Follow this blog:
RSS

Re-imagining New York’s East River waterfront

By | October 28, 2011, 7:05 PM PDT

Last month, a non-profit organization called for a design competition to rethink New York City’s East River waterfront, an area of Manhattan that has fallen into disrepair.

The ideas contest is looking for innovative designs from architects, landscape architects, urban planners, designers and students to submit ideas that “generate dramatic and original concepts for the east side’s waterfront park, jump starting a process that aspires to the transformation of the entire East River pedestrian experience,” reads the Reimagining the Waterfront’s website.

CIVITAS, the group behind the contest, is a nonprofit that works to update and improve land use on the Upper East Side and East Harlem in Manhattan. It has offered $5,000 for first place, $3,000 for second place, and $2,000 for third place, with $100 to each of five honorable mentions.

The ideas contest is a way of mobilizing the the neighborhood as well as the political and design communities while support and funding is allocated.

“Through the design-ideas competition,” said the group, “we hope to establish greater equality with other New York City waterfront parks by developing a spatially rich and varied scheme that will enhance the east river waterfront’s narrow confines with recognition of its total urban context.”

The area in question spreads from 60th to 125th streets, and in some places is even sinking into the water.

“Waterfronts are transitional boundaries between New York City’s hard and soft edges, between life on land and life on water,” writes Sharon Pope on Metropolis Magazine’s blog.

Pope also notes that NYC Councilmember Jessica Lappin has already secured money for the worst areas as well as an engineering study, both good first steps toward the realization of the new project.

Reimagining the Waterfront is only the beginning. The competition closes on January 15, 2012. Following the selection of winners is sure to be a campaign to raise money to make the East Side into a new green space for the city.

[Via Metropolis]
Photo: Bogdan Migulski/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Beth Carter

About Beth Carter

Beth Carter is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Beth Carter

Beth Carter

Contributing Editor

Beth Carter is a freelance journalist based in New York City. She has worked for Catalyst magazine, the New York Times Syndicate, BBC Travel and Wired. She holds degrees from the University of Oregon and New York University.

Follow her on Twitter.

Beth Carter

Beth Carter

Beth does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers in her writing.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
Solutions are shaped by inputs.
"innovative designs from architects, landscape architects, urban planners, designers and students "

-The solution response is going to look like the limitations of the skills of those soliciting the response and the limitations of the groups that supply the responses. I note that a more intelligent approach might also include economist, mass balance analyst and engineers. Designers and architects are generally mistakenly understood as stand alone fields, but both require (in some cases legally require) the practical review and support of those who understand structure, waste elimination, and cost/benefit.
Posted by dduggerbiocepts
31st Oct 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
But not Dominated by Inputs
In the world of modernism then Mr DD you would be correct, but the hard lessons learnt from Modernism are that 'we are not machines'. Humans require more than just function otherwise why have the Arts?
Concept then function. The limits of Art are only in the imagination of the designer. As some who builds as well as designs i understand your reservations, but i have learnt over the years that its about the end user and their response to a space. So do you want a utilitarian design (i have seen many in the former Eastern Block countries and they are soulless) or design that caters for peoples sense of place.
So yes designers create problems, but the beauty of problems is the satisfaction of solving them ('problem' literal translation from Greek, so i am told is 'push forward').
The touch paper has been lit.....
Posted by felixfatfunk
2nd Nov 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!