Follow this blog:
RSS

Solar price free fall, part deux

By | June 21, 2011, 4:50 AM PDT

To paraphrase the old song: Catch a falling star and put it on your rooftop.

In this case, the star is that old favorite, the sun. On the heels of our report last week that prices of solar panels will plunge to $1.00 per watt by early 2012, Ernst & Young has spotted a similar free fall.

According to the Guardian newspaper in the UK, the consulting giant predicts that the installed price of solar panels will plunge to $1.00 per watt by 2013.

Last week’s report by IHS iSuppli said that the panels themselves will plummet to $1.00 per watt by early 2012, but that installed prices would at that time hover around $2.00 per watt. IHS iSuppli looked at panels made from crystalline silicon photovoltaics, the most common form of solar cell.

We all know about lies, damn lies and statistics, so take note that the two research and consulting firms are a tad apart on their hard numbers.

E&Y says the current installed price is $1.50, while IHS iSuppli would put it at well over $2.00.

But there’s a common thread – both companies show the price dropping off a cliff.

As E&Y notes, $1.50 is down from more than $2.00 in 2009. E&Y produced the report for the UK’s Solar Trade Association.

The Guardian points out that one factor driving down the price is the rapid decline in the raw material of silicon. “The report coincides with new data from Bloomberg New Energy Finance that show a drastic 28% month-on-month drop in the spot price of high-grade silicon, the raw material used in most PV panels,” the Guardian says.

Surely aggressive pricing by Chinese manufacturers also plays a part.

With prices dropping almost as fast as baseball’s Florida Marlins, is the moment coming when solar will achieve “grid parity” and make it competitive with, say, a coal-fired power plant?

E&Y says stay tuned. As fossil fuel prices rise, the time will come when, yes, it will make economic sense to generate your own rooftop electricity rather than plug into the grid.

The Guardian notes, “The report predicts that, with continued support in the short term, the levellised cost of large-scale solar will be no higher than retail energy prices by 2016-19. This suggests that within 10 years companies with large electricity demands will find it cheaper to install unsubsidized solar than to buy energy via the grid in the traditional way.”

If only solar electricity storage technology would advance at the same pace. Then, as the song would say, you could even save it for a rainy day.

Photos: Cover, qualtrics.com.  Above: wildjunket.com

Related Posts:

Solar module prices in free fall.

Magnifying solar electricity’s future.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+5 Votes
+ -
The last sentence is the key
It doesn't matter how inexpensive renewable resources become if the energy isn't available when it's needed. Storage is the biggest issue we face.
Posted by Schleeve
21st Jun 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Electricity storage
Flywheel energy storage (FES)
http://www.beaconpower.com/products/about-flywheels.asp
Posted by singertalk
21st Jun 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Flywheel Energy Storage
sinegertalk: Your flywheel solution might, just might, work in theory. But in practice some questions:

1. Cost per kW?
2. Volume occupied per kW?
3. Not sure how the frequency is maintained at a fixed value as the wheel is charged/discharged. Are you?
4. Is it really scalable to, say for example, 30% of the UKs 60GW electric power demand - i.e. 18GW - a figure that would be required were the UK government ever to achieve its aim of 30% windpower (which like solar has a huge variablity problem)?

Until you can come back with answers to those questions, your solution, frankly, is just so much hot air.
Posted by cosserat@...
21st Jun 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
electricity storage
Electricity storage is not a problem. Solar electricity is used during the day, and grid electricity is used during the night. Simple
Posted by kitemanmusic
7th Oct 2011
0 Votes
+ -
you can't simply switch to grid power at nighttime
Coal_fired power plants can't be turned on and off at will. That's why we have peak and off-peak electricity.
Posted by tim@...
31st Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Just got a quote its still over 5 USD per watt installed.
No cheap solar on main street yet.
Posted by Reality Bites
22nd Feb
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!