Follow this blog:
RSS

Purple wind turbines to save bats?

By | October 19, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

Why might a bat care what color a wind turbine is? Because the insects it hunts by echolocation do, according to a new study.

The research, published in the European Journal of Wildlife Research, finds that the typical white and light grey colors of turbines are more attractive to insects than purple tones. And whatever we do, we shouldn’t paint turbines yellow, the insects’ fave. Paints with high ultra-violet and infrared properties? Also a no-no, according to the research.

Depending on their location, wind turbines kill many bats that are migrating through, looking to roost, or feasting within wind farms. (Eastern states tend to have higher bat fatalities, with the hoary bat, the eastern red bat, and the silver‐haired bat species being most vulnerable). Interestingly, previous research has found that bat deaths don’t typically result from striking blades but by the inability of the small mammals’ lungs to cope with sudden air pressure changes as the blades whirr past.

The deaths typically happen at night and during the summer when insects flit about turbines the most. But a three-year study conducted in the English countryside suggests that painting turbines certain colors, with purple being the least tempting to bugs, might help decrease bat mortality.

The researchers placed colorful placards—pure white, light grey, squirrel grey, sky blue, traffic red, traffic yellow, pale brown, opal green, red lilac (aka purple) and jet black—beneath a turbine and kept track of what bugs landed on what color and how often they did so, day and night.

BBC quotes study author Chloe Long:

If the solution were as simple as painting turbine structures in a different colour this could provide a cost-effective mitigation strategy.

So purple turbines it is! Purple’s my favorite! Though I suppose not everyone’s. At least it would blend with sunsets?

But wait, before we douse all our turbines in lavender, the researchers say color might not be the only factor at play. Heat might also bring the bugs to the structures. For instance, they suspect that the heat-absorbing black color in the study served as a “thermal lure” to many insects.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Images: Flickr_Peter M2009 and Chris Harshaw

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
Bat mortality is just one of the dirty little secrets about wind turbines. They kill migrating raptors, too, and they get located in less than optimum areas (with respect to both efficiency and environmental damage) because of politics and corporate greed. Big subsidies and tax incentives feather corporate nests at the expense of the taxpayer.

These industrial monstrosities can be a terrible nuisance to people living nearby and do nothing to benefit the environment on account of the so-called "green credits" that they generate, which allow other polluters to pollute more, simply by ponying up some cash.

Just another example of corporate America taking advantage of the well meaning but clueless environmentalists. A tree hugger is no match for a corporate suit when it comes to subterfuge.
Posted by omb00900@...
19th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
Have any studies been done to measure the capacity of animals to adapt to wind farms?

As much as I hate to think that our steps toward green, as small as some think they are, result in some animals dying, I have to assume that over time the smart ones avoid dangers and their offspring learn to adapt.

Unless the vast consensus of tree huggers is that we should revert back to pre-industrial days, paint the turbines purple and keep the studies coming.
Posted by psoucheray@...
19th Oct 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
I believe the blades are painted "avaiation white" to provide helicopter and small plane pilots with the FAA required visablity of aviation obstructions.

Save the bats if you must, but the first time a aircraft hits a purple turbine, well...
Posted by Bruce.Whiteside@...
19th Oct 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
No paint job on a forty story industrial wind turbine will reduce the
infra-sound health hazard to humans living nearby:
http://www.windturbinesyndrome.com/

And, no paint job will improve their inefficiency. Be advised that
to replace the summer output of the 10 largest conventional
plants now operating in Virginia with wind turbines will require
32,693 of them spread over 3,277 miles of ridge tops. (some
footprint.) Now I know why it has been said that the negative
impact to forest habitat per megawatt produced can be greater
with industrial wind turbines than conventional plants.
http://www.vawind.org/Assets/Docs/Very_Shaky_Environmental_
Claims.pdf

At http://www.aandc.org/research/wind_pec_present.html I
learned that although a single 500kW turbine replacing a coal or
oil fired plant could save 0.078 tons/hr of carbon emissions, a
single 18 wheel-truck doing 60mph down an interstate highway
produces 0.080 tons/hr of CO2 emissions.

At best wind energy is a barely relevant sideshow, at worst a
deception that something worthwhile is being done to combat
emissions.
Posted by davidbuhrman
19th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
Why not place lights, pheromones, etc., anything that would attract the insects below the blades, near the ground so the bats don't fly into the blades.
The bug attractors could be fashioned into little bistro tables, so the bats could have a latte along with their insect tartar.
Why not figure out what scares the heck out of bats (echo-location wise), and play that sound (it has to be in a range outside of human hearing) to keep the bats away from the windmills.
Raptors (eagle, etc.) eat bats. I don't know whether or not the bats fear eagles, since they approach the bats from behind, where their echo location clicks have a blind spot.
Maybe the answer is to torcher a bat (the good of the many is more important than the good of the one), record it's little bat screams and play them back (so only bats can hear), in order to frighten them away from the windmills.
The only down side to this is that they won't be around to chow down on the insects, which they keep in check by eating them.
Posted by PSFTGURU@...
19th Oct 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
I've heard that emitting sounds can also be used to deter bats from
flying into the turbines.
Posted by stonecoldfox
21st Oct 2010
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
Give me a break. Paint turbines, at what cost? labour, the paint, repainting, extra weight.
If you can create the next gen using a purple resin, fine but lets not waist money with this tree huggin non scence
Posted by CharlesG1970
5th Nov 2010
-2 Votes
+ -
RE: Purple wind turbines to save bats?
I think it's great that the authors found an interesting application for the study results, but regardless of their good intentions, in this case really put the cart before the horse.

They ARE white already for a reason: to protect small planes and helicopter pilots. If you don't believe that that's necessary, you've probably never piloted either.

History, particularly with regards to the environment, is full of unintended consequences. But that works both ways. Simply thinking about this for five minutes could have saved the author some embarrassment by not presenting these study results in a way that would directly endanger humans while protecting bats.
Posted by lazarusrook
5th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!