Posting in Energy
Republicans angry with President Obama's denial of a permit for the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline intend to resurrect the project - by any legislative means available.
Republicans angry with President Obama's denial of a permit for the Canada-to-Texas Keystone XL oil pipeline intend to resurrect the project -- by any legislative means available.
A handful of efforts are underway at the moment. Whether these various attempts actually led to an approval for the pipeline is unknown. Congressional Democrats won't make it easy and it's unlikely Obama would ever sign off on a bill that reversed his decision. Still, Obama technically didn't reject the project altogether. At the time, he said the decision was based on the State Department's inability to meet the deadline. TransCanada plans to reapply for a permit, which means the pipeline proposal will come up again -- just not until after the 2012 presidential election.
Here are four tactics the GOP is pushing at the moment:
Last week Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, introduced the Keystone for a Secure Tomorrow Act of 2012 to immediately approve the pipeline. Republican Rep. Lee Terry of Nebraska also has introduced legislation to transfer the State Department's authority on the border-crossing pipeline to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. The bill also mandates the agency to approve it within 30 days. If FERC takes no action within 30 days, the permit is considered to have been issued.
Over the weekend, House Speaker John Boehner committed to getting the Keystone XL pipeline approved. He told ABC's "This Week" that Republicans will include a provision to approve the pipeline in a bill to extend funding for highway and mass-transit programs, if necessary. Republicans are expected to introduce this week the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act to extend transportation programs another five years beyond its March 31 expiration date. Several oil-related provisions, which includes opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling, have already been added to the bill. The intent is to have revenue generated from expanded oil-and-gas drilling to pay for the infrastructure reforms, the Hill reported.
Separately, Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., introduced a bill today that would let Congress approve the pipeline under the U.S. Constitution's commerce clause. Forty-four senators signed onto the bill, including Democrat Joe Manchin of West Virginia, which would authorize TransCanada to build and operate the Keystone XL pipeline from Alberta, Canada to the refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast. The bill would allow the company to move forward with construction while Nebraska -- where there's been significant concern over the pipeline's route through the Ogallala aquifer -- works to find an alternative route.
- Obama expected to highlight oil, gas production
- Obama blocks Keystone XL project
- Congress may bypass Obama on Keystone XL pipeline
- As BP exits solar business, TransCanada jumps in
Jan 30, 2012
Both sides are posturing on this one. By originally delaying his decision until just after the election, it's widely believed Obama was going to bow to the unions and approve the pipeline anyway when it wouldn't affect his support by the greens. This is just another pipeline. It's not the end of the world. Nebraska is criss-crossed by thousands of miles of pipelines already, and the aquifer is still intact. And if we don't take the oil, China will. Canada's production of it is totally outside of our control, and the world is not going to use less oil if we don't build the pipeline.
They don't care 'bout no stinkin' EIR. To them, rules are for Congress to break to their porky whims.
There is a new clean energy technology that is one tenth the cost of coal. LENR using nickel. Incredibly: Ni+H(heated under pressure)=Cu+lots of heat. This phenomenon (LENR) has been confirmed in hundreds of published scientific papers: http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJtallyofcol.pdf "Over 2 decades with over 100 experiments worldwide indicate LENR is real, much greater than chemical..." --Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist, NASA Langley Research Center "Energy density many orders of magnitude over chemical." Michael A. Nelson, NASA "Total replacement of fossil fuels for everything but synthetic organic chemistry." --Dr. Joseph M. Zawodny, NASA