Follow this blog:
RSS

How China is taking over Italy

By | November 14, 2011, 5:31 AM PST

Super Mario: Mario Monti

China’s rampant rise into a global economic powerhouse has over the last couple of decades increasingly challenged the ability of the free world to compete while still adhering to democratic principles.

After all, China gets things done autocratically. It can level a village and build an electricity station if its technocratic leaders deem it good for the economic plan, for instance. Such unequivocal development challenges the economy of a democracy that spends more time and money debating its decisions.

So when Italy began installing an unelected technocratic government to replace its ridiculed - but elected - prime minister Silvio Berlusconi over the weekend, one had to wonder: Is this the start of the slippery slope away from the West’s democratic ideals?

As has been widely reported, Italy’s ceremonial head of state, president Giorgio Napolitano on Sunday appointed an economist, Mario Monti, as the new prime minister to lead a technocratic government that will help pull Italy back from financial ruin.

Monti is now selecting a cabinet of fellow technocrats. A technocracy, as defined by the Oxford American dictionary, is a “government by technical experts, as scientists, engineers, etc.”

Sounds like China. Europe has so far failed to convince China to contribute to a bailout fund for financially troubled European nations. In the absence of those funds, one might say that countries like Italy and Greece are veering towards a more Chinese style of government - like Italy, Greece has also dumped its prime minister in favor of technocratic leaders.

Italy and Greece and thus the West are starting to validate the Chinese system. Chalk that up as a victory for China. Who knows, China might even decide to contribute to what Europe hopes becomes a €1 trillion ($1.4 trillion) bailout fund if Beijing sees governing styles that it recognizes as potentially more decisive than wishy-washy democracy.

Of course, Italy is not exactly China. Relatively speaking, Italy has a democratic tradition. And it is not a one-party state as is the giant from the East. In fact, Berlusconi’s own party agreed to support the technocracy under the condition that Italy holds elections again once the new government passes economic measures. Another party, the conservative Northern League, has so far withheld its support – not that it’s mattered.

And Mario Monti himself has “people” cred from his days as EU commissioner for competition from 1999-2004. He earned the nickname Super Mario for helping to axe a merger between General Electric and Honeywell, and for defeating Microsoft on anti-competition allegations.

A technocracy should help Italy recover at the moment, just as it should help Greece.

But anyone who favors a world run by freely elected leaders should watch with trepidation to see how long Italy’s interim technocracy lasts.

Photo: European School of Management and Technology via Wikimedia

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Here's the problem.
The technocrat's judgment is easily clouded over by political bias and bullying. And no one really cares about who's in charge of Italy and Greece anyway, because both are headed for failure with or without technocrats.

The ECB refuses to act as the lender of last resort, and there is no flexibility in EU's partners to shoulder costs of a bailout of a sovereign entity, not to mention the domino effect on banks. The Euro will be dead shortly.
Posted by gork platter
14th Nov 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
none of it matters.
The west has become a lazy place full of lazy people. 35 hour weeks.. etc the only way Europe and Britain can get out of this mess is by working again.. .. and getting rid of all the illegal scroungers they let in.
Posted by jameswrightone@...
14th Nov 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
Awkward situation
The unelected technocrats are put in charge to clean up the mess that the elected officials made. The unelected technocrats have a freedom from having to campaign for the position, they can push through changes that might help while they are under the pressure to do something and dealing with opposing factions.

The problem with too many elected officials is their ambition is not matched by their abilities to solve problems important to the majority. It also points out a flaw in the constituents who vote on a gut level and not intelligently. I prefer democracy over technocracy but I would like to see technically proficient types be seen as leaders. I prefer intelligent statesmen over the partisan ones.
Posted by sboverie
14th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
In a perfect world...
the public servants should be the most efficient people in their community.I guess that in such kind of society, there would be necessary a law to 'obligate' those efficient people to work for the community for a giving period of time before being replaced, meaning, people really efficient would be more interested in other things than running public services, or in other words, we keep elected politicians for lack of good alternatives and therefore, we base our leaders selection on promises and agendas of groups of interests.
Posted by FuzzyIce
14th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Pet peeve alert.
I hate people who complain about the evils of long term elected officials, yet keep reelecting the same people over and over.

Monitored elected officials are far better than unelected bureaucrats appointed by a usually faceless group of ruling elite.
Posted by Hates Idiots
14th Nov 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
Long term vs term limits
The advantage to long term elected officials is that it takes time to learn the ins and outs of congress, it takes time to build a reputation that puts a congress critter on a committee and eventually become the chair for the committee. The disadvantage of a long term official is that they get too ingrained into the political machine and forget who their constituents are. Term limits would only work if everyone elected had those limits.
Posted by sboverie
14th Nov 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Just an example of the consequences.
Ultimately, the borrower becomes slave to the lender.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
17th Nov 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!