Follow this blog:
RSS

Renewables overtake nuclear power generation in U.S.

By | July 7, 2011, 4:20 PM PDT

Renewable energy is no longer the underdog amid the national energy mix. Clean power production in the United States crossed a major milestone in January, exceeding the amount of electricity generated by nuclear facilities.

A monthly report published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), a statistical and analytical agency within the U.S. Department of Energy, shows how renewable energy sources narrowly out produced nuclear power during the first three months of the year (Table 1.2).

U.S. Energy Information Administration / Monthly Energy Review June 2011

U.S. Energy Information Administration / Monthly Energy Review June 2011

Biomass and hydroelectric power were the two largest sources of renewable power. Those were trailed by wind, geothermal, and solar power, respectively. Forbes credits heavy spring rains in California, Oregon, and Washington for a 52.2 percent surge in hydroelectric power generation.

The last time that renewable electricity surpassed nuclear power generation was at a brief point in the mid-nineties; otherwise, nuclear energy has led renewables for most of the past decade.

Venture capitalists have suggested that renewable energy technologies are reaching grid parity for the first time, and General Electric has predicted that solar power will soon become more affordable than fossil fuels and nuclear generated power.

Last month, Ernst & Young forecasted that prices of solar panels would plunge to $1.00 per watt. Research published by IHS iSuppli published a week earlier came to the same conclusion.

Global clean energy investment increased by 32 percent in 2010 to a total of US$211 billion, according to the United Nations. Most of that growth occurred in China and Europe to finance wind and solar projects.

U.S. Venture capital firms invested over $1 billion into renewables during the last quarter of 2010 alone, and there has been a growing financial commitment from stakeholders in the private sector such as Google.

Historically, renewables held a lengthy lead over nuclear power throughout the 70’s and into the 1980’s. Then the production of nuclear electric power rose dramatically from mid 70’s onward, but has since plateaued as renewables have been further developed.

It is likely that nuclear power’s percentage of the energy mix will creep upward as well. The federal government is spending billions in subsidies to construct next generation nuclear reactors.

The EIA report also reveals a slight uptick in natural gas-fired power generation and a potential trend away from coal. Northeastern states including Pennsylvania, which has vast reserves of natural gas, led gas-fired generation.

Those states sit atop expansive shale gas reserves, which are being tapped through a controversial mining practice called hydrofracking. The national energy mix is changing, but that change is occurring gradually - for the time being.

Photo: Esther Harlow/Flickr

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

David Worthington

About David Worthington

David Worthington is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

David Worthington

David Worthington

Contributing Editor, Energy

David Worthington has written for BetaNews, eWeek, PC World, Technologizer and ZDNet. Formerly, he was a senior editor at SD Times. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

David Worthington

David Worthington

David does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers. Occasionally he consults for other companies; should David cover a topic in which a client is involved, he will disclose this fact in his writing. His views do not represent those of ScaleOut Software.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Yay! I love renewable energies!
I am glad solar power is increasing and becoming more affordable. Then, people would be able to make power from their own homes. To add on, our devices and appliances will become more energy efficient, use less power, and become smart by turning themselves off when they are not being used. This might create a surplus and people will be able to share or sell energy.
Posted by IAW94
8th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
Solar is still not the answer
While the panels themselves are becoming cheaper, they still do not solve the problem of storing the energy for use at night or during cloudy days. Nobody has figured out how to do that economically. You can install solar at your home, but much of your power will still come from coal and natural gas.
Posted by zackers
9th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
So, if you remove hydroelectric from the "renewable" mix...
...just how low would "renewables" rank?

I'm all for "renewables", but I'm also not going to allow myself to be fooled in accepting that outside of building more dams (which is now politically taboo) that the category is going to grow significantly enough in the foreseeable future to put a dent in those other categories.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 8th Jul
-1 Votes
+ -
Everything starts from somewhere.
In 1800 coal was a miniscule amount of the energy picture and petroleum was non-existent. It takes time to build up the infrastructure. If Solar PV costs continue to fall like other electronics have they will soon be very competitive with other sources of electricity.
Posted by riverat1
8th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
That wasn't my point.
Of course everything starts from zero, and I do believe in renewables. I just think the framing of this story was silly; attempting to mix the well established centuries old technology of hydroelectric with the relatively new technology of "renewables", and then trying to build hype around it simply because the west was blessed with an abundance of snow this year.

It's kind of like building climate models on hypothetical data, and then excluding actual solar data.

So next time there is a drought, will we see an article on SmartPlanet with the data presented as it is above about the failure of "renewables" to keep up with other forms of energy?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 8th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
The DOE
lists hydroelectric as a renewable source of electric generation. It's all in the report.
Posted by David Worthington
8th Jul
+2 Votes
+ -
Again, that wasn't the point.
Next time there is a drought, will SmartPlanet run a story with the headline "Renewables again fall short of nuclear power generation in U.S."? I seriously doubt it.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
8th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
mixing renewables solves most if not all of your so-called "problems"
Hydro can indeed be a viable energy storage for cheap solar and wind by using these renewables to pump water into a reservoir, to be released during times when the wind is calm/cloudy days and night.

I'm not sure if you used the climate modeling merely as a heuristic device, but in case you actually thought they have those deficiencies, there are no climate models being used by climatologists who don't revise them to more closely simulate real data dynamics and all of them have solar components.
Posted by klassman6
9th Jul
-1 Votes
+ -
Where our energy comes from
You can find the sources of our electric power, reported monthly, at http://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/pdf/mer.pdf . Page 3 of the current June, 2011 breaks it down. It turns out that of the renewables, hydro is only the second most important source. The biggest source, at almost twice hydro, is biomass. Most biomass is ethanol produced from corn. This currently uses 40% of our corn crop, yet yields no more than 5.7% of our overall energy production (I'm not sure how much of biomass is ethanol and how much is things like wood and biomass waste burning).
Posted by zackers
Updated - 9th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
Quadrillion Btu
The units for the bar chart are Quadrillion Btu.
There are two points here:

1 The comparison between nuclear power and renewables is (almost certainly) valid because the bars, almost certainly, show the amounts of electricity generated each year. If the units had been, for example, peak capacities, then the comparisons would have been very misleading because of differences in capacity factors for different technologies.

2 The 3 bars for fossil fuels are, almost certainly, much too high. This is because, almost certainly, they show the gross energy content of the fossil fuels, not the useful energy that may be obtained from them. For example, in an internal combustion engine, about 80% of the energy that is put into the tank goes out of the tail pipe as heat. Electric vehicles are very much more efficient.
Posted by gerrywolff
10th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
solar power
The sun is always going to be there for us, why not use it to our benefit. Put solar panels on the moon, the side facing the sun, and the side facing earth we would transmit the energy by microwave or laser technology.
Posted by simplysimpee
10th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
Thank you very much
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 25th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!