Follow this blog:
RSS

Philips developing rare earth substitute for LEDs, says CEO

By | April 23, 2012, 4:20 AM PDT

A bright idea from Philips: Innovate away from rare earths.

Philips CEO Frans van Houten revealed this morning that his company is developing technology that will reduce reliance on rare earth minerals vital to LED lighting products.

Rare earths are key in the industrial and consumer world, from everything to energy efficient light bulbs that cut carbon emissions, to iPhones to missiles. But China controls about 95 percent of the world’s supply, which has led to pricing and availability challenges for the West.

While that has prompted World Trade Organization complaints by the U.S., Europe and Japan, it has also triggered innovation among companies like Toyota to move away from rare earth reliance.

Count Philips now among the innovators.

“We have launched some innovation projects in order to become less dependent on rare earths,” CEO Frans van Houten said in conference call with analysts this morning to discuss first quarter financial results. ”You cannot eliminate it of course. But in our labs we have been able to find a way to significantyly reduce the amount of rare earths that we need in order to make our products.

“So that, in the mid-term is good news. It will still take us a couple of quarters before that comes to bear ..But it’s nice to see that when you put pressure on your organization they come up with creative ideas.”

More from me later on this. I have to leave my office for Parliament in a few minutes to discuss thorium — the alternative nuclear fuel that’s connected to rare earth minerals, so I’ll hold off for now on diving into the many insightful details that van Houten revealed about LED sales and profits during the call. Some of his discussion circled back to the news I broke last week that Philips will start selling an LED bulb in Europe for less than €10.

Watch for additional details about Philips’ LED business here tomorrow or later this week. I’ll tell you this much for now: the company’s LED financial situation is improving, but it still has a long way to go. News at 11, as they used to say.

More rarities and LEDs on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Once again...
...the "invisible hand" acts.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Apr 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
History Repeats
This similar to the Pre WWII Japanese taking over rubber production. When the war started for the US, we had shortages of rubber and we over came that by making a rubber substitute. What helped win the war against the Japanese was that the US could build efficient and effective ships and planes at a cost of replacement less than Japans'.
Posted by sboverie
23rd Apr 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Trade games
At the end of the day, these trade games have a way of backfiring.
I'll bet that there must be some items that would seriously affect the Chinese should some of their rare earth customers decide to play the same game.
Just saying ........
Posted by da philster
23rd Apr 2012
0 Votes
+ -
what goes around comes around
Just like Sony emerged contrastingly with quality products at a time when Japanese goods were quite cheaply made, who, if anyone, will be the "Sony" of China?

Or, is a super-quality consumer product from China impossible now because they have all stabbed each other in the back so many thousands of times and ground the workers into the dirt so hard that it will always be a source of commodities? Is the baton of quality is still lying in the road of time near the corpse of Sony? Will it be picked up by another?
Posted by opcom
29th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!