Follow this blog:
RSS

Facebook plans sub-Arctic data center

By | October 28, 2011, 2:11 AM PDT

Data centers are huge CO2 emitters, and Facebook runs big ones. Its latest solution: cold bytes from northern Sweden.

In an effort to reduce its significant carbon footprint, Facebook is getting cooler.

The mega social media site is building a data center near the Arctic Circle in Lulea, Sweden, where the chilly temperatures will provide natural cooling and slash electricity normally required to run cooling systems.

Data centers could exceed airlines for CO2 emissions by 2020, consulting firm McKinsey has estimated. Conventional cooling can contribute up to 70 percent of a data center’s energy profile.

Facebook’s move to Lulea echoes a recent decision by U.S. data services firm Datapipe to set up shop in Iceland. In addition to cooling benefits, the N. Atlantic island offers 100 percent renewable energy that comes from hydroelectric and geothermal sources. Icelandic utilities also offer fixed electricity prices for as long as 20 years – an attraction compared to rising and volatile fossil fuel-based electricity tariffs.

Back in Sweden, the Lulea site will be Facebook’s first non-U.S. data center. It will help serve the European, African and Middle Eastern constituents of Facebook’s 800 million active users - all of whom contribute to the company’s greenhouse gas profile, let’s not forget. Lulea is in northeast Sweden along the Gulf of Bothnia, just south of the Arctic Circle (see map, left).

According to the BBC, the facility will require 70 percent less power than normal and will span 30,000 square meters (323,000 square feet), about 11 soccer fields. The Daily Mail says it’s scheduled for completion in 2014.

Images: Wikimedia

More cold bytes:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Well...
I gusee the routers, switches, hubs etc connecting Lulea with the rest of the world don't use any power.
Posted by jtdavies
28th Oct 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
some things always need power
Of course they'll require power. The big issue here is the cost of cooling the whole operation. If you are in a cooler climate then you can use some of that natural coolness to replace artificial cooling. Since cooling the data center is a large part of operating costs then anything they do there is going to significantly decrease operating expenses. This is just a simple way to lower costs, not eliminate them.
Posted by boomchuck1
28th Oct 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Cogeneration
Hasn't FaceBook ever heard of co-generation. It would make even more economic sense to use that excess heat to produce products (hydroponics and aquaculture products that don't have to be transported with peak fuel to colder climates for example) - before dumping it into the environment. You still have the heat, but you get more necessities out of it before it becomes waste heat - which saves it being generated somewhere else.

Global atmospheric heat inputs are generally cumulative - whether you dump it in the Arctic Circle or at the equator. Dumping heat in the Arctic Circle however has to contribute more to local (micro climate) ice melting (and nearby ice caps) and cumulatively to climate change. How about an orbital data center where the heat is dumped out of the atmosphere where it really doesn't affect climate - you know a real high "cloud."
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
Updated - 29th Oct 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!