Follow this blog:
RSS

Debunking ‘auras’ and other magic in Spain

By | May 17, 2012, 3:21 AM PDT

GRANADA–In a country where psychic hotlines dominate public airways at nighttime, university psychologists have begun to prove the ability to read auras is simply an added biological trait.

Emilio Gomez is the supervisor for Oscar Iborra’s doctoral thesis, regarding special infrequent types of “synesthesia,” which in ancient Greek is “together” and “sensation.” Essentially, it is how one sensory or cognitive pathway involuntarily affects another pathway.

“We have explored overall person-color synesthesia, in different populations, artists overall. Then we thought that it was similar to the esoteric aura and then decided to explore the relationships,” Gomez says. Artists, persons of religion, and mind readers and the like each have been historically-perceived as depicting the auras of others, which can be a a colored radiation of light surrounding their patients and customers. “The phantom experience is not always a color, it can be also a temperature or a number,” Gomez clarifies. The colors are often then interpreted, ending in the giving of medical, emotional and spiritual advice or even alleged healing.

“About the extra-sensory psychic powers like reading auras, we think that (emotional) synesthesia can explain the origin of the beliefs in auras–person-color synesthesia–and (healing by) hand, mirror-touch synesthesia,” Gomez says. Essentially, the University’s research attempts to prove that there may be some reality to what healers and readers are perceiving, but that there is a logical neurological basis behind it, not some sort of higher power.

Gomez admits that this is just a theory, and they still have a lot of work to do. “Our main idea is that person-color synesthesia is very heterogeneous and related to very different parts of the brain. Sometimes the connection is between color zone and emotional brain, but others between motor brain and color zone, or between memory areas and color zone,” he says.

“I do not know about other countries, but in the south of Spain a lot of people believe in an esoteric world, reading hands, (healing) by hands, bad eye, different (visions) and so on. It is not difficult to find in small villages people with these ‘powers’,” Gomez says with air-quotes.

Gomez teaches at the University of Granada, near one one of Spain’s most famous holy figures “Santo” Esteban de Baza. In 1983, Esteban claims–after falling from a cliff and losing consciousness–to have seen the Virgin Mary, who then bestowed him with healing powers, at the age of 11. Since then, about 40 people a day come to him for healing of all sorts, especially eye ailments. Esteban is one of many fortune tellers and healers alleged to be in the areas of Baza and Gaudix, which economically benefit from incoming tourists and worshipers.

Apparently, certain jobs, like priests and painters, are more likely to have the neuropsychological phenomenon of synesthesia. The research saw a higher likelihood of synesthesia in artists and persons of religious, but Gomez says it is not a sufficient condition unto itself.

“You need also other personality traits. To be a religious person of this kind, a holy man, your frame of beliefs must be related to schizotypal (personality) or similar,” which is a type of social anxiety disorder. “About the artists, if your brain is more interconnected and it offers to you more emotional intelligence or different points of view, more cognitive flexibility and so on, then this type of mind is congruent with the artistic way of life.”

Gomez explains that he doesn’t believe this extra neuropsychological trait is necessary in order to be a successful artist or person of religion, but that it helps. “You can be a good non-synesthete artist and vice versa. We do not know if to be a synesthete makes you a good or a bad artist. In the same sense, I think that to be synesthete make you a better (holy man) or religious person. I mean, your powers can be not real, but you are more emotional and convincing,” Gomez says. “Not all people of religion have it. Only the frequency is higher than in general population, but probably” even higher in artists, he further explains.

If you don’t have this natural trait, you can still acquire it. “Yes, there is always the option of associative learning, but the learned synesthesia is poorer, less emotional, different,” Gomez says.

He doesn’t think their research is finished, as the brain contains infinite mysteries that he and his students will continue to try to unlock. He assures that his goal is scientific, not to disprove anyone, but to prove science.

“I mean for me it is not a question of all or nothing,” Gomez says, assuring that he isn’t aiming to disprove all healers as crock. “In the same sense that probably there are not super heroes like Superman, but you can find real heroes.”

To read the actual paper, go to Gomez’s student’s thesis. This research is based on Chapter 9, starting on page 157.

Photo of Esteban: La Casa del Arcoiris

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Jennifer Riggins

About Jennifer Riggins

Jennifer Riggins is a Barcelona correspondent for SmartPlanet.

Jennifer Riggins

Jennifer Riggins

Correspondent, Barcelona

Jennifer Riggins has held a number of positions in journalism, community organizing, non-profit fundraising, sales, and teaching English as a foreign language. She holds a degree from William Paterson University. She is based in Spain.

Follow her on Twitter.

Jennifer Riggins

Jennifer Riggins

Jennifer Riggins does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Debunking magic...
Wow, how original..."Gomez admits that this is just a theory." No kidding, they've been trying unsuccessfully to disprove this forever.
Posted by LenzE
17th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The Phenomenon of Bunk
I see this "explanation" for psychic phenomena again and again.
Why is it that evidence of certain conditions of the brain, making these so-called "powers" just a matter of nature, automatically discredit them? Doesn't it strengthen the validity of these phenomena to know they are natural conditions of the brain?
Why also are they always automatically associated with belief in a higher power? Who says that one must believe in some god or other in order to see auras?
It is not very scientific to call something "bunk" if your conclusions contain pre-conceived ideas as premises, or if you walk into a research laboratory (a small village perhaps) believing already that the people you are about to study are somehow delusional. In fact, the word "bunk" and all such "definitions" have no place in science whatsoever, along with the fallacy of argument by association, demonstrated here using the word "magic".
All phenomena are valid until they are proven not to exist. This research has not even approached this point, but in fact manages to do the opposite by pointing out real brain activity associated with the phenomena.
The phenomenon of "scientists" drawing rash conclusions based on their own irrational beliefs is illustrated perfectly in the title of this article; it has no bearing on the research, which leads to no such conclusion.
Posted by zefrose
Updated - 17th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
What?
I must confess, I didn't understand what the researcher was talking about at all - but then perhaps mysticism should be mysterious.
Posted by dford@...
17th May 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!