Follow this blog:
RSS

DOE bets on sunny future for US solar power

By | February 7, 2011, 4:00 AM PST

The Department of Energy swung for the sun on Friday, announcing a plan to make solar power more affordable. The SunShot Initiative is another effort to advance President Obama’s clean energy push.

SunShot, an allusion to President Kennedy’s “moon shot” quest of sending someone to the moon, is trying to launch solar power into better price competition with coal and our solar industry into better competition internationally. The initiative has its sights on lowering utility scale solar installation costs by 75 percent.

CNET quotes Energy Secretary Steven Chu:

If it gets down to $1 per watt, it really means that you’re generating electricity that’s comparable to or lower than other sources of generating electricity, so it becomes the low-cost option. We want this to be competitive without subsidies.

Getting solar costs down to what Chu says would be roughly six cents per kilowatt-hour would require boosts in how solar cells can convert sunlight to electricity and how manufacturers produce the solar systems. Chu went on to say that either thin-film solar materials need to become more efficient or silicon cell manufacturers need to waste less silicon.

Nine domestic solar companies received $27 million to improve solar cell technology, installation performance, manufacturing efficiency, or permitting processes. Most of the funds ($20.3 million) went to the manufacturing front.

The AP reports:

Many U.S. solar industry advocates have long complained that the Chinese government’s support of its solar companies has enabled its companies to take market share from U.S. manufacturers.

Chinese companies such as Suntech Power Holdings Co have made inroads into both European and U.S. markets, and now supply about two-thirds of the global market. Suntech said on Thursday it had sold 250 megawatts of panels in North America last year, about 25 percent of the total market.

The DOE sent the remaining $7 million of the funds toward quickening the solar tech’s pace between development and commercialization. The big winner under this category was Crystal Solar. The California-based company will get $4 million to find a cheaper way to produce and handle thin silicon wafers. Using less silicon, the agency says the single crystal silicon wafers are four times thinner than standard solar cells.

The other three recipients under this umbrella were also from California. Caelux hopes to lessen the amount of semiconducting material used in flexible solar cells. Solexant will source materials that are neither rare nor toxic, and Stion will focus on stacking two high-efficiency solar devices for better light absorption.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Image: NASA

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor, Energy

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DOE bets on sunny future for US solar power
I wonder.
Did Edison get federal funding to invent the light bulb?
Did Marconi get federal funding to invent the radio?
Did Henry Ford get federal money to develop the Model T?

If "solar" is really an effective technology it will not need all of this forcing. And if it really works, it needs an Environmental Evaluation because it will divert the suns heat from striking the earth.
Posted by pauc1
7th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
And the Internet?
The Internet wouldn't exist without DARPA funding. Just because an invention requires external investment does not automatically make it a waste of money.

BTW, loads of federal money was spent on the national highway system.
Posted by scripter
7th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DOE bets on sunny future for US solar power
Much of the modern technology has its roots in the funding from DARPA, NASA, NIH, etc. Business usually doesn't get involved until there is a clear way to make money on something.

Solar energy will never cover enough area to "divert the sun's heat" in any significant way. I saw an estimate once that a single solar photovoltaic array of about 40x40 miles would produce as much electricity as the whole world currently uses. That's not that big considering the surface area of the Earth.
Posted by riverat1
7th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DOE bets on sunny future for US solar power
The prototype of the internet was ARPANET - DARPA without the D. It wasn't just government funding, it was a public-private partnership in response to a government requirement.
I suppose someone could come up with histories of inventions to support just about any position, but the thing that strikes me about Edison, Marconi & Ford is that I don't recall any of there work being in response to an urgent national need like the current push to develop solar power.
Posted by hoodedswan
8th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Dispersed power generation is a missed opportunity in the USA.
The solar industry and the government are missing a huge opportunity in building codes.

Decades ago Israel mandated solar hot water heating for all new home construction. What is preventing the US from doing something similar in appropriate regions of the country?

They could start a trend with 3 regulations in appropriate states where weather conditions are conducive to solar power. California and the entire southern states region comes to mind.

First ? Require that solar panels and batteries power the exterior lighting on all new homes.

Second ? Require that the solar power systems installed to meet this requirement must be modular. This way home owners have the option to additional batteries, panels, etc, to power all of or a larger percentage of the home with solar power.

Third ? Require that all new homes be equipped to feed power to the local grid once their batteries are charged.

A basic system that can power a few exterior lights with expansion capability is available off the shelf today for less than $1,000 plus installation. The equipment to connect to the grid can run another $1,000. $2,000 would be a drop in the bucket on a new $200,000 home.

Simple market forces would eventually drive the cost of those systems down. Tax rebates, a favorite of politicians, should be given only for the purchase of US made products. Why go through the trouble to ban the importation of a product? Just do not give the consumers of import products the tax break.

With all of the electricity used in these states for air conditioning the solar power could supplement the grid when it needs it most after the batteries are charged for the night.

Maybe then the US will see the green jobs that are supposed to pull us out of this recession.
Posted by Hates Idiots
8th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: DOE bets on sunny future for US solar power
I really dont see why we dont invest in not solar farms but but apllying these large scale solar zones on top of every Wal-Mart, Lowes, Home Depot and whateverr box store is out there. Go a step further and are require even more businesses and new homes builds have a certain percentage of their roofing be solar. This is a great technolgy that everyone should be part of. We must get away from foreign fuel but we need clean furl the most. We have landfills with technology to break down garbage and turn it into fuel, both methane and diesel and gas. this make me question, why dont we acquire all trash we can and convert it, I'm not advocating fossil fuels here but into everything is in place, lets keep the furl puchase here instead of paying other nations and weakening our dollar. BUY USA
Posted by CommanderWinslow
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Some companys doing that.
I am drawing a blank on which gasoline brand it is, but a local franchise owner is thinking in that direction by putting solar panels on all of his gas pump canopy?s. He has about 20 stations in the New England area.

On a sunny day each station produces enough electricity to cover his pumps and most of the refrigeration in the convenience store. I think the ROI was 2 years.

Once he upgrades his store refrigeration units to newer, more efficient models, he will be selling power back to the grid or directing it to vehicle charging stations if EVs sales take off.
Posted by Hates Idiots
11th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!