Follow this blog:
RSS

It’s a seagull! It’s a sail! It’s a pylon!

By | September 16, 2011, 3:40 AM PDT

Plexus, by AL-A and Arup

Plexus, by AL-A and Arup

The Royal Institute of British Architects has unveiled the final designs in its creative pylon competition. Feast your eyes upon Plexus, Flower Tower and their inspired rivals, all pictured here.

Flower Tower, by Gustafson Porter

Flower Tower, led by Gustafson Porter

The idea is to overcome opposition to transmission towers by turning them into works of art that do not blight the countryside.

Like many countries, as the UK brings on power plants and starts connecting more renewables to the grid, it’s going to need an effective and acceptable form of power distribution, which could include more pylons.

RIBA is sponsoring the competition along with the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC, Britain’s energy department) and National Grid, the publicly traded company that runs the country’s electricity and gas networks.

“Britain will see the equivalent of 20 new power stations constructed by 2020, and we need to use electricity pylons to get this new, low-carbon energy to your televisions and toasters, dishwashers and DVD players,” said DECC Secretary Chris Huhne. “We must make sure that we take into account the visual impact on the landscape and also the view of the public, and this is what the Pylon Design Competition is all about.”

Silhouette, by Ian Ritchie Architects

Not everyone sees the beauty. A vociferous anti-pylon movement wants to bury power cables underground and undersea, led by Defence Secretary Liam Fox, pitting him against fellow cabinet secretary Huhne. Some pylon opponents argue that underground transmission is actually less expensive than above ground, not the other way around as commonly believed.

Y-Pylon, led by Knight Architects

Y-Pylon, led by Knight Architects

Politics and economics aside, there’s no denying the inspiration behind some of the designs. In a BBC video, Mary Bowman of architectural firm Gustafson Porter refers to her company’s Flower Tower as evoking “the wing of a gull or the bloom of a flower or the branch of a tree.” Christopher Snow of New Town Studio notes that his Totem “says look through me, not at me.”

Totem model (and Christopher Snow), New Town Studio with Structure Workshop

Totem model (and Christopher Snow) by New Town Studio with Structure Workshop

T-Pylon, by Bystrup Architecture

Ian Ritchie of Ian Ritchie Architects says that his Silhouette design enables the structure “in a sense to dance through the landscape.” And Amanda Levete of AL-A note that her curved Plexus (I think it evokes a sail) “expands and contracts as it marches across the terrain and deals with different wind forces.” She adds, “the pylons don’t just impact our countryside, they actually alter our collective perception of it,” which could summarize the point of the competition.

The finalists and Huhne spoke at London’s Victoria and Albert Museum, which will display models of the designs until Oct. 5 as part of the London Design Festival. Judges are accepting public comments through the RIBA website. They’ll chose winners by the end of the month and dole out £10,000 ($16,000) in prize money.

The judges are not, however, in a position to award contracts for building the pylons. That would be up to National Grid, which has not committed to deploying any of the designs. They’ve said only that they’ll consider it.

The designs and their architects are: Silhouette by Ian Ritchie Architects and Jane Wernick Associates; T-Pylon by Bystrup Architecture, Design and Engineering; Y-Pylon by Knight Architects with Roughan & O’Donavon and ESB International in association with MEGA; Flower Tower by Gustafson Porter with Atelier One, and Pfisterer; Plexus by AL-A with Arup; and Totem by New Town Studio, with Structure Workshop.

Energy Secretary Chris Huhne with some of the final models.

Images, CGI: Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), Flickr

Related Posts:

When loss is more

Pretty in pylon

My beautiful transmission tower

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor, Energy

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Royalties
So I'll bet that if you want to use one of these pylons, that you not only have to pay a premium for the non-standard parts used to make the pylons, but there are most likely royalties will need to be paid to license the design....
Posted by tech_ed@...
16th Sep
+1 Vote
+ -
They're nice looking, but...
I must say that those pylons are attractive, much more so than our standard utility poles here in the U.S. However, I'm with the opposition group on this one. It would be a much, much better thing to bury all of these cables. Even if the upfront costs of doing so are greater than traditional poles, the amount saved on maintenance and replacement of parts that failed or were damaged due to exposure would easily make up for it.
Posted by 6Wolves1Spirit
17th Sep
+1 Vote
+ -
This is so cool!
I've always looked at the American pylons and thought they could look even better and sleek. Making them look more futuristic and technical, guarding America's vast electrical infrastructure. I, on the other hand, think it would add a modern touch to America's beautiful landscape. Some American landscapes are boring and could use some of these cool designs.
Posted by IAW94
17th Sep
+1 Vote
+ -
A Flawed Concept
Yes, it is true that on one likes to see the power lines. But the sad truth is that it costs almost 10 times more to build an underground power line than it costs to erect towers or other pylons. Then, the losses from underground AC power lines are again more than double the losses from above ground power lines.

the combination of those two often measured facts are why electric utilities continue to build long power lines or very high capacity power lines above ground. This will continue to be true, until very low impedance conductors (Superconductors) are developed. There are a few of those around right now, but they are very difficult to manufacture and use. They also require that they be immersed in Liquid Nitrogen to work.

Those are DC alternatives. AC power induces currents in the surrounding soil. The same is true for overhead power lines, but the overhead power lines are much farther from the dirt and water that are the actual power drains on the transmission lines. Think about it. power losses due to magnetic effects are based on an inverse square law. Is it better to be 25 meters away, or 25 millimeters?

Sorry, but the politician pushing this whole bury it AND save money is seriously science challenged. We had that in the US a century ago when the State of Tennessee passed a law making Pi equal to 3.0, based on some minister's interpretation of an obscure reference in the Bible. But, in spite of all the legal talent the state could muster, it proved impossible to enforce. Circles still kept needing that extra .14159... to close.

Still, we shouldn't be too smug, Over here in the US, we still have senators and a president who seriously believe that the way to get out of debt is to spend more.

Why is it that Politicians can't seem to grasp the concept of a negative number?
Posted by YetAnotherBob
Updated - 19th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!