Follow this blog:
RSS

Japan: Nuclear no, renewables yes. China?

By | August 19, 2011, 5:38 AM PDT

Japan took another big step away from a nuclear power future, as its Cabinet approved a five-year science and technology plan that de-emphasizes next generation nuclear technologies – meant to be safe – in favor of renewables.

As the Mainichi Daily News notes, the Cabinet measure supports the position of Prime Minister Naoto Kan, who has advocated against nuclear following the March earthquake and tsunami that led to a meltdown at the Fukushima nuclear plant.

The five-year plan runs through March, 2016. The Cabinet was to have originally approved it last March, but postponed action until the Council for Science and Technology Policy could revise their draft recommendations following the disaster.

As a result, references to promoting research and development on fast-breeder reactor fuel cycle, including the Monju prototype, and the next-generation light-water nuclear reactor for practical use, were omitted,” the paper reports.

Fast breeders and next-generation light-water reactors are two technologies that the nuclear industry say can improve safety and effectiveness. Monju is a troubled fast breeder test reactor in Japan.

While the Cabinet was in action, other wheels of Japanese government were also spinning. Bloomberg reports that, “Japan’s lower house of parliament is set to pass legislation to subsidize renewable energy amid a push to reduce dependence on nuclear power.” The subsidies include feed-in tariffs requiring utilities to buy electricity generated from solar, wind and geothermal sources.

Kan is expected to resign after the bill passes, as it would complete legislative goals he set before fulfilling a pledge to step down, Bloomberg notes.

Even though Japan and other countries like Germany and Italy are walking away from nuclear, many people believe the technology has a bright future.

In contrast to the sentiment in Japan, China last month connected a small test fast neutron reactor – similar to a fast breeder – to the grid.

Although China temporarily suspended approval for new nuclear plants following Fukushima, some industry observers believe it will construct as many as 100 nuclear reactors over the next 20 years. Given that the world has about 440 reactors today, that would spell decent growth for the nuclear industry.

Photo: Chinaenergysector.com

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Fast-neutron reactors
For those who would like further information, the August 2011 issue of POWER magazine has an excellent article by James M. Hylko about small modular fast-neutron reactors. Here is a link: http://www.powermag.com/issues/features/PRISM-A-Promising-Near-Term-Reactor-Option_3887.html

Instead of allowing emotional, political, technically ignorant opinions to steer policy, as in Japan and the United States, the engineers who run China (the Politburo is all engineers) are taking a prudent course in satisfying power demand. They know better than to buy into the delusion of renewable baseload generation, which will wreck the grid by forcing coal plants to go into cycling mode to accommodate intermittent wind and solar. The inescapable fact is that wind is available mostly at night, when demand is low and lots is available from the spinning reserve and hydro, so it can't be sold except through compulsion (renewable energy standards) and subsidies (feed in tariffs)..
Posted by Wilmot McCutchen
19th Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Very interesting article
Thanks for the link. Any idea how it compares price-wise to current nukes that are in various points of construction? The article also gave no info on potential cost/kwh produced, which is difficult to calculate before one is built, but critical to whether it is worth building. And how does AREVA and others committed to conventional nuclear viewing this design? I'll bet they're doing everything they can do to stop it....
Posted by klassman6
19th Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Really?
Adding 100 reactors in 20 years would be "decent growth" considering the number scheduled to be shut down in that time period?

Wind wind continuing to fall in price, solar rushing toward cheap, tidal proving out and geothermal expanding, all producing electricity cheaper than new nuclear can, the future of nuclear is growing dim.

The big remaining question is whether pump-up hydro, utility scale batteries or CAES dominate the storage market. A mix of renewables and pump-up are already cheaper 24/365 providers of power than yet-to-be-built nuclear. Batteries are looking like they might be even cheaper than pump-up.

China is run by engineers who, so far, have been shown to be pretty pragmatic. I think watching the way they've slowed their nuclear program while accelerating their wind and solar programs might give us a good clue about the future.
Posted by Wallace Bob
19th Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Still the problem remains
WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO WITH THE HIGHLY RADIO ACTIVE WASTE ?
Posted by TonyTrenton
19th Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
WHAT ARE THEY GOING TO DO WITH THE HIGHLY RADIO ACTIVE WASTE ?
Bind it in molten glass and drop it down old uranium mines.

Next question.

-dlj.
Posted by david.lloydjones@...
28th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!