Follow this blog:
RSS

Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?

By | March 11, 2010, 11:04 AM PST

Ice can burn. Not only your skin as dry ice does, but actually burn.

Combustible ice, or natural gas hydrate, contains methane within its frozen lattice structure. When melted or depressurized, the ice turns to—you guessed it—water and natural gas.

A cubic meter of combustible ice is roughly equivalent to 164 cubic meters of natural gas.

But how much of this energy source is lying beneath the Earth’s permafrost and seafloors is unknown and often debated. Past Department of Energy (DOE) estimates have placed the worldwide methane hydrate total as high as 400 million trillion cubic feet. That’s right, I wrote ‘million trillion.’

Chinese researchers found some of it in September on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. During a National People’s Congress session last weekend, Quinghai’s Governor Luo Huining announced there will be increased exploration in his province for what might be an emerging energy source.

A Xinhua article reports:

‘Combustible ice’ reserves on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau are estimated to equal at least 35 billion tonnes of oil, which could supply energy to China for 90 years.

But China shouldn’t get too excited. The technology is lagging.

The United States has also been researching methane hydrate deposits in Alaska’s North Slope and in the Gulf of Mexico. The DOE has identified stumbling blocks including finding where exactly the ice is, how much there is, and how to safely get it. Digging up the ice is not the plan. They would melt the ice underground first, and then extract the gas.

There are also ecological concerns such as habitat destruction, seabed drilling and methane (a potent greenhouse gas) leakage.

From a National Academy of Sciences report published in January:

Critical questions remain in several areas, including the most appropriate production technologies, inadequate understanding of the environmental consequences, and the expected volumes of recoverable methane resulting from production of methane from methane hydrate.

Natural seepage of methane from methane hydrate has always occurred, but understanding the impacts of methane on the global environment and natural methane leakage from methane hydrate reservoirs is an enormous scientific challenge.

Want to see how potent methane-filled permafrost is? Here’s an incredible video of researchers from the University of Alaska Fairbanks lighting ice on fire:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor, Energy

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
15
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
You've got to be kidding me. Will we not be satisfied until we've combusted literally ALL sources of non-renewable energy and thrown ALL of the exhaust into the atmosphere? Shouldn't we be looking for ways to keep hydrocarbons in the ground (or under the water)? Must we dig it all up? This article belongs in the "Dumbplanet" website, not "Smartplanet".
Posted by gmantel
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
The methane
will escape into the atmosphere naturally anyway, and is 25 X more potant than CO2 as a greenhouse gass Finding a way to harvest it and use it for power generation will render it harmless to the environment & relinquish our dependence on oil & the Islamic regimes that control it.
By the way it is naturally constantly renewable.
Posted by TonyTrenton
Updated - 29th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
But how much exists free from soil. We can't afford to burn dirt. I
suspect the answer is none.
Posted by shanedr
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
Natural gas and methane can also be used in fuel cells. Several companies have developed this technology and the resultant products are much less polluting than combustion.
Posted by franklapiana
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
I thought we all would have already learned our lesson about digging up long-locked deposits of carbon and re-releasing it into the carbon cycle. But apparently not.

No matter now "clean" it is, you're not going to avoid the fact that you'll be releasing one atom of carbon for every atom of methane you dig out. Having that carbon be in carbon dioxide instead of some poison (like carbon monoxide) is "cleaner", it's not innocuous.
Posted by AySz88
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
whoa, hey, bad idea
Besides, climate from burning other sequestered gasses will soon be
melting/releasing all of that for us soon anyway.
Posted by Hobyx
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
Methane from permafrost and methane from deep clathrates are different
The video above shows methane being released from decomposition of organic matter in permafrost as it melts. This is recently produced methane - and it is quite different from the methane clathrates locked in immense sea floor deposits, and which may also be present in very cold deep lakes. Those deposits, which are present in many parts of the ocean, e.g., the continental shelf off of the Carolinas, hold ancient methanes.
The recently produced methane is a result of ongoing warming, and is a positive feedback factor accelerating it. It is almost certainly not recoverable for any use, since it is being produced over a vast area, like the other major methane sources: wetlands, rice paddies, animal husbandry, etc.
Posted by macmcf
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
For those who decry using fossil fuels: there's an
experimental process to convert the CO2 given off by
burning methane or coal back into, basically, cement.

A safer way to lock up carbon, I can't imagine.
Posted by Jkirk3279
12th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
Can you imagine as much the dangers as the possibilities that this can cause? That is to say, if we take into account the energy crisis that faces world, you could consider this discovery like a healthy substitute of the petroleum and the coal like as energy material. On the other hand, the eminent separation of the polar caps of the two poles agrees with to "wet the pants." Since if it is not water, it will be fire what will kill us...
Posted by ERRM130578
13th Mar 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
Cement
Given the amount of carbon released by fuel burning of any sort (though particularly coal), locking it all up "in cement" would produce so much tonnage of cement that the international demand for it would be unable to keep up.

Existing cement companies would go bankrupt and excess cement would be dumped unceremoniously into the ocean, raising sea-levels so drastically we'd be forced to live on floating pylons, and wiping out all deep-sea life, dangerously destabilizing the ecosystem which sustains us.

Ultimately we'd be reduced to driving around in motorboats shooting at each other and devouring our own children for food.

So you see, "clean carbon" technology makes you a cannibal.

It's all very logical.
Posted by Maxwell Evans
13th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
SmartPlanet? Intelligent Energy??
Oh what a bad idea. Bad, bad idea. And this article should have been titled 'Why is combustible ice in our future?'

Manmade or not, Climate Change is releasing another greenhouse gas, fact.

Should we use it as fuel and release the slightly-less-dangerous CO2 from it or let it escape to accelerate our demise? Its coming out anyway, its dangerous and unfortunately its free energy in the eyes of the world's governments.

Clathrates should be seen as a threat to be dealt with, not a bonus.

I have a question - like extracting water from aquifers, wont this cause subsidence over huge topolgies? A million trillion tons of clathrate occupies an enormous amount of space under millions of trillions of tons of soil, remove it and you have a void.

Globally, the extraction of groundwater has been shown to do exactly that - but hey, we need water now so we'll just ignore that.

So now we propose to rip up the Arctic Tundra and swathes of old Siberia, grub in the bottom of all our ancient lakes and destroy the breeding grounds of thousands of marine species looking for something to burn? Did we learn nothing from coil and oil?

I say no.
Posted by SiO2
14th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
To Everyone Saying "it's a bad idea"
Do you drive to the coffee shop where you log on to the internet to comment on how bad an idea it is to burn fossil fuels? I'll put more credence into your opinions when you start saying things such as "rather than putting this much energy into looking for ways to harvest another source of combustible fuel, we should be spending that time and money on research into more efficient alternatives such as hybrid vehicles and better ways of producing ethanol."
Until then, I think it's a good source of energy- and given the fact that the burning ice is located in China, and also given China's apparently lenient outlook on things such as the environment, they're going to find a way to dig it up anyway, so we should find some way to get in on the action, while the getting is good. If we don't, we will become a slave to China the way we've become a slave to the Middle East- just over a different kind of fuel.At least this is a cleaner burning fuel.
www.dfwsupergeek.com
Posted by unclefixer@...
15th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
The negative reactions I read above betray an ignorance and pessimism that is depressing. Further research on the web into methane hydrates, and similar deposits of new energy caches would reveal vast quantities of these resources just waiting for the right technology to safely and cleanly exploit them.

One example I have read about describes vast deposits on the floor of the Gulf of Mexico (and another story describes similar deposits in the Asian North Pacific). Possible extraction methods under study, appear to kill two birds with one technology: So as not to destroy the beds where these deposits lie, it has been proposed to inject CO2 to replace the methane that is extracted. This seems to me to cause for optimism rather then the negativity espoused above.

I wish I had the time to dig up the links I have seen, but they're out there for those who want to learn something and not whine about the environment.

Otherwise, let's just pull up the covers and go back to sleep. The Chinese will figure it all out and sell it to us at inflated prices.
Posted by psquare11
16th Mar 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
Once again we see the tree-hugger mentality damming all use of our natural resources for our benefit. We need to drill, mine, and dig to use our own oil, gas, coal, etc, and stop sending all our $$ to the arabs who then use it to finance terrorism on our soil, and increasing our national debt. Time to throw out the liberals and get conservatives in office to fix the economy that the Dem's have ruined. Wake up to reality!!
Posted by jim_d@...
21st Jul 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Energy on the rocks: is combustible ice in our future?
If Methane is ten times worse than CO2, isn't this the best reason ever to keep it frozen over?? Thanks for the article Melissa.
Posted by charmaine57
30th Aug 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!