Follow this blog:
RSS

Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama’s mind on offshore drilling?

By | April 30, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

The Obama Administration has increased the federal government’s involvement in helping BP try to contain, clean, and stop the oil spewing from the undersea well involved in the recent Deepwater Horizon accident.

Burning, booming, doming, dispersing, skimming, drilling—you name it—is being executed by the response effort, which now includes BP, Transocean, the Coast Guard, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Departments of Defense, Interior, and Homeland Security.

But will the leak influence Obama’s recent decision to nix the ban on offshore drilling for much of the East Coast and Alaska?

Reuters quotes White House spokesperson Robert Gibbs:

Could that [the determined cause of the accident] possibly change his viewpoint? Well, of course.

I think our focus right now is: one, the area, the spill; and two, also to ultimately determine the cause of it and see the impact that that ultimately may or may not have.

In numerous news reports, Governor of Florida Charlie Crist has stated his change of heart on the oil extraction practice:

It’s clearly not clean enough after we saw what we saw today—that’s horrific—and it certainly isn’t safe enough. It’s the opposite of safe.

Meanwhile, longtime offshore drilling opponent Florida’s Senator Bill Nelson has introduced legislation that would temporarily bar the Obama Administration from expanding offshore drilling, including seismic testing and exploratory operations, into new areas. There is also a Congressional investigation into the incident.

According to NOAA, the well is leaking 5 times more oil than previously thought. This amounts to 5,000 barrels each day.

As brown ribbons of crude spread more than 150 x 30 miles across the Gulf, drifting closer to shore and nearing the Mississippi Delta, they bring ecological and economic disaster to fishing, tourism, and wildlife communities.

As of last night, the oil had reached within three miles from land, with reports of clumps of oil already washing ashore.

Top Image: Flickr/DigitalGlobe-imagery
Bottom Image: NOAA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
The problem
Do we not get upset with the potential prospective of 11 bodies washing ashore?

We need energy, but we need it extracted safely. Safety cuts into profits, so it doesn't get the investment we deserve. Until they can figure out a way to make sure companies toe the line (look at the oil spills, coal mine collapses, Marcellus Shale misteps (see "Cabot in Dimock, PA)), then we shouldn't be encouraging these ventures. The environmental damage is a true tragedy, but the victims of these incidents are simply victims of criminal negligence and worse.

"Drill, baby, drill" gets followed shortly by "Spill, baby, spill". If you're lucky, it's only oil or coal sludge. In too many cases, its blood that's getting spilled.
Posted by ejhonda
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
ejhonda, you can rest assured that, as long as Obama and the democrats
are in control in Washington, there will be no "drill, baby, drill", or "spill, baby, spill".

Obama's announcement to allow, even if limited, offshore drilling for oil, is nothing but a sham.

I don't think anybody in the oil industry takes him seriously, especially when, whatever the exploration or drilling, would've been destined to occur way after Obama was out of office. Things change on a daily/weekly/monthly/yearly basis as far as economic policies are concerned, and whatever Obama declares as a policy today, is liable to be changed the next day or the next month or the next year, especially when somebody else might be in charge.

It's also very curious that the "accident" in the gulf happened barely a month after Obama declared his change of heart about drilling for oil? Very suspicious, don'tcha think?
Posted by adornoe
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
Some sort of recording process (audio, video, decision log) that is continuously uploaded to an off site location would be be very helpful in determining what happened. I wonder if this information exists and if so, will it be disclosed by legal action.
Posted by jpclemons3@...
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
jpclemons3@.: it depends on who's doing the investigation.
Even if the information exists, there might be people who would not allow it to be disclosed. The legal system is sometimes powerless against the political system or big government.
Posted by adornoe
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
For months now, the oil company propaganda on TV has been about how safe the new offshore technology has become. The technology may have improved, but BP was not using one critical piece of it - an automatic shutoff. Why? These things are mandatory in Norway and other places, but voluntary in the USA. The cost is high ($.5B) so BP didn't volunteer part of their profit. The cost of this disaster will far exceed half a billion dollars. What Obama should change his mind about is regulation if the offshore operations are to proceed. The automatic shutoff should not be optional.
Posted by josmyth
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
oil = oil spills
Anytime oil is drilled, there will be oil spills. There's no "if" about it. Consider that any oil rig has a certain allow amount of leakage down on the sea bed and through the pipes leading up to the water surface. Overland pipelines are allowed a certain % of leakage. Run millions or billions of gallons of oil through them and the leakage is large.

As with our food system, people are too far removed from the dirty business of oil extraction, refinery and production. People forget how nasty a substance petroleum is. This is a tragic reminder of why we need to move away from oil as fast as possible.
Posted by chefp
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Go vertical biofuel farming
If more resources are used towards developing closed-loop,
vertical cultivation of algal biofuel, then there is no need to drill
for oil. Why drill for something easily available on land that also
has superfood-quality protein byproducts? Vertical, closed-loop
farming of algal biofuel is already a viable, small-footprint
alternative, thanks to the Canadian company Valcent. Virgin
Atlantic is aggressively pursuing a goal of becoming
independent of fossil fuel with its own algal biofuel farms, and
Continental Airlines is also heading that direction.

It's time to "keep the oil in the soil." "No drilling, no spilling."

? Shyam Tony Reyes
Posted by shyamreyes
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Pretty cool it is happening to BP of all corp.
They spent an enourmous amount of capital trying to make us think they were environmentally friendly... Sad!
We need to be able to think beyond bodies...It is sad for the families, but the impact of burning fossil fuels and making plastics and chemicals is many more than 11 every single hour. probably in the range of 10 every single minute. Politicians and corporations have set us up to become dependant on chemicals and fuel to feed ourselves. The truth is that is a sham. Fuel is required to make insane profit from the production of food (no the farmers don't make insane profits, but the corp who buy their food below cost do). You actually need no fuel to make a garden!
Posted by provincialplace@...
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
I fully understand why it might be wise for our society to declare a moratorium on oil drilling, much like one might understand the reasoning behind a moratorium on building nuclear power plants in the wake of Three Mile Island in 1979.

A moratorium for a few months, or a few years, is one thing. Permanently giving up, for all time, offshore oil drilling or nuclear power is another. What I would like to see is for the loss of valuable oil to be stopped as soon as possible, using the total resources of the world's offshore oil industry. Then, we should have a conference involving all the world's oil companies which have an interest or investment in offshore oil.

What we need, are technologies to assure not only so much that offshore oil rig disasters will never happen, but means to shut off the discharge of valuable oil if an accident (or, a particularly destructive hurricane) does happen.

As the holder of an M.S. degree in nuclear engineering (Purdue University, 1973) one might expect me to have enough of an emotional vested interest in nuclear power to say, "ha ha I told you so" when a disaster involving another technology - offshore oil - causes far more environmental damage than Three Mile Island ever could have caused.

But I'm not gloating. In fact, I'm worried. Worried not only about loss of irreplacable oil and environmental destruction, but worried too that people who hate our western way of life will use this unfortunate disaster as a raison d'etre to demand ever more draconian fuel economy requirements for cars, 50 mile per hour speed limits, and other constraints on our way of life.

So its important that as we desire assurance that even the worse nuclear reactor meltdown will not result in release of tons of radioactive materials, we should also develop the technology to assure that when and if offshore oil disasters occur, discharge of oil into the environment can be shut off.
Posted by AlexKovnat
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
I don't think it should change Obama's mind. If we don't try to get the oil, China and others will be building oil rigs 10 to 20 miles off our shore with ships and planes to protect them. And those guys are not known to give a hoot about their own people let alone anyone else.

What caused this spill? Who would gain the most by this tragedy? The answer to the 2nd question is the Mid-east. The answer to the first question is... Hummm...
Posted by Me_too
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
Me_too & adornoe@ - you both make a reference to somebody's mind being "changed". I submit that one need to have a mind to be changed first! grin
adornoe@ - you stated:
"It's also very curious that the "accident" in the gulf happened barely a month after Obama declared his change of heart about drilling for oil? Very suspicious, don'tcha think?"
I find equally "interesting" that the initial explosion on the drilling platform occurred the night before "Earth Day". Strange coincidence?
Posted by JTF243@...
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
JTF243:Yeah, those are interesting questions... do you have any answers and
not just further questions?

The "earth day" radicals and whoever might've caused the "accident" might be related in their methods and environmentalism and their ideology. That is, if it really wasn't an accident.

So, where are your answers?
Posted by adornoe
30th Apr 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
Wow, if you are an environmentalist and you actually cause an oil
spill the day before earth day to prove your point, there's got to be
something wrong with you!*

*"you"- referring to a hypothetical being, not anyone in particular
Posted by stonecoldfox
1st May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
stonecoldfox: Where have you been the past 40 years or so?
The environmental wackos have been known to stop at nothing to get their message across. They destroyed property and killed people as a result of the actions.

And, what the heck is that "hypothetical being" stuff? Why not come straight out and speak your mind?
Posted by adornoe
1st May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Compromise, Conflict, & Corruption Obfuscates Risk Management Practice
I think those are more of a concern for any effort that has environment and public safety risks but they are occurring and contributing to disasters. Why shouldn't an endeavour that has potential long term effects both positive and negative be given the most regard for risk management and control?
Obviously, it is because of the desire for short term profit and affiliation or direct inolvement with industry insiders enables the compromise. To me, it deserves criminal investigation. I suppose it's a matter of the path chosen, either by personal choice, political influence, private or public organization. Whatever it may be, don't hide it and allow those that may suffer the consequences an opportunity for involvement or to protect themselves. That's good for people but we still have to represent the wilderness and understand our connection as well as reliance on envirosystems.
Whether Pres Obama understands that is questionable but he should clean house of any undue influence that has caused or leads to compromise, conflict, and corruption.
Posted by donnydo77@...
21st May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Is the Gulf oil tragedy changing Obama's mind on offshore drilling?
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
Posted by birumut
9th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!