Follow this blog:
RSS

National Mall to have less grass, more bikes

By | March 5, 2012, 6:10 AM PST

As we reported back in October, the National Mall is getting primed for a face lift, by way of a design competition. One of the questions that these competing designers must address is: How can the Mall area safely accommodate more people, especially during massive gatherings and rallies? And how can they do this without degrading its beauty?

One thing is obvious: more grass is not the answer. Though the Mall is known as “America’s Front Lawn,” its grassy turf can’t take the the constant pounding of visitors’ feet. With that in mind, the National Park Service, which operates the Mall, is removing three lawn areas in the Mall between 3rd and 7th Streets, Northwest and has proposed removing two more sections of lawn, near the Smithsonian Metro station, with gravel. It also hopes to widen walkways along the Mall.

Not only does the foot traffic on the Mall kill the grass, it degrades the turf’s drainage, so the Park Service will remove the topsoil, add a drainage layer and re-grade the surface. The new gravel walkways will come in handy, since the National Capital Planning Commission (NCPC) late last week approved preliminary and final site development plans to install the first five Capital Bikeshare stations on the National Mall.

The bikeshare stations will be placed at key destinations throughout the Mall, including at the Smithsonian Metro station, the Lincoln Memorial, the Jefferson Memorial and the Washington Monument.

The bikeshare program is a joint effort between the District of Columbia and Arlington County, Virginia, and the fleet has grown to more than 1,200 bikes and 130 bike stations since it launched in 2010 — in fact, the program has been so successful that it may expand to the DC suburbs.

Bikeshare programs have launched in most major U.S. cities within the past few years, and they’re proving popular among commuters and tourists alike. It seems likely that tourists would make up most riders on the National Mall. With the added mobility that bikes provide, tourist will be able to see more of the attractions along the Mall during a single visit.

As we’ve seen in bikeshare programs around the world, the bikeshare bikes are becoming increasingly tech- and design-focused. How long before the National Park Service begins to see the potential for including guided tours or erecting interpretive trails along the Mall as part of the bikeshare program? These could make it easier for tourists to learn about the Memorials as they roll past them.

Image: Flickr/scott*eric

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

About Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Contributing Editor

Mary Catherine O'Connor has written for Fast Company, Wired, Outside, Entrepreneur, Earth2Tech, Earth Island Journal and The Bold Italic. She is based in San Francisco.

Follow her on Twitter.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine has written white papers and marketing material for technology companies and will not write about companies with which is actively engaged. She will disclose any instances in which her work mentions companies for which she has worked. Mary Catherine does not hold any investments in the companies that she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Dumb idea.
At a time when urban areas need more green spaces they want to pave paradise and put up a parking lot.
Posted by Hates Idiots
5th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
You misunderstand.
Gravel is pervious, thus allowing drainage, and making it very different from a parking lot with impervious asphaltic concrete paving. It still allows the treatment of water - via natural filtration in the soil - even if it does not produce oxygen as plants would.
Posted by gork platter
5th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
You are uninformed as to the real situation.
The turf damage found at the Mall has more to do with poor maintenance than poor design or over use. The mall has been fine for decades of continuous use. So why is there a problem now?

While the bureaucrats in the Department of the Interior have averaged 20% pay raises under the Obama administration the maintenance funds for our National Parks, to include the Mall, has been cut every year under Obama.

This information is straight from employees of the National Park Service.

The mentality at work in this design is similar to the urban renewal movement of the 1960s and 1970s that saw vast thriving urban neighborhoods destroyed to make way for urban highways that 40 years later are being torn down in favor of old school designs.

Cars or bikes, it makes no matter, history repeats itself until people learn from it.
Posted by Hates Idiots
5th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Your history seems faulty.
The movement you speak of, was mostly concentrated post-WWII, under Robert Moses and his push for Modernism, which peaked in the late 50s.

The counter-movement in urban planning, starting in the early 60s with Jane Jacobs' seminal book, "The Death and Life of Great American Cities", does not seem to offer any sort of lesson in terms of urban planning of the National Mall, since this counter-movement dealt with community-accessible amenities.

Aside from that, upkeep costs are important, and grass is not necessarily the answer. As a matter of fact, green lawns with its rye grass, require much more water and labor than the natural plants and landscaping it replaced.

I apologize ahead of time, if you, like myself, took landscape architecture, urban planning and economics classes (aside from major) in college, as it's not my intention to talk down to you.
Posted by gork platter
5th Mar 2012
0 Votes
+ -
We were late to the movement.
No offence taken. I often miss the correct times because of the local situation.

The urban redevelopment movement hit it's peak in my hometown in the late 1960s and early 1970s when over 10,000 people were evicted from the Little Italy neighborhood. Over 1/10th the population in a city of just 80,000. The plan for skyscrapers and a major urban throughway never happened.

The area looked like WW II Dresden with hollowed out half demolished houses for over 30 years until 2002 when they finally made a river side park with most of the land, with a 40 unit low income housing development at one end and a 20 unit development at the other end.

The city population currently sits around 74,000.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 5th Mar 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!