Follow this blog:
RSS

Chinese firm may control Obama stimulus recipient

By | August 9, 2012, 8:17 PM PDT

A123 could soon be unable to meet operating expenses.

A U.S. battery maker that was the receipt of several hundred million dollars in stimulus-backed funds could soon be under the control of a Chinese auto parts company. This could become a political liability for the Obama administration.

Yesterday, A123 Systems announced that it had signed a non-binding memorandum of understanding with China’s Wanxiang Group for a US$450 million investment in return for an 80 percent stake in the company, which U.S. taxpayers helped to finance.

A123 received a $249.1 million grant from the Department of Energy to build its battery concept shorter after its IPO in 2009, but commercial success has remained elusive. This past year wrought multiple recall programs, poor sales, and an investor class action lawsuit. It is now veering toward bankruptcy.

Yesterday, the company reported an $82.9 million net loss in its shareholder filings and disclosed that it anticipated major cash flow problems. Q2 revenues fall 53 percent over the last quarter. The company lost $55.4 million in Q2 last year.

The bankruptcy of Solyndra, a manufacturer of thin-film solar panels, rapidly became a focal point for political opposition. I’ve previously referred to A123 as Solyndra 2.0, and expect that its ‘failure’ will inspire harsh criticism of the Stimulus program.

Green jobs remain a centerpiece of President Obama’s economic agenda, so it’s unsurprising that Congressional Republicans, including standard-bearer Mitt Romney, uniformly oppose renewable energy subsidies. The renewables category has effectively been politicized, and some policy experts say Solyndra’s failure places future energy investment at risk.

Last week, Mitt Romney called for an end to renewable energy tax credits, which are generally associated with President Obama. Ironically, the tax credits Mr. Romney now opposes were established during the George H. Bush administration. A123’s potential future as a Chinese subsidiary adds some validity to that position.

It is important to note that A123’s DOE grant will not turn up in a bank in China. “Federal funds can only be used for building factories in North America and the creation of jobs, and that’s what’s been done,” CEO David Vieau told Bloomberg.

Regardless of that restriction, this is especially harsh election year, and there are many videos on YouTube of Present Obama and Nancy Pelosi standing in front of A123 Systems’ plants. It’s a safe bet that a Chinese company acquiring a controlling interest in a Stimulus recipient could become fodder for an attack ad.

(Image credit: Library of Congress)

Related on SmartPlanet:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

David Worthington

About David Worthington

David Worthington is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

David Worthington

David Worthington

Contributing Editor

David Worthington has written for BetaNews, eWeek, PC World, Technologizer and ZDNet. Formerly, he was a senior editor at SD Times. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

David Worthington

David Worthington

David does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers. Occasionally he consults for other companies; should David cover a topic in which a client is involved, he will disclose this fact in his writing. His views do not represent those of ScaleOut Software.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+8 Votes
+ -
How did you not know this?
That has been public knowledge for some time now. They have quietly owned a smaller percentage for some time. This is an expansion of their ownership influence.

The list of stimulus money that went overseas is huge and costly to US taxpayers.

$3 billion in stimulus money went to build a new GM car/truck plant in Brazil.

The Solyndra money was used to buy Photon Solar in India. Which then took over filling the $4 billion in PG&E PV orders for 2 solar farms being built in southern California with taxpayer funds. Orders that Solyndra received only because they were the only bidder with a production plant in California. A condition of the contracts was supposed to be the panel production jobs stayed in the state, but Governor Brown waived it when the California plant closed.

Fisker Automotive received more than $500 million in stimulus money when they were looking to buy a closed GM plant on the east coast. When that deal fell through, because the government overseer killed it, the Obama administration gave Fisker the OK to spend the money on a plant in Europe.

The list of crony capitalism loans and grants goes on and on.

You are a little late to the party, but it is nice to see eyes finally opening.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 10th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: How did you not know this?
Don't forget the new Cadillac engineering and design facility in China... And then there's the already established flow pattern: http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2012/08/12/outsourcer-in-chief-obama-of-general-motors/
Posted by GregGold
Updated - 13th Aug
+4 Votes
+ -
Only seems fair.
After all, a fair chunk of that "stimulus" money (at least the part that wasn't just printed) came from China. The Chinese Communists wouldn't so freely just loan us the better part of a trillion dollars at such attractive rates unless there was going to be a sizable return for them. As it's played out, it appears as though the "stimulus" was far more stimulating for China's economy than ours.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 10th Aug
+5 Votes
+ -
So really?
Failed and wrong ideas are the hallmark of the Obama administration.
Posted by BitwiseCGU
10th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
Remember Japan?
Until the 90's, Japan was buying up property in the US like China is doing now. It used to be a joke about the poor quality of Japanese goods; part of that was due to Japanese engineering that worked hard to reduce components in radios and TVs to lower the cost. Then the quality improved to the point that having something made in Japan was better than that made in the US.

The US managers went to Japan to see what they did that made them so successful in business. It turned out that the Japanese used American business management techniques from the 1950's. The American business response was to explore theory X and theory Y as well as "high tech/high touch" to improve business.

Chinese made goods are following the same curve as Japanese goods did; currently China is a huge source for cheaply made goods. The problem seems to be that we in the US fail to learn from history.
Posted by sboverie
10th Aug
-2 Votes
+ -
So What!
If the company stays afloat, hires American workers, creates more jobs and pays it taxes who cares who owns and runs the company. Compared to other American companies who received stimulus money and went belly-up, this Chinese owned company is set for strong financial backing. I thought we were a nation that believes in free trade and an open economy! Jingoism has no place in a vibrant, global economy!
Posted by wmpryor
10th Aug
+2 Votes
+ -
If recent history is any indication.
They will take the technology, close the US plant and go on to dominate the market while creating jobs in China.

Keep in mind, there are really no private companies in China. The government has a stake in everything and directly gets part of the profits. Why charge taxes when you can be an owner?

Unlike elected officials in the US, they care about creating jobs at home.
Posted by Hates Idiots
11th Aug
0 Votes
+ -
Or
They may follow the lead of the Japanese and produce product for the North American market here, because it makes good economic sense. Plus, they have reasons to want to prop up the American economy - they're heavily invested in it.
Posted by Greenknight_z
11th Aug
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!