Follow this blog:
RSS

How to eliminate Japan’s nuclear reactors: LED light bulbs

By | June 29, 2011, 3:45 AM PDT

If Japan replaced all of its 1.6 billion light bulbs with LED varieties, the country would save the annual electricity output of 13 nuclear reactors.

So says the Institute of Energy Economics, a research group overseen by the country’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.

IEE analyzed the benefits of switching to LEDs following the March nuclear disaster in Fukushima. Meltdowns prompted the country to abandon expansion of a nuclear industry that has provided 30% of Japan’s electricity with 54 reactors - 35 of which remain shut for safety.

IEE’s findings surfaced this week in the Mainichi Daily News.

“Promoting the introduction of LED lights will serve as energy-saving measures that have immediate effects and sustainability,” the Tokyo-based online paper quotes an IEE representative as saying.

LED light bulbs use only about 10%-to-20% of the power consumed by incandescent light bulbs, and about 60% of fluorescents, including common energy-saving compact fluorescent bulbs. IEE figured that Japanese homes, offices and manufacturing sites use some 1.6 billion bulbs, annually eating up 150.6 billion kWh of electricity.

If people replace those with LED bulbs, the country would cut annual consumption by 92.2 billion kWh, to 58.4 billion kWh, according to IEE. It says that’s the equivalent of 13 nuclear reactors, a quarter of the country’s total.

Cost is a challenge. As we’ve noted before, LED bulbs in the U.S. can have retail prices of $40. If you have, say, 40 bulbs in your house, you’d pay $1600 to replace them all at once.

IEE tallied the bill for 1.6 billion bulbs in Japan at ¥15.7 trillion ($194 billion). However, the upfront cost provides long-term savings not only in electricity bills, but also in longevity. Manufacturers say LED bulbs can last for 25 years, although it will take a quarter of a century to find out if that’s true.

Another knock on LEDs, especially for home users, is that lighting designers and architects note that they lack the warmth of incandescent bulbs. But the good news from Japan - 70% of the 1.6 billion bulbs in Japan are fluorescent, to which many people would prefer LEDs for glow.

Related Posts:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor, Energy

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
$ Estimates
Before reading the article the proposition intrigued me financially. I used $2.5B for reactor development cost (a 2008 number I found somewhere). I also used $25 per bulb (there should be some economy of scale associated with 1.6B bulbs.

Bulb costs would come out to $40B, vs $32.5B to build reactors.

$7.5B seems like a pretty reasonable investment as opposed to the $10Bs to $100Bs impact the recent disasters are going to have.
Posted by mnavar13
29th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
I doubt the math
Does it take into account the energy cost of manufacturing LED bulbs? How about the cost of manufacturing fixtures and installing them?

If I look up right now I see fluorescent lights in long tubes. What is the equivalent LED solution?
Posted by jtdavies
Updated - 29th Jun
+2 Votes
+ -
Um...
(Don't be dense) ...long rows of LED's
Posted by Lightning Joe
29th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
OK
Care to provide a link to where I can buy them on Amazon? Do they use existing ballasts in fluorescent lights or do these have to be pulled out and replaced?
Posted by jtdavies
30th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
about ballasts
you have to change the ballasts because the LEDs use different kind of power source ,.
Posted by yifengchaoran
17th Oct
+2 Votes
+ -
This will likely work for the Japanese.
They have a certain social ethic that lets them consider the advantages of accepting individual controls on behalf of the common good.

...while Americans are so fixed on their fantasy of "freedom" that they will stick with the old ways JUST BECAUSE to give them up would "limit" their "freedom" to stick with them. Try making sense of that, and you'll understand why some states are passing laws to counteract the Federal government's mandate on old-tech incandescent bulbs. Seems that some old-tech manufacturers would be "forced" to update their processes (or even (gasp!) LIQUIDATE), and those businesses don't like it.

The next round, replacing fluorescents with LED tech, will likely bring out the same dinosaurs yet again. Welcome to the soon-to-be richest third-world nation in the world, thanks to our prehistoric ideas of what "freedom" means.

BTW, due to the savings of bulk manufacture, and the competition of bulk needs, the costs will go down precipitately as soon as we focus on making them in bulk. There are no rare materials in them, and they are now basically made piecemeal and soldered together in gangs, is why they cost so much. Get the tech going, and we'll soon be printing them.
Posted by Lightning Joe
Updated - 29th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
LED
We are starting to see flashlights here in the Philippines with LED's...but the prices are still too high for routine use.
I am very worried about the mercury from the newfangled lightbulbs, which will probably not be correctly recycled here...Makati (suburb of Manila) just collected a ton of discarded lightbulbs and batteries to safely recycle, to give you an idea of what the future holds...
Posted by tioedong@...
29th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
What a BIAS!
The Institute of Energy and Economics believes that the world's nuclear industry has to be closed down? What's with the assault on the only CO2 free baseload power source - nuclear energy? This Institute, whoever they are, are zealots as can be seen by their picking out nuclear and not coal. In this case, what is really reliable about the information from such a source? It's like using Greenpeace so far as I am concerned. How come Smart Planet does not have more critique of such work? Are you even competent to judge if this IEE work is competent?! I don't believe what they are saying these IEE people purely because of their stupid, stupid bias.
Posted by Caroline Webb
30th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
thanks for sharing
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 25th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!