Follow this blog:
RSS

Graphic of the day: solar’s dramatic rise

By | July 9, 2012, 10:53 AM PDT

The increase in solar photovoltaic capacity has been well documented in reports here and elsewhere over the years. But nothing quite captures solar PV’s dramatic rise in capacity like a good graphic. Or three graphics, for that matter.

Solar power generating capacity grew by 73.3 percent in 2011, according to the 2012 BP Statistical Review of World Energy. That’s the fastest growth since BP started tracking that data in 1996. Total capacity grew by 29.3 gigawatts to reach 63.4 GW. Capacity has grown almost ten-fold over the past five years, according to BP’s annual report.

BP released its annual statistical review last month and at the time, the graphic, which is pictured below, stood out to me.  I proceeded to promptly forget the visually striking data until today, when I spotted a series of renewable energy graphics based on BP’s stats created by Robert Rapier of R-Squared blog at ConsumerEnergyReport.com. Rapier’s renewable energy graphics are part of a larger graphical series on energy.

Here’s BP’s graphic, which accompanied the report.

Here is Rapier’s global solar PV graphic.

Both graphics illustrate Europe’s primary role in driving solar PV capacity, thanks largely to incentives. In 2011, solar capacity growth was dominated by two countries, Italy, which added 9.3 GW, and Germany, which added 7.5 GW. Together, they accounted for 57.1 percent of global capacity growth in 2011, according to BP’s report.

The U.S. and China clearly trail Europe in terms of solar power generation. Rapier broke out the solar PV numbers for the U.S., China and Japan to illustrate the dramatic growth in those countries as well.

Photo: SunEdison; Graphics from BP and Robert Rapier

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Kirsten Korosec

About Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Contributing Editor

Kirsten Korosec has written for Technology Review, Marketing News, The Hill, BNET and Bloomberg News. She holds a degree from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. She is based in Tucson, Arizona.

Follow her on Twitter.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
PV Is Useless in Northern Latitudes without subsidy...
Of course PV is on the increase - due entirely to the vanity of idiot politicians, aided and abetted by rent-seeking fellow travelers, who are robbing the electricity consumer and/or the taxpayer in their naive enthusiasm to save the planet from wicked CO2 (actually in itself a non-existent problem, but even if it were a problem, PV in northern latitudes is NOT the answer).

Once a political idea takes hold it takes years to combat. Anybody who is in any doubt about this should read the following IEEE report on windfarms with particular regard to Germany where the solar PV fiasco has reached epic proportions:

http://spectrum.ieee.org/energy/renewables/a-skeptic-looks-at-alternative-energy/0

The fact is, PV in Germany is less than 10% efficient due to the lack of sunlight in northern latitudes, against 80-90% delivery efficiency for conventional power plant.

When comparing installed capacity, keen eco warriors somehow forget to mention that factor of 8x between PV and conventional when they are extolling the relative cost effectiveness of the two sources of power. They also forget the huge capital investment costs and subsidies. All this money is being poured wastefully into a technology that is inherently useless for northern climates.
Posted by cosserat@...
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
PV is Useless? Think again cosserat..
Well, somebody obviously had a heaping bowl of ignorant flakes for breakfast.... while it is only common sense that solar panels located in places that receive less sunshine than other more sunny locales produce less electricity, this has less to do with latitude and more to do with weather patterns. I live in Seattle, WA (hardly known for being a sunny place), but we have very sunny and LONG summer days. I also happen to have a 3.8kw PV system installed on my roof. Want to know how many kWh of electricity I produce every year? roughly 3,550 kWh. This translates into roughly 93% efficiency (of production) from my system's rated output. My 7% "loss" is due mostly to my panels E/SE orientation (rather than a true south facing orientation). Seattle receives approximately the same number of hours of sunshine as Houston, TX (much further south). Eastern WA state gets almost as much sunshine as southern CA. PV installed in this northern state can generate about the same amount of electricity as PV installed in ANY sunnier state in the southern part of the US. So, go back to your cave, you ignorant troll.
Posted by tinhart
Updated - 19th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Useless?
That fiasco of epic proportions is capable of producing 1/2 of Germany's required power (under the right conditions), so 1+ more fiascos plus a viable energy storage solution, and the country could be free of the need to purchase energy from any foreign source. Is that not a goal worth pursuing?
Posted by Jonchamp
16th Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!