Follow this blog:
RSS

The Great Lakes: contender for first U.S. offshore wind farm?

By | June 23, 2011, 4:00 AM PDT

The nation’s first offshore wind farm will likely rise from the salty surface of the Atlantic Ocean. But a project in the Midwest is hoping to beat the East Coast to it.

For all parties, the race to be first is more like a marathon. Its hurdles include years of public dissent, technological challenges, and deep funding. Still Freshwater Wind tells NPR they are in it to win it. Their finish line is Lake Erie, about 7 miles northwest of the Cleveland Browns Stadium.

The plan is to start slow, with five 4-megawatt turbines from General Electric. The farm will be small but not the turbines, and not the price. At $20 million each, they will stand more than 200 feet tall, with blades stretching 150 feet. Lake Erie Energy Development Corp (LEEDCo), an Ohio non-profit promoting offshore wind, wants to see 1,000 megawatts of capacity in Lake Erie by 2020. This could potentially produce enough power for 200,000 homes.

Over on the north side of the lakes, the Ontario government benched its immediate plans for turbines on Lake Ontario in February. So far, Sweden leads the world in freshwater wind farms, but only by one. Dynawind’s 10 turbines whir over 330-foot waters in Lake Vänern. This 30-megawatt wind farm just went commercial last May, and how it performs (economically and environmentally) could guide the others trailing behind them.

Freshwater Wind, for instance, is looking into how a wind farm and a Lake Erie winter mix. How the turbines’ bases handle the lake’s ice floes are the concern—something the Atlantic’s seafaring turbines wouldn’t encounter. Disrupted scenic views and water depths are also challenges that Great Lake projects face, and again, funding.

Lorry Wagner, head of LEEDCo, tells NPR:

We know we have to get [the cost] down to approximately half of what it is today and that’s an immense challenge; we don’t have any illusions about how difficult this is going to be.

And they better hurry up. Despite Cape Wind’s recent setback of the DOE tabling its application for loan guarantees, the controversial Nantucket wind farm remains in the running. Siemens told Bloomberg on Tuesday that the company is willing to finance the whole project. Game on?

Related on SmartPlanet:

Image: Vindpark Vänern

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-3 Votes
+ -
wind power
Everyone is talking about it....windgenerated electricity. many designs and prototypes came into being. the end result ? still the same as before...not much progress. why ? little or no support from the Government. why ? oil diggers lobbying behindd. but think about it...wars fought to secure oil supply..your kids died for no cause of yours.. oil is depleting. why don't we start changing our paradigm ? and set a new course toward a free energy world free of polution....don,t you see?we have changed the world's climate...flooding YOUR homes now...blowing off YOUR roofs !!!!! still dreaming ? come ! 'lets put our heads together to create the more efficient windgenerated elecricity.
Posted by bigbobmaowong
23rd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Poor development is a major factor.
Please do not make anecdodal statements about climate change leading to more flood and storm damage. We are seeing far more damage because of flooding and tornados than in past decades because of where we are building.

Urban sprawl in the Midwest has put millions of people in harms way from tornados as fields are paved over for housing. Where 50 years ago a tornado would rip up a few farms and miles of fields we have thousands of homes and businesses. More tornados are reported because there are more people where the tornados happen. It has nothing top do with global warming.

The governments well-intentioned, but poorly designed flood insurance program founded in 1968 has promoted trillions of dollars worth of development in flood prone areas since it was started. One classic example is St. Louis. The 1993 flood hit largely residential areas around the city causing over $1.3 billion in damage.

Since 1994 over $3 billion worth of new housing and businesses have been built in those flooded areas with no changes made to the flood control systems. Those areas will flood again and it has nothing to do with global warming.
Posted by Hates Idiots
23rd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
wind power cost...free?
Even when 85% of the cost of wind power is subsidized by tax incentives, and other government handouts, wind power is still significantly higher in cost. The reason wind power is not taking off is cost. Still, I have a wind generator and solar for my off-grid living. I personally spent the significantly higher price to be independent, not to save money. Over the life of the equipment considering very generous estimates, my power will cost up to 10 times what current line power costs.

When you say little to no support from the government I am curious. Wind projects here in Washington State are almost completely funded by the government.

Based on your comments I would assume that you have not reduced your personal carbon footprint. Rather than demand others do the deed start with your own home. Once you are off-grid and actually doing something about the energy crunch then I won't mind listening to your mindless rant about the "causes".
Posted by Original-gray2hairs
23rd Jun 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Cleveland wind power
Interesting.... I live in Cleveburg, near the lake. There's almost always a good wind coming off the lake, so a wind-farm makes sense if it can be brought off at reasonable cost. I note that Lincoln Electric, the big arc-welder manufacturer, has just erected a big wind turbine at its main plant in Euclid, about a mile inland. There are several others now operating in the area, and they are not just for demonstration or show - these are hard-eyed industrial. Somebody knows something, and I wish I knew what.
Posted by father.nature@...
23rd Jun 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Cleveland wind power
I'm not positive about the Cleveland, but here in Washington the government incentives to go with renewable energy are sufficient to offset the incredibly high costs involved. Businesses here receive both federal and state money plus tax credits. Even though the incentives do not pay completely for the renovations, many businesses receive significant public good-will for converting. Basically, I am glad to hear about Lincoln Electric and because they are going green I would consider them over their competition.

Make no mistake though about going green saving money because it does not. Only when 85% or more of the green cost is subsidized does it become "cost-effective". What they know that you don't is that you are paying for their project with your tax dollars.
Posted by Original-gray2hairs
23rd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
ICE!
I lived on the shore of Lake Erie for years and have seen the damage the ice does to structures in the water. I really wonder how these wind turbines are going to deal with that for long.
Posted by RoyLoo
23rd Jun 2011
0 Votes
+ -
It probably makes more sense in the Great Lakes...
...than it does in the ocean, where the losing battle against corrosion will at least take a bit longer...
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
I grew up in Lorain, Ohio on the shores of Lake Erie
When I went back to visit in 2010 I noticed a couple wind turbines already built in Sheffield Lake, Ohio. But they were not out in the water, they were on the lake shore. So why does this article discuss putting turbines out in the water? Why ask for trouble with the water, waves and winter ice? Just line the shoreline with them as others have already done. One thing to remember, in the deepest darkest part of winter the Lake Erie water sprays and freezes on *everything* so the ice load must be kept in mind.

Also an alternate location would be to put the turbines out in the harbors on the breakwalls. The breakwalls have been in place for years, would supply a sturdy platform on which to erect the turbines, offer a steady place for the construction and maintenance workers, etc.

Finally, why put the turbines anywhere near the water at all? The on-shore and off-shore winds are not only present on or near the water but also are present miles inland. Once you get outside of Cleveland proper, there is pleanty of land available relatively close to the shoreline. For example, along the Ohio Turnpike. The right of way is already in place, it's clear of trees and (of course) offers easy access. So plant the turbines in the median.

Thank you.

Terry Thomas...
the photographer
Atlanta, Georgia USA
http://www.TerryThomasPhotos.com
resident of Lorain, Ohio from 1945 to 1963
Posted by AtlantaTerry
24th Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Can't do that Terry.
Taking advantage of the same volume of wind by putting the turbines on land would cost less to build and maintain. Good planning and trying to get an ROI without a subsidy is against everything the eco crowd stands for. They always have to have their hand out for a subsidy or they get run out of the club.
Posted by Hates Idiots
24th Jun 2011
0 Votes
+ -
I live In Buffalo, New York
There are wind turbines located basically on the water front in Lackawanna, NY. They are land based but close to the water at the old Bethleham Steel site. I would love to see hundreds more built on the land and in the water around western NY. We also have the Niagara river where they should install water energy systems. The river is the one that dumps to Niagara falls and moves at a steady rate of at least 10 miles an hour. I'm sure they could generate a good amount of electricity from that.
Posted by Johnskis
24th Jun 2011
0 Votes
+ -
thanks for sharing
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 26th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!