Follow this blog:
RSS

New Jersey nuclear fusion firm ratchets up Iranian collaboration

By | May 30, 2012, 1:54 AM PDT

Fusion peacenik Eric Lerner, president of Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, at work in his lab.

Lawrenceville Plasma Physics, the U.S. company that is campaigning for peaceful and limitless energy via cooperation with Iran in developing nuclear fusion, has taken a bold step forward in that pursuit.

The small Middlesex, N.J. firm entered an agreement with Tehran’s Islamic Azad University to jointly design a fusion machine that is “high current and high energy” and that “would be affordable to construct in industrializing nations,” according to a contract I saw late last week, when I broke the story in The Guardian.

Eric Lerner, LPP’s president, and Mahmood Ghorannevis, who is head of Azad’s Plasma Physics Research Center (PPRC), signed the papers over the weekend of May 19th.

Some experts have for decades regarded fusion as the Holy Grail of energy sources that does not produce the dangerous waste associated with today’s fission nuclear power, and that augers a limitless supply of energy. Fusion puts atoms together rather than splitting them apart.

The problem so far has been that the elusive fusion process requires more energy than it returns.

To get around that obstacle, LPP is working on a form of fusion that’s different from “standard” fusion. It’s called “aneutronic”, and it does not rely on hot neutrons that escape during fusion and provide heat that drives a turbine.

Instead, it generates electricity directly – cutting out the turbine – by creating charged ions. LPP says aneutronic costs much less than neutron-reliant fusion, in part because an aneutronic machine can be much smaller.

Aneutronic fusion relies on an area of physics known as “plasma physics.”

Fusing minds and atoms: The agreement between LPP and Islamic Azad University.

“Iran is the only country at present, other than the U.S., which has a substantial research program in aneutronic fusion,” the press release states.

“Iran’s controlled fusion program has focused on these economical aneutronic devices in an attempt to leapfrog over (conventional) fusion to get a cheap, clean and inexhaustible energy source.

“Already, Iran has set up more active DPF (dense plasma focus) research groups – six – than any other country in the word. The United States is the only other country with an active aneutronic fusion effort.”

Geopolitical critics say the collaboration will never pass muster with U.S. trade sanctions, in place amid allegations that Iran is enriching uranium - the fuel associated with conventional nuclear fission – to make nuclear weapons.

But Lerner claims the accord is exempt under a U.S. Department of Treasury stipulation that “authorizes collaborating with academics and research institutions on the…creation and enhancement of written publications.”

LPP notified President Obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology of the partnership last Friday.

The agreement with Azad follows an LPP breakthrough last March, in which the company confined a gas for nanoseconds at 1.8 billion degrees C, much hotter than an industry record of 1.1 billiion degrees C that had stood since 1978.

LPP said in its press release that Azad’s Ghorannevis proposed the collaboration after learning of LPP’s “Fusion for Peace” petition aimed at forging fusion research ties between the U.S. and Iran. The phrase draws on the old “Atoms for Peace” slogan.

U.S. startup Tri-Alpha Energy, Irvine, Calif., is also working on aneutronic fusion.

Other fusion startups include General Fusion, Burnaby, Canada, and Helion Energy, Redmond, Wash. Both are working on neutron-based fusion and say their approach is less expensive than the giant €13 billion ($16.2 billion) international, government funded ITER fusion project in Cadarache, France.

Photo from LPP.

More fusion and alternative nuclear on SmartPlanet

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Incredible that the Obama administration is letting this happen...
If this technology is real, then it should be controlled under ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) and we should NOT be giving it to the enemy! Yes, I know it is not 'weapon,' ITAR controls lots of advanced tech that is not 'weapons.'
Posted by friedsonjm@...
30th May
+1 Vote
+ -
Iranian collaboration
I concur. These Arab countries sucker people in the U.S. into believing them, then they kill Americans in the name of their religions. Never trust your enemy, and Iran is our ENEMY....period.
Posted by maizenbluedoc
30th May
0 Votes
+ -
Our enemy?
Iran was one of our close allies little more than 30 years ago, remember? Why don't you research into what changed? Here is a hint: It was our fault. I recommend you watch this video: http://blog.ted.com/2011/04/18/a-radical-experiment-in-empathy-sam-richards-at-ted-com/
Posted by NoorEmmanuel
30th May
+1 Vote
+ -
Sanctions Without Teeth
Perhaps another small, innovative company can develop a plan/device for Iran to divert jet aircraft navigational systems directly into buildings tall or short without the need for knives, violence or upsetting passengers. Just enter the destination: White House, Empire State Building, or even, "nearest public school" and the plane would divert itself. It might be called "the Holy Grail" of an Iranian "travel for jihadist peace" program.
Posted by hd451
30th May
+2 Votes
+ -
Great News !
Collaboration between Iran and Us is the way to progress...if indeed progress is desired by the US. Many folks think regression is the way to go for the future, so the progress/regress thing will need to be worked out by the American population and government first.

The questions are, "Do you really want cheap energy?" and " Do you really want to pay pennies a month for energy costs, instead of hundreds, or thousands, of dollars you currently pay ?" and " Are you completely happy as an energy slave, by putting all your hard-earned cash into paying for expensive gas and oil products? And finally, "If you are currently happy, then why change anything??"

I'll bet most people will rather hang on to their polluted and expensive lives, just because it's easier. However, there is a glimmer of hope that the fusion thing can be pulled off, and as a species we can enter a much better parallel world. We merely have to demand it.
Posted by mrfixitrick
30th May
+2 Votes
+ -
"Oil Products"
"Oil Products"??? Do you mean Iran's #1 export. You're being naive, when you should be suspicious.
Posted by omb00900@...
30th May
0 Votes
+ -
Clarifying "Oil Products"
For me, it's not about being suspicious or not. It's simply time for mankind to end the burning of oil products. There are new technologies that produce about a thousand-fold increase in energy efficiency over oil products, with no pollution. We are entering an age of energy abundance. Even Iran realizes that oil products are obsolete within a couple of years, and is taking positive steps towards better technology for all.
Posted by mrfixitrick
30th May
0 Votes
+ -
huh?
What??? I think the question is "What are you selling?" This thing talks about a 'holy grale' and doing 'research'. It doesn't say anything about a working model that is being used ANYWHERE..? What do we need to collaborate w/ Iran for that we can't just send 'em an e-mail about? And who's gonna pay for all this?
Posted by albudseed
2nd Jun
+2 Votes
+ -
Dubious
I'm dubious of Iran's motives, and who wouldn't be? An oil rich country seeking a way to free us from our dependence on fossil fuel? It doesn't make economical sense. What does make sense is that there are supposed "scientists" in Iran that would look for a way to weaponize any advances (isn't that the way that it always goes anyway, e.g. nuclear fission), and in this case they are motivated by the likes of 72 hapless virgins. When it comes to technology and Iran, I wouldn't help them with their sundials!
Posted by omb00900@...
30th May
0 Votes
+ -
The long research story
Today every country seeks to have access to scientific knowlegde and technology. It is evident that mutual collaboration is more profitable. Some years ago where have been two major enemies (USSR and USA) but IBM shared the experience and products to USSR.

So why not? Today we have experience of the weapon fusion already. But we should learn how to do it in controllable (I mean technical control) manner. This is one of the actual research areas now.
Posted by Daniel Isakevich
30th May
0 Votes
+ -
idiots
Really? How damn dumb are you people? I noticed this writer mentions The Guardian in this article... another paper that is HIGHLY suspect because of its strange spin on strange news. Just like the "Guardian" this article tries to get us to believe that sending our resources to other countries (this is IRAN we're talking about, you schlubs) is a great idea! This is a giant load of crap... probably mob-backed agenda to keep big business and the big politics moving forward (backward for people). There are a bajillion kajillion better ideas than this left-fielder. I am reading these papers just to see what BS they're selling. Wonder how long till I'm banned..?
Posted by albudseed
2nd Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!