Follow this blog:
RSS

US, UK join forces on ‘floating’ offshore wind turbines

By | April 22, 2012, 4:01 PM PDT

Siemens wind turbines in the North Sea off Denmark, fixed to the seabed. Siemens is among the companies developing ‘floating’ turbines.

US Energy Secretary Steven Chu and his UK counterpart Edward Davey are set to announce that the two countries will jointly develop offshore wind turbines that don’t require anchoring to the seabed. “Floating” turbines potentially cut maintenance and installation costs and allow operations further out at sea.

The agreement is the “initial focus” of a broader memorandum of understanding that the U.S. and UK will sign this week to collaborate in energy development, according to a press release from the UK’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).

“The UK and US will agree to collaborate in the development of floating wind technology designed to generate power in deep waters currently off limits to conventional turbines but where the wind is much stronger,”  DECC said.

The UK has more offshore wind capacity than any other country. Davey, who heads DECC, said that he expects floating turbines to play a big role in Britain’s carbon-reduced future.

British Energy Secretary Ed Davey (l) with Anders Eldrup, CEO of Danish wind and power provider Dong Energy, in February. Dong is a partner in the 367-megawatt Walney Wind Farm off northwest England - the world's largest operating offshore wind farm.

“Floating wind turbines will allow us to exploit more of our wind resource, potentially more cheaply,” Davey said in the press release. ”Turbines will be able to locate in ever deeper waters where the wind is stronger but without the expense of foundation down to the seabed or having to undertake major repairs out at sea.”

Floating turbine proponents say that maintenance crews will be able to tow turbines to dockside for repairs, rather than carrying out more expensive work at sea.

The technology could play a vital role in Britain after 2020, following development of shallower water sites, Davey said.

A UK government-industry partnership called Energy Technologies Institute is currently selecting companies to participate in a £25 million ($40 million) small demonstrator floating field that by 2016 would have a capacity of 5-to-7 megawatts (A fraction of a typical coal-fired utility and of some existing British offshore wind plants such as the 367-megawatt Walney Wind Farm 9 miles off the coast of northwest England, believed to be the world’s largest operating offshore installation).

ETI’s members include DECC and other government agencies as well as oil companies BP and Shell, Germany utility E.On, French utility EDF, Caterpillar and Rolls-Royce (the aerospace and engine company, not the car company). ETI expects to chose contractors by early next year.

In the U.S., the DOE’s recently announced $180 million program to fund offshore wind could including floating technology, the DECC release noted.

The broader US/UK pact, including floating wind, is  called “Collaboration on Energy Related Fields.” It calls for joint efforts in power generation and in energy transmission, distribution and efficiency.

The US/UK announcement precedes Wednesday’s start in London of a 2-day gathering of energy ministers from 23 countries to discuss renewables, energy efficiency, electric vehciles, carbon capture, buildings, industry, smart grids and other themes. Chu and Davey are co-chairing the  gathering, called the Clean Energy Ministerial.

“Ed Davey will sing a number of bilateral agreements with conterparts form other governemnt to work in collaboration over the coming years,” DECC states.

Other countries or regions attending the conference are: Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Denmark, European Commission, Finland, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Norway, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Arab Emirates.

Photos:  Wind turbines from Siemens. Ed Davey, Anders Eldrup from DECC via Flickr.

More wind at sea on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Question on costs verses options.
Offshore wind farms, like their oil platform cousins, have a major logistics problem. Building and maintaining underwater cables from each tower to a grid that then has to get the power back to shore is costly to maintain. While technically possible from deep water, there is substantial power loss while accomplishing that feat.

Would it be more efficient and cost effective in deep water situations to have each wind turbine platform a free standing unit that converts water to hydrogen? The units could be modular, wind turbine, converter, barge terminal, storage unit, etc which would simplify maintenance.

To minimize down time a modular section could be replaced with a spare while undergoing repairs. Better yet, modules could be rotated in and out for routine maintenance rather than taking an entire unit off line.

Modular barges could dock with the platform to haul the hydrogen to a terminal closer to shore. Designed properly the barges would be an integral part of the platform. The combined storage of the platform and the barge could be in excess of 1 months production to allow the unit to operate through storms. They could then move the cargo to an offshore terminal when water conditions were safer.

The central terminal could pump the hydrogen to shore and/or use it to run generators and the power could be sent to shore on a shorter set of cables. A key benefit that this layout would offer would be a more reliable power source. The hydrogen could be stockpiled for periods of low wind or peak power usage.

It also sets up nicely to support hydrogen powered vehicles as an alternative to gasoline. Even the barges could be hydrogen powered.
Posted by Hates Idiots
23rd Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Long electric feeds lossy, not necesarily
We have an AC feed from the mainland of British Columbia to Vancouver Island. Before leaving the mainland it is converted to high voltage DC and then reconverted back to AC on arrival on Vancouver Island. The losses associated with capacitance and inductance coupling into the sea water is averted and the use of high voltage to transport the power means less losses due to resistance. I'm sure that similar methodologies could be incorporated into offshore wind power installations. Where there is a will and a need there is a way.
Posted by radiodog4@...
19th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Great comment on the article
Hates Idiots nailed it on the head with his comment on this article. It sure would seem cheaper and more efficient than underwater cables running to the grid. Hopefully the water to hydrogen idea and transporting it closer to shore for distribution will be looked at.

http://solarpowerenergy1.com/blog/
Posted by wildtky44
25th Apr 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Lotus Notes 8.5.1: Greater Google inteGration
avril, soit entre les deux tours du scrutin. louis vuitton"qui d'ordinaire ne peuvent pas faire entendre leur voix ?? la?Fran? louis vuitton homme(FN), d??nonce le bilan"mauvais"? sac louis vuitton"? louis vuitton femmeret?? de 22 ans qui accompagnait sa condamnation ?? perp??tuit??, pour un quadruple meurtre familial qu'il a toujours ni??. louis vuitton sac speedyLe coureur n'en ??tait pas ?? ses premiers faits d'armes en la mati??re. Louis Vuitton Sac ArtsyEn cas de faillite de cette derni??re, celui qui a vendu le CDS doit verser une certaine somme ?? l'acheteur, comme dans le cas d'une assurance. sacs louis vuitton Les Fran? louis vuitton pas cherois Hollande, critique lui l'"exercice? louis vuitton site officiel
Posted by michael kors handbags
14th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Wind still gaining traction...
Just look at what's happening with India and South Africa at the moment:
http://www.renewable-energy-technology.net/wind/south-africa-selects-indian-turbine-firm-develop-138-mw-wind-project
Posted by KeithBRIC
25th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
floating wind turbines
whether floating wind turbines are possible in the sea having more waves like Arabian sea
Posted by joicehitler
29th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!