Follow this blog:
RSS

Wood buildings reach new heights

By | March 20, 2012, 5:27 AM PDT

If environmentally-minded architects have their way, more mid and high rise buildings will be constructed with wood instead of concrete and steel. An article in CNN’s Eco Solutions coverage asks, Can wooden skyscrapers transform concrete jungles?

Architect Michael Green is designing a 30 story building constructed with wood in Vancouver and advocates for more tall wood buildings:

“We think we can go higher than 30 stories,” says Green. “We stopped exploring wood around 100 years ago (with the advent of steel and concrete); now we’re looking at a whole new system using mass timber products.” Green says that the modern wood materials have been around for around 20 years, but until recently they’ve been quite niche or used only in low-rise buildings. What has changed is the way in which architects and builders are thinking about using wood. “The real change came when we started thinking about climate change. Steel and concrete are great but not environmentally friendly,” he says.

The modern wood materials that Green mentions are laminated strand lumber (a composite of wood strands glued together) and cross-laminated timber (layers of wood fused together at right angles to each other). Since the newly developed materials use wood fibers, they eliminate the need for cutting down large trees. Sourcing wood from sustainably managed forests also creates a more environmentally sensitive process.

As for concerns of fire risk, large timbers are naturally fire-resistant and perform better in fire than structural steel. Timbers form an insulating and fireproof layer of char that also protects the structural integrity.

Of course, as Green points out, any building material has to be cost effective to catch on in a big way. His firm’s research and designs of tall wood structures (pdf here) are offered for public use via a Creative Commons license.

Can wooden skyscrapers transform concrete jungles? [CNN]

Image: Michael Green Architects

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Sun Joo Kim

About Sun Joo Kim

Sun Joo Kim was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2012.

Sun Joo Kim

Sun Joo Kim

Contributing Editor

Sun Joo Kim is an architect and creative consultant based in Boston. Her projects include design and master planning of museums, public institutions, hospitals, and university buildings across the U.S. She holds a degree from Carnegie Mellon University and is a member of the U.S. Green Building Council.

Follow her on Twitter.

Sun Joo Kim

Sun Joo Kim

Sun Joo is an independent architectural designer who contracts with design firms. She does not hold any investments in the companies she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Cool design.
The current unofficial record holder is a house in Russia at 13 stories. It is not very pretty.

http://sightbywalk.blogspot.com/2010/08/worlds-tallest-wooden-skyscraper-1.html

The tallest wooden structure ever built was the Muhlacker antenna built in Germany in 1933 was 190 meters tall. (623 feet)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmitter_M%C3%BChlacker
Posted by Hates Idiots
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
wood buildiings
I can hardly wait. Just think what a fire will do to these gigantic chimneys!!
Posted by pauc1
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
chimney
It's called fire doors/firewalls my friend. Current fire code addresses this each floor is separated.
Posted by irishman_7@...
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
What about earthquakes?
How resistant to earthquakes are these wood buildings? Modern high-rises in earthquake country have to be able to "give" without toppling over.
Posted by zackers
20th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
earthquake
Properly designed modern wood buildings are much more forgiving (flexible) than either steel or concrete.
Posted by irishman_7@...
20th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Environmentally minded ??
Some things I see in this article just do not make sense. Perhaps the article is too short or assumes one has read extensively about these "environmental" issues.

First WHY is steel and concrete unacceptable to an environmentalist? Both can be recycled - the steel can be remelted and reformed, the concrete crushed and used as filler or base material (as presently done in several concrete pads, driveways, roads...

It is mentioned that "large timbers are naturally fire-resistant" and "Timbers form an insulating and fireproof layer of char" however there is NOTHING natural about these wooden processed products that are intended for this construction use, they are stated to be "a composite of wood strands glued together" or "layers of wood fused together" (I can only assume that some type of binder is still needed). Since these are not natural timbers would not the glue itself be flammable and negate the char effect?

Finally the energy cost to manufacture these 'new' timbers. Are they more efficient overall or does the process of stripping the wood to fibers then reforming them add to environmental concerns such as energy usage and use of chemical treatments during the processing??

Looking forward to further discussion to 'clear' the air... so to speak wink
Posted by marinechief@...
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
a little more
Apologies, there is a fair amount of material on the carbon impacts of steel and concrete on SmartPlanet, so I did assume readers had read previous posts. (If you haven't, I highly recommend it).
The evironmental friendliness of wood vs. steel vs. concrete is an ongoing debate, since they each consume energy to source, produce, and manufacture. All the materials have their own advocates (who have their own agendas).
As for the manufactured wood products not acting like "natural" timbers, even composite wood will act like large timbers because of mass and size. The binders used are non-flammable.
Posted by SunJoo
20th Mar 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
a bit more than a little.
The Tall Wood design relies on steel and concrete. Obviously not as much as a traditional high rise, but the floors use concrete topping - 2"+ - and a steel wide flange along the perimeter and back to the core.

The charring rate was calculated at 0.65mm / min, or 78mm total depth (3 inches) after 2 hours without intervention. Much of the detailing shows traditional gypsum wallboard sheathing, so it's not all that different from protecting steel structural elements, to overcome the reduction of structural strength of timber, resulting from fire.

I can think of many ways that the proposed savings / sf would be diminished, if not entirely used up:

1. Cost of familiarity of construction. Unless this style of construction caught on, everyone from Architect, Engineer to Contractor will find it difficult to design and build without stumbling along the way and incurring high revision costs / delays.
2. IBC and complete test documentation. Without revisions to the IBC, in the US the difficulty will be providing the necessary information and proof of the system, to building code officials. Without complete test documentation from UL and a series of unified means of construction / materials from ASTM and others, the argument from the code official will be: You're asking me to trust you?
3. Software. BIM would require a dedicated Tall Wood library. Someone needs to get the ball rolling on this, if complex high rises are ever to catch on.

These aren't insurmountable obstacles, but they will need to be addressed fully, and that will take some time.
Posted by gork platter
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
This takes 'Towering Infreno' to new heights!
Can you imagine being in one of these things burning from the bottom up?! One would hopefully be using 'engineered wood' where flammability had been either 'engineered out' or greatly reduced, otherwise structure like this would be a good candidate for Towering Inferno II or III or ???
Posted by josephhyde@...
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
That's in there
Fire resistance is touched on in the 2nd to last paragraph. These aren't big pieces of natural wood, they're wood fibers & sheets glued together. Fire retardant chemicals would be added at the same time as, or just before, the glue. I thought wood was limited to 3 story buildings. There's no mention, though, of how this compares to steel frame construction or reinforced concrete frame construction in cost.
Posted by hoodedswan
20th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Termites?
What about termites or other vermin?
Posted by bhami@...
23rd Mar 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!