Follow this blog:
RSS

BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers

By | October 8, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

Just two days after the first big solar projects to be built on federal land obtained final approvals, the Bureau of Land Management gives the go ahead for yet another huge solar project in southern California.

BrightSource Energy is now set to begin construction on a 392-megawatt solar thermal plant they hope to finish by mid-2012. The Ivanpah Solar Electric System could potentially power 140,000 homes and offset around 400,000 tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually.

The other two projects are Tessera Solar’s concentrating solar dishes or “suncatchers” in Imperial Valley and Chevron Energy’s photovoltaic panels in Lucerne Valley. BrightSource’s Ivanpah System will involve three power towers and many, many flat, angled mirrors.

Over 3,500 acres, tens of thousands of mirrors will reflect sunlight toward receivers on the towers, where the concentrated solar energy will heat water to temperatures topping 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit. The steam powers a turbine, generating electricity. Because water in the Mojave Desert is hard to come by, the project will use a closed-loop, air-cooling system that reverts the steam back into water. Ivanpah will require only 100 acre feet of water each year, which is 95 percent less than other solar thermal technologies that employ wet-cooling, according to BrightSource.

In February, the project received $1.37 billion in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy.

While getting the final nods to put these projects on federal lands is great news for the solar industry, might it be too much at once regarding transmission?

The New York Times reports:

But even with federal approval, a major hurdle remains for most of the projects: finding excess capacity on transmission lines in the desert, most of which are fully booked or nearly so. At the moment, capacity exists for about 345 megawatts of the 754 megawatts that would eventually be generated by the two newly approved projects.

The rest would require a new line, like San Diego Gas & Electric’s 123-mile proposed Sunrise Powerlink, which has been approved but faces challenges in federal and state courts.

Related on SmartPlanet:

Image: BrightSource Energy
Via: CNET

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers
How many coal fired or natural gas generating facilities could be built for the same money and how much additional capacity could they bring online?

Could coal fired and natural gas plants be located in areas that have sufficient transmission capcity infrastructure already in place?
Posted by Repeal
8th Oct 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers
Coal? Me thinks one in PA is comparing their apples to
CA oranges.
Posted by zeprider1
8th Oct 2010
+2 Votes
+ -
RE: BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers
when you add all of the hidden costs (the costs of mitigating health
or environmental issues resulting from emmissions from coal or
carbon dioxide from natural gas) that are not being addressed in
your energy bills (but being passed on to the taxpayer in medical
costs and cleanup) i think solar power would be VERY competitive.
Posted by thom01
8th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers
Unless there is a major climate change, the fuel source for the solar power stations will not diminish. After the initial installation of the plants, fewer workers will be needed. No one needs to dig the sunlight and transfer it to the power station.
Posted by bhartmann
8th Oct 2010
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: BrightSource Energy gets federal approval for its solar power towers
BrightSource Energy signs contracts with Siemens for solar steam turbine generators


----------------------------------
http://www.alesum.com
Posted by musela
12th Oct 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!