Follow this blog:
RSS

Building a better windmill through design

By | November 29, 2010, 5:58 PM PST

Shrouded turbine modules collect wind at varying speeds and heights along the full length of the tower. This is a mock-up of the upcoming prototype.

Shrouded turbine modules collect wind at varying speeds and heights along the full length of the tower. This is a mock-up of the upcoming prototype.

Windmills have assumed the same basic form for centuries: long vertical axles crowned with rectangle-shaped blades. Now, a start-up is preparing to exceed 10 megawatts (MW) this summer by utilizing wind along the full length of a tower.

Nearly 12 years ago, inventor Kevin Friesth set out to build a better windmill. Friesth envisioned a honeycomb like design where a taller tower is adorned with modular, shrouded turbines along a vertical axis. The net effect is a lower cost per megawatt.

Friesth partnered with angel investors from Splitrock Capital, a private investment company based in South Dakota, nearly five years ago. A prototype was built in secrecy at Reese Air Force Base in Lubbock, Texas, following two years of computer-aided simulations, he said.

Splitrock Capital formed Splitrock Wind, and took the opportunity to stealthily obtain patents, and plot out its business model. It is in the process of formalizing its patents internationally, Friesth said.

The Splitrock design is intended to be fault tolerant – for offshore applications. The tower includes an elevator with a built-in crane so that it is self-serviceable by hand, Friesth explained. “If you lose one turbine out of 30, only one of 30 is down.”

The company has available Iowa State University’s Ames campus wind tunnel to simulate harsh Atlantic coast weather conditions – complete with frost and snow. The Ames facility has previously partnered with NASA.

But Splitrock is first constructing an onshore version of its tower somewhere in Iowa this summer.

“We are projecting our costs of energy of our onshore turbine at 1.7 cents per kilowatt hour VS normal land based wind turbines at nearly 3.5 cents or more so our financial model shows we are lower than the price of coal or natural gas generation also,” Friesth wrote in a follow-up e-mail.

The design can scale up to 30 MW, according to Friesth. The company is talking to states on the U.S. coast about working together, he said.

“There will be a sighting issue to get the [offshore] prototype out there… We have the business model worked out. It’s not just a prototype – we’re working out the pricing details.”

The wait may not be too long. Last week, the Department of Interior announced a program to streamline the permit process for offshore wind farms.

Splitrock's TX prototype.

Splitrock's TX prototype.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

David Worthington

About David Worthington

David Worthington is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

David Worthington

David Worthington

Contributing Editor, Energy

David Worthington has written for BetaNews, eWeek, PC World, Technologizer and ZDNet. Formerly, he was a senior editor at SD Times. He holds a degree from Temple University. He is based in New York.

Follow him on Twitter.

David Worthington

David Worthington

David does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers. Occasionally he consults for other companies; should David cover a topic in which a client is involved, he will disclose this fact in his writing. His views do not represent those of ScaleOut Software.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Interesting design with limitations on application.
This might work great in Arizona, but I doubt it could hold up to ice and snow.

The first heavy wet snow I see this thing clogging. De-icing measures would eat into power output and make it virtually useless in a storm.
Posted by Hates Idiots
30th Nov 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Building a better windmill through design
The system was designed with built in deicing using system recycled waste heat so you don't waste energy generation also the surface is resistant to snow buildup as the systems was initially designed to handle Iowa weather.
Posted by kfriesth
30th Nov 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Building a better windmill through design
Appears to be an interesting concept. Would it be workable on a body of water that ices over, such as Lake Sakakawea in North Dakota?
Posted by mfladeland
30th Nov 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Building a better windmill through design
would this work inside of a smoke stack which might provide
constant pressure differential air flow even with zero wind?
Posted by jiohdi@...
30th Nov 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Building a better windmill through design
It might "work" inside of a smoke stack, but would require a redesigning of the stack, because it would take energy out of the exhaust stream.

Stacks are designed to use the lifting force of the hot exhaust to lift it out, and to leave enough lifting force to elevate the exhaust far enough into the air to satisfy pollution codes, which require that the smoke particulates not be present over certain concentrations within a certain distance of the stack. They must reach enough altitude that they will dilute before coming back down.

Besides, the dirtying from the exhaust and the difficulty in cleaning the turbine would likely mean that it would be a one-trail experiment.
Posted by Lightning Joe
1st Dec 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!