Follow this blog:
RSS

ENERGY STAR: shooting high enough?

By | March 22, 2010, 12:27 PM PDT

Air conditioners will be humming across the country within a few weeks.

Hopefully, the notorious BTU-guzzlers will don the ENERGY STAR label, which certifies them as having a particular energy efficiency level.

These products aren’t hard to find. Any successful certification scheme must be recognizable, and more than 40,000 appliances and fixtures are branded with the blue-and-white star.

Still, a recent survey by Ecoalign reports:

The Energy Star brand remains strong, but it may be losing a bit of its edge. There may be issues of differentiation in an increasingly crowded market focused on energy efficiency, energy savings and environmental messaging.

Such branding competition includes HOMESTAR and EPEAT.

As climate change and recession concerns loom, shoppers also want more from the label. More than 90 percent of surveyed participants would prefer it if the program ranked products according to efficiency. This way customers could compare Energy Star items more readily.

Choosing the creme de la creme in energy-saving goods may have Americans lowering their utility bills by even more than the $17 billion they saved last year through Energy Star products, according to a statement released Friday.

Of course, along with recognizing a certification brand, consumers must also be able to trust it.

The Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Energy have announced new plans for bolstering the Energy Star name through expanded testing and enforcement.

In the last four months, the EPA and DOE have put 35 manufacturers on the spot for failing to live up to the label’s standard. Examples include:

  • Removing the Energy Star label from 20 LG refrigerator-freezer models. (LG is also in trouble in Australia after a consumer group found an illegal device in two LG fridge model that enabled them to make false efficiency claims.)
  • Disqualifying 34 compact fluorescent light bulbs from 25 manufacturers.
  • Taking action against 6 shower head producers for not meeting federal water conservation standards.
  • Revoking the partnership with US Inc/US Refrigeration for “a history of logo misuse, unresponsiveness, and pattern of failure to comply with Energy Star program guidelines.”


Image:
Flickr_macwagen and Energy Star

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!