Follow this blog:
RSS

Global renewable energy investment surpasses fossil fuels

By | November 27, 2011, 6:14 PM PST

A coal fired power plant in Northport, New York. Image credit: Wikipedia

A coal fired power plant in Northport, New York. Many coal power plants are being decommissioned in favor of natural gas. Image credit: Wikipedia

Global investment into renewable energy sources has for the first time surpassed monies spent on fossil fuel power plants, Bloomberg New Energy Finance has found.

Biomass, solar, wave, and wind installations drew approximately US$187 billion last year, according to the report. In contrast, a total of $157 billion was invested into traditional power sources. Bloomberg published its findings on Friday.

We’ve been following domestic renewable investments in the United States over the past year. U.S. venture capital investment into renewables cleared the $1 billion mark for fourth quarter of 2010.

In April, market research firm Cleantech Group published a report, which found that venture capital money is flowing into green technology at the highest level since the company began to monitor global investment in 2002.

While the report shows that renewables have cleared the threshold, “dirty” power plants are remain the most predominant energy workhorses. Renewables are currently account for just 4 percent of grid power (not including hydropower, 7%).

Coal is currently king in the United States, trailed by a nearly equal proportion of natural gas and nuclear power generation. Some energy industry watchers forecast that natural gas will rule the future.

Investment into natural gas power stations is increasing as coal becomes less desirable, and is forecasted to become the U.S’s top source of electricity. Government subsidies will fund building a new generation of nuclear power plants.

Personally, I’d put an asterisk on any predication because the future is a very fluid thing. The ongoing UN Climate negotiations may be floundering, but the realities of climate change may eventually prompt more dramatic diplomatic action.

Pair that urgency with the falling cost of solar power, and renewables may become a bigger part of the energy in the future (at least in countries that do have a national energy strategy).

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

David Worthington

About David Worthington

David Worthington is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

David Worthington

David Worthington

Contributing Editor

David Worthington has written for BetaNews, eWeek, PC World, Technologizer and ZDNet. Formerly, he was a senior editor at SD Times. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

David Worthington

David Worthington

David does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers. Occasionally he consults for other companies; should David cover a topic in which a client is involved, he will disclose this fact in his writing. His views do not represent those of ScaleOut Software.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Whither the $187 billion
How much of that is government / government subsidized vs. the same for the oil and gas industry? We're about to hit 'peak renewables' if frakking keeps bearing fruit. Any renewable investment that can't hack it with $100 a barrel oil is not going to survive when the price of oil goes back under $50.
Posted by StyleDoggie
28th Nov 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
You're dreaming ...
if you think the price of oil will drop under $50/barrel again. And the oil and gas industry receive far more subsidies than renewables.
Posted by riverat1
29th Nov 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Lies, Damned Lies and Statistics
Do you know how to tell when Bloomberg or his associates are lying? Their lips are moving. Not one statistic or number in this article is stated in accurate context. This is a typical example of Bloomberg's attempts at social engineering, meant to convince readers of so-called facts that are simply untrue, to push a bankrupt social agenda.
Posted by jhaksch
29th Nov 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!