Follow this blog:
RSS

Cut PC energy use by 99%: Use a memristor

By | May 21, 2012, 3:38 AM PDT

That's not your grandma's knitting. It's an atomic force microscope image of 17 memristors, courtesy of HP Lab's J.J. Yang, via Wikimedia. A London team thinks it has figured out a better weave. Or more precisely, a better material.

PC and gadget users - ie, anyone reading this story - collectively contribute to global CO2 emissions probably more than the airline industry does. Every time billions of us plug in, recharge, refresh, retrieve, reboot, download, upload, store, save, italicize, underline, boldface, capitalize, minimize, maximize, delete, surf, click or stream  (you get the picture), we are drawing energy.

Now, a London-led research team thinks it has found a way to slash the energy consumption of at least some of our computing functions by 99 percent.

The key: Use a different material to make “memristors.”

Memristors are the elusive electronics components that are supposed to soon replace other semiconductor and memory technologies to support faster and denser memory. They are both memory chips and resistors rolled into one circuit.

Leon Chua at the University of California Berkeley first hypothesized memristors 41 years ago, but no one successfully made a working laboratory version until 2008, when HP announced a breakthrough. Two years later, HP entered a joint venture with chip maker Hynix and targeted commerical production by 2013.

The problem, as a story on the BBC website points out, is that memristors require “expensive or exotic materials.”

University College London to the rescue! Forget the exotic materials. Instead, use a close relative of silicon called silicon oxides, says UCL’s Anthony Kenyon, who led a collaborative research team from the UK, France and Spain.

“That would make them easy and cheap to integrate into existing manufacturing techniques,” the BBC reports, in summarizing the team’s findings.

The crew serendipitously stumbled upon the idea while looking into silicon for LEDs.

Kenyon and his student Adnan Mehonic discussed their work at the European Materials Research Society conference in Strasbourg, France last week.

“As they described …, the energy required to switch the state of their devices - the energy it would take to store or retrieve a bit of information - is just a hundredth of that in existing flash memory, and significantly faster,” the BBC writes.

In other words, you could potentially slash energy consumption by 99 percent every time you hit the “open file” or “save” button on your computer.

Multiply that by the number of PC and gadget junkies in the word, and the planet’s CO2 footrpint could lose at least a couple of toes, if not a heel. This sounds like an idea worth kicking into action.

Note: An earlier version of this story stated that HP was the first to hypothesize memristors, in 1971. In fact Leon Chua of the University of California Berkeley was the first to describe a memristor. HP was the first to make one, decades after Chua’s 1971 seminal paper. Corrected at 11:00 a.m. PDT, May 21.

More energetic chip, material and gadget insights on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mark Halper

About Mark Halper

Mark Halper is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Contributing Editor

Mark Halper has written for TIME, Fortune, Financial Times, the UK's Independent on Sunday, Forbes, New York Times, Wired, Variety and The Guardian. He is based in Bristol, U.K.

Follow him on Twitter.

Mark Halper

Mark Halper

Mark has no financial holdings in the companies he writes about. He occasionally travels at the expense of companies or their press relations agencies in order to report on a company or industry event related to it; Mark will prominently disclose this information when appropriate. This relationship will have no influence on his coverage. Companies he covers do not get to review columns in advance, or select or reject topics.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
No reduction of 99%
However...computer memory (storage, reading/writing) doesn't consume the bulk of the power.
Posted by Parsec300
21st May
+1 Vote
+ -
Not even close.
Even if the memristor cuts down the energy usage of solid state memory access by 99%, how about the energy needed for the monitor? or hard drive? or dvd drive? or fan? or...
Posted by jimofil
21st May
+1 Vote
+ -
I wonder what my carbon footprint today would be...
...if we didn't have computers. Many times what it is currently, I am sure. My commute to a workplace alone would require more energy than all my computers use all day.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
21st May
+1 Vote
+ -
Does this really save anything?
I have to ask, will most people actually be saving energy? Or will the industry just come up with more ways for the customers to waste more energy for less money?
Posted by Crash2100
Updated - 21st May
-2 Votes
+ -
The Carbon foot Print, True or Profit.
Another Hi tech way of making money. If we are going to save energy, it has to be for society not profit. There are ways to save energy that are in larger chunks than this. The powers that be, are not going to let them surface, as the profit in them reduces there chunk. Solar power cells on our roofs is one. Small wind powered turbines on our roofs, and more efficent windows in our homes, are all within the grasp of the masses. However if there is no profit, no movement. If profit was secondary, more could be done in the short term to bring work and better life to many. Profit will rise as the small systems connect with each other, this requires forthought, is that what is missing. Or as humans we cant work together.
Posted by Askerape
22nd May
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!