Follow this blog:
RSS

From Fukushima’s home country: Nuclear will double

By | June 22, 2012, 4:21 AM PDT

General Electric Hitachi bases its PRISM reactor on the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (above) that the U.S. operated in Idaho until 1994.

Japanese industrial conglomerate Hitachi Ltd., has boldly predicted that it will more than double sales of nuclear power plants by 2020.

The company is targeting $4.5 billion (360 billion yen) in sales by fiscal year 2020, up from $1.5 billion (120 billion yen) in 2011, according to a management plan it released last week.

The growth projection is notable coming from a company in Japan, where the 2011 meltdowns at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant caused the evacuation of some 200,000 people and led to a temporary shutdown of all 54 nuclear stations. Reactors melted down after a devastating tsunami knocked out generators that powered Fukushima Daiichi’s cooling systems.

But Hitachi is not counting on domestic growth. In a presentation accompanying its management plan, it said it would “accelerate overseas development of the nuclear power systems business,” and that it is a positioning nuclear power “as an effective source of energy for curbing CO2 emissions to meet continuing global demand.”

MarketWatch reported that Hitachi will benefit from “cashing in on an expected rise in worldwide demand” for nuclear power (The article misstates the sales prediction as millions instead of billions).

Countries including China and India plan to expand nuclear’s contribution to their energy sources. China is even grabbing up the world’s uranium supply to help it secure a nuclear future.

Hitachi develops and sells nuclear reactors and services through its partnership with General Electric, called General Electric Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH). GEH is developing a safer form of its conventional boiling water reactor, and is also developing an alternative reactor known as a fast neutron reactor (FNR) which would burn plutonium waste from other reactors and thus represent a method for both generating power and eliminating a dangerous byproduct.

GEH calls its FNR “PRISM” and bases it on the Experimental Breeder Reactor II that the U.S. operated until 1994 in Idaho.

FNRs have been historically difficult to run safely.  Bill Gates TerraPower is developing a type of FNR called a traveling wave reactor. San Diego’s General Atomics is also developing one called the Energy Multiplier Module.

A number of other alternative nuclear designs are emerging that could challenge conventional water-cooled, uranium fueled reactors. They include reactors that run on thorium instead of uranium (GEH has never answered my inquiries as to whether they’re researching thorium). Japanese utility Chubu Electric Power Co. recently announced it is investigating thorium as a safe nuclear alternative.

A handful of startup companies including Lawrenceville Plasma Physics have also reported advances in nuclear fusion, the elusive holy grail of energy generation.

In its management plan, Hitachi also said it is participating in the decommissioning of Fukushima, and that it is developing safety features for Japanese nuclear plants.

Meanwhile, Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda  last weekend ordered the restart of two nuclear reactors. Before the nationwide shutdowns, nuclear had provided 30 percent of the country’s electricity.

Photo: Argonne National Laboratory - West, via Wikimedia.

An explosion of nuclear insights on SmartPlanet:

An alternative nuclear update:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Can nuclear compete on cost?
The question I have is given how the cost curve for solar power has been changing will nuclear be able to even compete with it in a few years.
Posted by riverat1
22nd Jun
0 Votes
+ -
solar?
Without some cheap means of storing massive amounts of energy, solar can only be a minor part of the energy supply.
Posted by wwoods6
28th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
Can renewables ever meet the ideal energy goal?
The arithmetic really does work for Breeder Reactors - they are capable of supplying all of the energy needs (including carbon-neutral liquid fuels for transport and carbon-neutral ammonia as feed stock for nitrate fertilisers, to be able to feed 9 billion), for every individual on the planet (at developed world standards), for all of time (from inexhaustible thorium and uranium fuels).

To believe that a spaghetti-like interconnection of windmills and plastic squares can achieve this ideal goal, is insane.

Google: "benefits of lftrs" to get onside with this technology
Posted by Lftrsuk
23rd Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!