Follow this blog:
RSS

Do kaleidoscope trashcans merely obfuscate the real problem?

By | February 22, 2012, 6:00 AM PST

There’s litter, and then there’s littering that is so pervasive that it becomes part of the landscape. There are parts of India (and plenty of other parts of the world) where this is true. To address the problem of litter and attempt to break the habits of litter-happy Mumbai residents, designers Nishant Jethi and Aalap Deasi created a trashcan lined with mirrors. When one places an item into the can, he or she sees the colorful design inside shift.

“Cleanliness Creates Beauty” says the sign above the trashcan. Indeed, its mirrors turn empty bottles and wrappers into some compelling patterns. But can this change the habits of people who’d otherwise get up from a bench and leave their lunch wrappings behind? According to the pilot test that Jethi and Deasi performed, it might. The “Cleanoscope” they installed near a playground collected 288 pounds in a week, while only 180 pounds is collected in average cans.

That still leaves a number of questions, such as how large are the other cans? How often are they emptied? One isn’t going to put trash in a can that can’t hold any more trash. The video above notes that lack of cleanliness contributes significantly to illness in India, but that likely has much more to do with lack of clean water and good hygiene than it does to litter in the streets. Plus, how scalable is the Cleanoscope solution?

But the bigger question this all leaves me asking is: why not address the waste generation and lifecycle rather than making garbage look pretty for a time?

From the Cleanoscope, garbage goes to a dump, where rag-pickers will sort it and remove all items of value. There’s value in this process, to be certain, and as this 2009 Economist article notes, rag-pickers are likely better at recycling than a large municipal recycling system, such as the one in San Francisco. But at the same time, it’s dangerous work. Rag-pickers also form an industry that would be more productive if waste was better handled at the point of generation. I’m not suggesting a major overall, with curbside recycling. But even just removing organic waste from the waste stream — and deriving value from that it through composting — could greatly improve the way waste is managed in India.

It’s dated (from 2007) but this news story from an Indian news outlet claims that the city produced 6,000 tons of garbage each day, and that a bit more than half of that could be turned into compost. An NGO was busy training rag-pickers on how they could divert and compost organic waste from their trash, and it was working with a housing authority to develop a means of utilizing the compost. The goal was not only to teach the women a new skill, but to provide them with a secondary revenue stream.

While the Cleanoscope is a novel idea, and while it’s hard to question any attempts to stem littering, a more systemic approach to addressing waste and its lifecycle could have a much larger impact.

Via: The Atlantic

Related:

Image: Flickr / Matthew L Stevens

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

About Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Contributing Editor

Mary Catherine O'Connor has written for Fast Company, Wired, Outside, Entrepreneur, Earth2Tech, Earth Island Journal and The Bold Italic. She is based in San Francisco.

Follow her on Twitter.

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine O'Connor

Mary Catherine has written white papers and marketing material for technology companies and will not write about companies with which is actively engaged. She will disclose any instances in which her work mentions companies for which she has worked. Mary Catherine does not hold any investments in the companies that she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
8
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Solves the problem it was intended to
The phrase "obfuscate the real problem" implies that there is 1 problem and they've incorrectly identified it. No, they correctly identified and designed a solution to the problem of littering in public places. The 'systematic' issues the article talks about are also real problems, but they are .different. problems. The author may think they are well intentioned by bringing up these larger issues, but to do so in this way needlessly insults these innovative designers. Hint: acknowledge they've done well with this littering issue, then maybe suggest they move on and try to address the larger issues.
Posted by dfelix@...
22nd Feb 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
A few questions
How long will those mirrors stay clean? Are they unbreakable? Will somebody want to steal them? How much does such a can cost? Should there be more cans together, one of each for different kind of garbage?

We sort our garbage into seven different groups:
energy = burnable garbage like packages, plastics, cloth,
glass = bottles, windows(no capital letter), jars
metal = aluminum, steel, pots and pans, cans,
organic = food, plants, flowers,
paper = newspaper, cartons, magazines, books,
toxic material = paint, medicines, oil,
and stuff that can't be reused or circulated, like porceline.

Interesting idea, and will make people take notice.
Posted by Dukhalion
22nd Feb 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Value of people
I find that people who throw trash with no regard to what happens to it after they are through with it are usually people who feel entitled and they usually are from cultures where the people are divided into classes that separate from those that perform menial labor and those who believe it's beneath them to perform menial labor. These individuals believe that "there's a person to take care of their messes" and therefore they don't need to be concerned about it. This usually happens when it is extremely cheap to hire people to perform these tasks for you. In some cultures, it's cheaper to hire someone to preform certain tasks than it is for you to do them yourself, and therefore, even though you haven't paid for someone to directly pick up your trash (or flush your toilet, or sweep your walk) you are of the belief that "there's someone for that". I see it at work where people leave dishes in the communal kitchen with the belief that the dishes will magically clean themselves and place themselves back on the communal dish shelf...And I notice that the people who do this are obviously from cultures where the value of people is inherently lower than most civilized cultures...
Posted by tech_ed@...
22nd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
no.
I've seen people from all levels and cultures pollute.
Its both a matter of the individuals personality, how they were raised, and the
level of inconvenience to perform the action.

Someone who has a trash can next to them is more likely to use it than
someone who needs to walk a bit to do so. The communal kitchen shows
the problem inherent with shared environments. All it takes is one or two
people to cause the system to collapse because they are not doing
their share. At first others take up the slack, but eventually you end up
with people refusing to deal with other people's messes even though it
impacts on their own lives.
Posted by richard233
23rd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The Chicken or the Egg?
In your article you advocate for a better back end solution to India's garbage problem but this is a solution for a problem of it's front end. You can't sort trash that's never collected.

Other that the designer's blog post (http://nishant1269.blogspot.com/2012/02/blog-post.html) and the youtube video linked in the article there seems to be no information on it. Gleaning from the info the trash cans where the same size as the others and at the end of the week the Cleanoscope was full and the others weren't. The trash cans weren't emptied in that week.

While attempting to source this article, I found that litter is a massive problem in India. The Mumbai Mirror newspaper and The City of Mumbai (BMC) started a "Fight the Filth" campaign this summer. Here are a few example articles.

About the campaign: http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article§id=15&contentid=2011062720110627034312351c3398486

Mid way progress report: http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article§id=2&contentid=2011070920110709033710834d0d8257

Campaign wrap up: http://www.mumbaimirror.com/index.aspx?page=article§id=15&contentid=2011090520110905084608210681bd962

These clean ups were organized by the Rotaract (Rotarty) Club of Mumbai Shivaji Park and the creators of this trash can belong to this club.

I think this is an interesting story fit for Smartplanet and I would like you to interview these designers.
Posted by shaunehunter
23rd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Dubious references.
In the Economist article cited, was a case study of three recycling centres in different parts of the world, Mumbai, San Francisco and London. The (anonymous?) author's hypothesis on the efficiency of Mumbai's "Rag Pickers" who live in abject poverty is based solely on her own opinion.

In Mumbai, a charity is paying 100 Rupees per day ($2) to sort valuables and recyclables from trash of a few apartment buildings.

In SF, a company pays their employees $20/hr and charges residents $25 per mounth to sort their trash and ship recyclables to China. They separate out an estimated 70% of SF's garbage to be recycled.

In London, a company uses an automated process to sort garbage with a high "resolution" to enable them to recycle garbage locally and turns a profit.

IBN's article had no citations on where their figures on waste came from.
Posted by shaunehunter
Updated - 23rd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Don't let a high school English teacher see this article
The last incoherent sentence by itself would warrant at least a -2. Refuse, even metaphorically, is not a life form and does not grow or develop, unlike the fictional Marjory the Trash Heap on the children's television program, "Fraggle Rock." It accumulates and decays.
Posted by meniskos@...
23rd Feb 2012
0 Votes
+ -
I've fixed the final sentence
Thanks for bringing the error to my attention.
Posted by MCOC
26th Feb 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!