Follow this blog:
RSS

Bionic cargo ships: riding waves to better fuel efficiency?

By | May 6, 2010, 4:00 AM PDT

When it comes to sea travel, the ocean has a lot of drag. The heavier and bigger the boat, the more propulsion energy lost to friction between the vessel’s hull and sea.

No surprise, the container ships issuing about 90 percent of global trade from port to port are huge fuel guzzlers.

Researchers at the University of Bonn, however, are hoping a plant can show these ships the way to a slicker surface. They have discovered how the water fern (salvinia molesta) repels water so superbly that it never really gets wet. When placed underwater, this plant’s tiny hair-like structures create “a gauzy skirt of air” that separates the fern from the surrounding liquid.

Synthetic surfaces that are super-hydrophobic already exist, but their ability to repel water is relatively short-lived within water that is moving. According to researchers, those materials could only maintain their air pockets for a matter of hours.

The water fern is different.

In their study published in Advanced Materials, the authors found that the very tips of the fern’s whiskers are actually hydrophilic, meaning they attract water. As the hair ends dive into water, they essentially pin the liquid away from the rest of the plant at regular intervals. The layer of air is then trapped.

Professor Thomas Schimmel of the University of Karlsruhe says in a statement:

After the solving of the self-cleansing of the lotus leaf twenty years ago, the discovery of the salvinia effect is one of the most important new discoveries in bionics.

The shipping industry emitted 847 million tons of carbon dioxide in 2007. The amount was almost 3 percent of human-made CO2 emissions that year, according to the International Maritime Organization.

The study suggests a water-fern-like coating on the hull of a container ship could decrease its fuel consumption by 10 percent.

Other uses for the fern’s hydrophobic qualities could be low-friction, quick-drying swimsuits (take note, Michael Phelps).

Images: Flickr/Andrew Albertson, Nanowerk



Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Melissa Mahony

About Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2010 to 2011.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Contributing Editor

Melissa Mahony has written for Scientific American Mind, Audubon Magazine, Plenty Magazine and LiveScience. Formerly, she was an editor at Wildlife Conservation magazine. She holds degrees from Boston College and New York University's Science, Health, and Environmental Reporting Program. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Melissa Mahony

Melissa Mahony

Melissa does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers. She currently works for the Wildlife Conservation Society as an editor. Should Melissa cover a topic in which the WCS is involved, she will disclose this fact in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bionic cargo ships: riding waves to better fuel efficiency?
Those Deutschlanders are some pretty bright guys. Sometimes the solution is too simple to be believed.
Posted by LostValley@...
7th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bionic cargo ships: riding waves to better fuel efficiency?
It's an interesting idea, but they'd have to include air bubblers:

the nanostructure that's holding the air bubbles will release
them eventually, and the whole point will be moot unless those
air bubbles are replaced.

The good news is that air bubble systems are already being
studied, for example, to prevent water next to a ship from
freezing up in arctic waters.
Posted by Jkirk3279
8th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bionic cargo ships: riding waves to better fuel efficiency?
I appreciate the revelation of another solution by nature however why always keep linking the potential of CO2 as the necessary validity of any new discovery? If this is a information site of scientific discourse then do not mention such an unscientific notion. CO2 reduction is not the reason that we should employ new technology or validate the use of one technology over another.

First of CO2 DOES NOT lead to global warning. Second it does feed plants, that is why we exhale it (in simplistic terms), man follows plant life not the other way around. If you want to see a reduction in the yearly use of a cargos ships use of ?fossil? fuels do not buy product made in foreign countries of such great distance. That is do not buy products made in China and you can very easily and quickly do your part to address your concern however for most U.S. nationals, saving that dollar is just too tempting, after all Wal-Mart isn?t the largest retailer without reason.

Why not just say there is a discovery from nature which can be used for various applications one of which is to make a moving object in water more efficient with the same use of force or perhaps this application could be applied to product design such that industrial designers may achieve a very stringent NEMA or IP rating without the current sealing efforts.

I apologize when I say this however it?s time to grow up and remove the vale from your eyes!
Posted by mario@...
10th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
Would This Create an Ecosystem Problem as an Invasive?
Transporting various flora and fauna out of their indigenous ecosystem niche has created many problems when introduced to other areas. I hope this has been considered and tested before allowing an impact to occur that is created when this fern unintentionally coats other surfaces without any inherent controls to prevent it from spreading.
Posted by donnydo77@...
17th May 2010
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bionic cargo ships: riding waves to better fuel efficiency?
@mario
For someone with such poor spelling and critical reasoning
skills, you are not really in a position to be calling global
warming unscientific. There is a reason that all but 100% of
specialists IN THE FIELD consider it settled. Please provide a list
of CLIMATOLOGISTS who disagree. Your list will NOT be very
long. Also, as the studies that support it followed the scientific
method, and the claims of those who doubt it do not, including
yours, calling it unscientific is particularly choice.
Posted by DeusExMachina
25th May 2010
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!