Follow this blog:
RSS

Ba-bye to six more U.S. coal plants

By | January 27, 2012, 11:51 AM PST

The Environmental Protection Agency’s new stricter mercury and air toxics rules are making it too expensive for owners of aging coal-fired power plants. This week, FirstEnergy joined a handful of U.S. utilities to decide to close six of its coal-fired power plants rather than install the anti-pollution equipment required to meet the new rules. American Electric Power and Duke Energy also have announced closures of some coal-fired plants.

The six coal plants, located in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Maryland, will be closed by September. These plants, which had a total capacity of 2,689 megawatts, were typically used to meet peak or intermediate power demand. The closing plants generated about 10 percent of the utility’s electricity. FirstEnergy has opted to invest in the necessary anti-pollution equipment and upgrades to its remaining coal-fired power plants.

The stricter rules, which were finalized in December, will reduce emissions of mercury, heavy metals and air toxins — which is a good thing. The new rules could end up reducing emissions even further, as utilities weigh the economics of investing in older, dirtier plants.

Still, the closures will inflict some pain. FirstEnergy’s decision affects 529 workers, who will be eligible for severance benefits. Not all of these workers will lose jobs. About one-third of the workers are eligible for retirement. The utility has about 100 job openings in its fossil fuel division, the Akron Beacon Journal reported.

Photo: Craig station in Colorado (not one of the plants slated for closure) Flickr user iagoarchangel, CC 2.0

Related:

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Kirsten Korosec

About Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Contributing Editor

Kirsten Korosec has written for Technology Review, Marketing News, The Hill, BNET and Bloomberg News. She holds a degree from Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism. She is based in Tucson, Arizona.

Follow her on Twitter.

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten Korosec

Kirsten does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Finally, some progress...
Asthmatics and others with health problems in the nearby areas can finally see the light at the end of the tunnel where they can breathe easier. It may cause a bit of problematic times with the loss of the power generation capacity, but maybe that will push the issue of installing more renewable energy sources rather than these filthy, non-renewable fossil fuel burners. In any event, this is a fantastic step forward.
Posted by SkyWlf77@...
28th Jan 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Sad part of the equation.
These 6 US plants are cleaner burning than any one of the dozens of coal power plants that will go online in India and China during 2012.

Yet the global warming scare mongers are more concerned about carbon emissions from these US plants than the tons of real toxic gases being pumped from unscrubbed plants in India and China.
Posted by Hates Idiots
31st Jan 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!