Follow this blog:
RSS

Helium: The next hot commodity

By | December 21, 2011, 7:45 AM PST

Like this balloon, the price of helium is now rising. Photo: Cameron Balloons.

The next hot commodity could be hot air.

Helium, used in everything from blimps and hot air balloons to MRI scanners, particle colliders, scuba gear, semiconductor manufacturing and rockets, is in short supply. Bad news, considering another potential for the inert gas: it could serve as a safer and more effective coolant for nuclear reactors, replacing water used in conventional reactors such as those that melted down at Fukushima.

The helium shortage made news about a year-and-a-half-ago. Now, Canadian stock market advisor Stockhouse suggests it could become “the next hot commodity.” Writing on its website, the company notes,  ”Helium prices have already doubled over the last five years. And as U.S. reserves are depleted and supply dwindles, helium prices will continue to rise.”

That’s an understatement compared to observations by Cornell University physics professor Robert Richardson, who said in 2010 that the price of helium should rise by between 20-and 50-fold.

“Professor Richardson also believes that party balloons filled with helium are too cheap, and they should really cost about $100,” the UK’s Independent wrote at the time.

A big reason why we’re running out of helium is that for historic U.S. policy reasons (click the links above for the amazing details), it has been cheap. So cheap, in fact, that we’ve had no incentive to recycle it. As the Independent pointed out, “NASA makes no attempt to recycle the helium used to clean its rocket fuel tanks.”

That’s a no-no because, “Once helium is released into the atmosphere in the form of party balloons or boiling helium, it is lost the Earth forever,” Richardson noted.

U.S. policy has changed recently, and market forces now drive the price, which should keep rising like a, er, balloon. Among the reasons: supply and demand. Not only are we not recycling helium, we haven’t been producing it. Helium has been stockpiled as a byproduct of natural gas production. The largest store of it has been in a disused gas field in Amarillo, Texas, a place known as the “helium capital of the world” (now you know where to go if you want to raise your voice to Mickey Mouse pitch).

“The fact remains that helium suppliers are experiencing a reduction in production and only one new plant is on pace to come online in the United States over the next three years,” says Stockhouse. The story also points out that the U.S. represents 39 percent of  all helium consumption and is the world’s largest supplier, but it could lose its supply lead as Russia, Algeria and Qatar ramp up production to serve China and other countries.

I’ll suggest another future source of helium: Nuclear fusion. Helium is a byproduct of the fusion process. Like in the sun - helium is named for Helios, the Greek god of the sun - helium emerges when hydrogen isotopes bond. That should provide an extra incentive for the scientists and venture capitalists that are developing fusion reactors. As I’ve noted on SmartPlanet and in my new report Emerging Nuclear Innovations: Picking winners in the race to reinvent nuclear energy, a number of fusion start-ups including General Fusion, Helion Energy and Tri-Alpha could commercialize a fusion reactor much sooner than the proverbial “30 years from now” time frame.

Here’s another nuclear incentive: Helium is a more effective coolant than water, so it can allow nuclear reactors to operate at higher and more efficient temperatures. It is also a safer coolant than water because it is inert, unlike water’s hydrogen, which is explosive. Several companies are developing helium-cooled nuclear reactors, including General Atomics’ fast neutron reactor, and Q-Power’s pebble bed reactor, all part of a movement away from conventional nuclear.  The U.S. Department of Energy gives priority to gas-cooled reactors within its Generation IV Nuclear Systems Initiative.

One way or another, it’s time to produce some more helium, and to recycle it. Meanwhile, stock up on your party balloons. No telling what they might cost next year.

Helium atom image: pss.scdsb.on.ca

More helium lift:

Alternative  nuclear on SmartPlanet:

And elsewhere:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor, Energy

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Wow...
...people are just realizing this now?
Posted by wcecsharp@...
21st Dec
+3 Votes
+ -
Why?
Why do you begin this article with the statement "The next hot commodity could be hot air." and then show a hot air balloon, neither of which have anything whatsoever to do with the subject of the article???
Posted by omb00900@...
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
baloney
While it is actually true that current (cheap) supplies of Helium are running out, it is far from the whole story. Neon is produced by liquifying air and separating out the Neon. Once you do that, you basically have a gas that would be 75-80% Neon with the remainder Helium. (Helium is ~5.5 ppm, Neon 18.2 ppm)

Thus Helium produced that way should cost on the order of 4x the cost of Neon today, instead of the current value that's about ?1/3? as far as I can tell. Make balloons really expensive, but that's about it.
Posted by davidvhouston@...
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
There is a lot of contradiction here.
On one hand, our supply of He is being largely wasted. (Undoubtedly true) And our stockpile is diminishing. But at the same time we're in peril of losing our lead by new suppliers entering the market?

Also, I'm hardly impressed by what any "stock market advisor" has to say publicly to anyone who's not paying him. If he really believes his hype, he'd shut up and would be working on ways to corner the market.

On the other hand, I do believe that fusion is the real future, which will render the He issue, along with most of our current "green" silliness moot, at least until the Progressives find a new crisis to replace carbon.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
21st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Fusion will not be a big source of helium
While fusion will produce helium, it won't produce nearly enough to ease the shortage. The reason for this is Einstein's equation E=mc^2. The energy released by producing enough helium to meet our needs would far exceed what we can currently use.
Posted by zackers
22nd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Fusion will not be a big source of helium
While fusion will produce helium, it won't produce nearly enough to ease the shortage. The reason for this is Einstein's equation E=mc^2. The energy released by producing enough helium to meet our needs would far exceed what we can currently use.
Posted by zackers
22nd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
The US has been dumping helium ffrom the strategic stocks...
...for several years, artificially lowering the price even as we recognized that supplies are running low.

Your government in action, transforming public resources into private profits.
Posted by wizoddg
22nd Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Shoddy science reporting
Your grasp of science appears to be really weak, which makes the reporting seem shoddy. As other posters have mentioned, hot air balloons have nothing to do with helium, your opening sentence makes no sense, the accompanying photo is inappropriate, and fusion will produce no significant amount of helium in the foreseeable future. Helium depletion is a big issue, however, so thanks in principle, at least.
Posted by LedLincoln
27th Dec
-1 Votes
+ -
Good News
its good news for helium.....
Posted by pawancarrot
Updated - 3rd Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!