Follow this blog:
RSS

Hydro-frackers to EPA: We used diesel. Tough.

By | January 31, 2011, 5:35 PM PST

journeyoftheforsaken.com)

“We then asked the oil and gas companies that operate the wells the same question. Several of these companies responded that they operated wells only in formations where natural gas deposits lie deep below the water table,” the report states. (image: journeyoftheforsaken.com)

A Congressional probe sponsored by House Democrats has found that some of the largest hydraulic fracturing firms in the United States routinely pumped millions of gallons of fluids containing diesel fuel into underground wells throughout the past decade.

Twelve firms cited in the report, released today, took advantage of a period of regulatory lapse between 2005 and 2009 when no new federal rules were issued to outlaw the practice. It also appears that the government willfully abdicated its oversight role.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 carved out an exemption for hydro-fracking from the Clean Drinking Water Act - unless diesel fuel was used. However, the probe found that not a single permit was granted to use diesel fuel during those years.

“This appears to be an area of significant noncompliance with the requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act,” House democrats said in the report. The representatives urged the Environmental Protection Agency to act on the information.

The EPA released a statement saying, ‘”EPA has embarked on an expeditious effort to clarify the permitting process as it relates to diesel use in hydraulic fracturing operations.”

Industry spokesperson told Reuters that oil service companies were in the clear, because no federal rules governed the use of diesel in hydro-fracking at the time.

“Retroactively imposing a permit requirement is clearly improper,” said Gary Flaharty, a Baker Hughes spokesman. The company has discontinued its use of diesel fuel in its mining operations, it says.

Hydro-fracking is a controversial mining technique that is employed to extract natural gas from shale. A borehole is dug deep into the ground to inject a proprietary chemical mix that breaks up and opens channels in rock formations. Gas is then expelled from the rock and collected.

Fracking firms are not required to disclose what chemicals are used in the process, and critics warn that acute environmental contamination is possible.

A 2010 documentary called “Gasland” uncovered widespread groundwater contamination in regions where fracking occurred, while the oil and gas industry maintains the documentary is grossly inaccurate.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

David Worthington

About David Worthington

David Worthington is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

David Worthington

David Worthington

Contributing Editor

David Worthington has written for BetaNews, eWeek, PC World, Technologizer and ZDNet. Formerly, he was a senior editor at SD Times. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

David Worthington

David Worthington

David does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers. Occasionally he consults for other companies; should David cover a topic in which a client is involved, he will disclose this fact in his writing. His views do not represent those of ScaleOut Software.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Fracking Lies
The hydrofracking industry is signing up pseudo-scientists to help them push this devastating process in NY. Here in the Hudson Valley, the pseudo-scientists like George Baum, chair of the Kent NY Conservation Advisory Committee (yes, the town actually appointed a pro-polluter to their conservation commission!) stands to personally profit from this disgraceful, polluting practice. As we've come to learn, you just need to "follow the money" to see why they support fracking. Shame on the "wolves in sheep's clothing" who have sold out for the almighty dollar!
Posted by The_Truth2
24th Jul 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Let me think, is any petroleum product and drinking water compatible?
Its not brain surgery to answer that simple question, and just because a government didn't tell them not to do it, doesn't justify doing it. These are supposed to be grownups and professionals. They probably justify this action by saying, "we only satisfy a need...." but that's the same line, drug dealers use.
Maybe we should put them in charge of our drinking water?
Posted by A World Maker
2nd Feb 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!