combined could be Japan’s largest solar facility, according to several reports.

The northeast coastal town of Minami Soma plans to install 100 megawatts of solar at a cost of 30 billion yen ($378 million), Reuters reported recently.

The 100 megawatts would be about 2 percent of the 4.7 gigawatts of capacity at the now idle Fukushima Daiichi nuclear station 16 miles to the south, which suffered meltdowns when the devastating earthquake-triggered tsunami knocked out cooling systems last year. Parts of Minami Soma were in the no-go zone following the meltdowns.

After the Fukushima disaster, Japan shut down all of its 54 nuclear power stations.

The nuclear closure has deprived the country of about 30 percent of its normal electricity capacity. To compensate, Japan has embarked on energy efficiency and conservation programs. It has also turned to other power sources like liquefied natural gas, a fossil fuel that it imports. According to The Information Daily, Japan currently generates about 90 percent of its electricity from CO2-emitting fossil fuels.

To help curb fossil fuels and encourage renewables, the Japanese government has just approved measures requiring utilities to purchase renewable electricity at pre-set prices for up to two decades. The so-called feed-in tariffs are particularly generous for solar.

Japan is also expected to start turning on some of its nuclear reactors again, such as the two that Prime Minister Yoshihiko Nado approved some 10 days ago.

The 100 megawatts of solar at Minami Soma might signal a move toward more localized energy production. Minami Soma has a population of about 68,000 according to Wikipedia. My back-of-the-envelope scratching tells me that 100 megawatts would be plenty for the town, and then some.

According to a Publics.bg report citing Kyodo News, the municipal government and Toshiba “are also considering establishing a next-generation ’smart community’ featuring efficient energy use” and “will call for Japanese and foreign investors to help them set up a special purpose company to build and operate their solar stations.”

While several reports said the 100 megawatt facility would be the country’s largest, the Japan Daily Press had a different take, noting,

“Their claim of building the largest solar plant in Japan does easily trump Kyocera’s previous announcement of a 70 megawatt solar facility in the southern prefecture of Kagoshima, but both companies have seem to forgotten that Softbank already has plans to build a 200 megawatt plant in Hokkaido.”

The story also delivered an upbeat opinion on the new feed-in tariffs, noting,

“The push by many companies, large and small, to enter the solar power market in Japan comes with the government’s approval of profitable pricing incentives. Utility companies will be required to purchase electricity from providers of renewable energies. This is expected to lead to billions of dollars in investments for clean energy, and will hopefully lead to less of a reliance on nuclear power for Japan.”

The pricing incentives should indeed help encourage renewables investment. It’s the sort of thing that helped establish Germany as the world’s leading producer of solar electricity over the last decade. But Japanese consumers can also expect to pay more  -  utilities have typically raised the money for funding feed-in tariffs in part by hiking the rates they charge customers who do not generate renewable electricity.

And don’t count out nuclear, especially alternative and safer forms like the thorium reactor that utility Chubu Electric Power Co. is investigating.

Toshiba plans to start building the Minami Soma solar facilities this year and to start operating them in 2014, Reuters said.

Photo: Lance Cheung via Flickr.

More Japanese power on SmartPlanet:

More big solar:
Some solar innovations:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
the math doesn't add up
100 MW might be 2% of 4.7 GW, but the 100MW power level is only available for 8 hours a day, so we're really talking a bit less than 1%.

So to get back the capacity, in GW-hours, of this one plant, we newed to build 100 of these $378 million installations... wow, 37 billion dollars to replace one of 54 plants.

(and I haven't taken into days when the sun doesn't shine)

doesn't sound very economical to me.
Posted by dilkie
26th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Math doesn't add up
Actually the PV system would produce less than 5.5 hours a day and with panel performance and inverter losses it would probably produce less than .5% of the power from Fukushima.
Posted by gogarya
26th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Yeah, you have to compare apples to apples
Nuke plants don't put out full power 100% of the time. Let's say they have 20% downtime (for maintenance, inspections, etc.). So the Fukushima plant was averaging 0.8*4.7GW=3.8GW.

I am assuming that a "100 MW solar power plant" puts out 100MW at MAXIMUM. If that is the expected power averaged over a year, then somebody please make that clear. Otherwise, the average power is much less. Factor in roughly 0.50 to account for darkness, and factor in roughly 0.75 to account for clouds. And let's say they have a 95% uptime. So the average pwer is 0.50*0.75*0.95*100MW=36MW.

That is 36MW/3.8GW which is about 1%. So Japan will need 100 of these solar plants for every 1 Fukushima. (And that's ignoring inverter losses and performance deterioration over time, and also ignoring that the solar plant lifetime is (normally) much less than that of a nuclear plant.)

Solar proponents might argue that the Fukushima plant is currently putting out ZERO power, making solar infinitely better. But that's not a real argument, because by that argument hamster-wheel power is infinitely superior to nuclear (and infinitely better than solar too, at night).
Posted by dmm99
Updated - 26th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Above
Idiots,forget what their breathing in right now,figure that out first?
Posted by saynotoatom
26th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
Solar power/Nuclear power
would be unnecessary if all their lighting devices were replaced with LEDs.
It can be argued that this would be a very costly exercise and probably will be.
However if the time and cost factor of construction, decommissioning and health consequences (and its long-term costs/consequences) are incorporated
it does not seem all that expensive.
Apart from that it is likely that the current price of LEDs will drop substantially due to
economies of scale.
Also a lighting devices replacement programme can be implemented and completed in a substantially shorter time scale than any of the other proposals.
The question which does arise is:
Why is the proverbial elephant in the room always being ignored?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elephant_in_the_room
Posted by kwickset@...
Updated - 26th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!