Follow this blog:
RSS

A design concept to solve the challenges of transporting wind turbines

By | July 26, 2011, 8:56 PM PDT

Manufacturers of wind turbines and their components are challenged with figuring out how to transport the gigantic structures efficiently. Turbine blades can reach up to 260 feet in length, translating into large, heavy, and expensive cargo loads. Parts must be carried on a variety of trucks, trains, and ships from factories to installation sites. So the act of transporting wind turbines presents necessary situations that aren’t quite eco-friendly, in terms of carbon footprints. But an ambitious conceptual project by two young Danish designers, Mads Thomsen and Rune Kirt, is winning awards and gaining attention for its elegant, sustainable, although theoretical solution to the wind-turbine-transportation problem. Their proposal? Use dirigibles powered by solar energy.

The duo has designed the plans for a sleek airship that has the smooth, delicate curves of a river stone, but which can be engineered to carry up to 1,000 tons of wind turbine parts. After conducting ongoing interviews with pilots, engineers, and cargo loading managers, as well as research into the practices of dirigible producers and operators, among other sources, they came up with the following design strategy for their airship:

  • The form of the airship should look non-threatening, yet professional, as it is a new concept for wind-turbine transportation
  • The aerodynamic hull should have a flat underbelly that opens toward the ground to allow wind turbine parts to be lifted easily into the cargo area
  • The structure should be flexible to accommodate different large turbine components

Here’s a video of how the designers envision how their airship would look and work, along with some additional background on Thomsen and Kirt’s research:

Most recently, Thomsen and Kirt received an inaugural Core77 Design Award last week, given by the respected design-world Web site Core77, in the category of Specultive Objects/Concepts. The judges in this category included such luminaries as Branko Lukic, author and founder of Nonobject Design & Innovation Studio, and Banny Banerjee, founder of Stanford University’s Design for Change Lab. The jury collectively issued a statement about Thomsen and Kirt’s idea, in which they likened the concept to a “new paradigm” and said that the proposal “was highly visionary, spoke to a very real issue, and demonstrated brilliant execution.”

The concept, which Thomsen and Kirt call the Knarr Cargo Airship, is also currently a finalist for the 2011 Index Awards, an honor given by Index, a Danish non-profit that recognizes international design created to improve the lives of people around the globe. Winners will be announced in early September. In 2009, Thomsen and Kirt won the Danish Design Centre’s Special Prize during Copenhagen Design Week for the Knarr Cargo Airship, chosen by a jury that included internationally renowned designers Ross Lovegrove and Jens Martin Skibsted.

Although the Knarr Cargo Airship is far from becoming a reality any time soon, as a concept it is clearly causing many of the world’s top thinkers in the field of design to pay attention to not only Thomsen and Kirt’s work, but also the challenges that wind turbine manufacturers face and how designers could possibly help solve them.

Photo: Project Knarr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Reena Jana

About Reena Jana

Reena Jana was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2013.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Contributing Editor

Reena Jana has written for the New York Times, Wired, Harvard Business Review online, Fast Company, Architectural Record, Artforum, Time Out New York, Harper's Bazaar, and GQ. Previously, she was the innovation department editor at BusinessWeek. She holds degrees from Columbia University and Barnard College.

Follow her on Twitter.

Reena Jana

Reena Jana

Reena occasionally consults with companies, and when her writing discusses a corporation or other organization with which she has worked, she will disclose this fact. Reena does not hold any investments in the companies she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Very timely post.
I was just watching a show about a wind farm being built in the middle US and how transporting the components was a huge problem.

The project was a year behind schedule as millions were spent improving dirt county roads and raising local bridges to be able to handle the massive 100-ton loads needed to get the towers, turbines and blades in place.

I???ll bet they could build such a blimp for less than they paid for all that work on just that 1 project.
Posted by Hates Idiots
27th Jul 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Future of all transport
This could very well be the beginning of a huge surge to replace large fossil fuel guzzling ships and trains and some current air transporters. We could see these things crossing continents transporting many goods, carrying containers and more. Very much looking forward to major developments in this field.
Posted by CommanderWinslow
27th Jul 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
Hope they thought of this...
I like the idea of using this airship system to move the large cumbersom wind turbine parts. But... the very location this blip will need to deliver goods to will be in the windyest places. I guess they can wait for a calm morning to offload at the job site. Drop a big anchor and hold on...
Posted by frank.thies@...
27th Jul 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
We did think of this
Hi Frank, we did think of this. In fact it shouldn't be a problem according to airship developers around the world. We were told be some of them that an airship like this would be able to operate in same weather conditions as a helicopter.

As normally the airship would land on the ground for on-/offloading. It is much safer and easier to control. Our type of airship is a hybrid, simular to the British Hybird Air Vehicles http://hybridairvehicles.com/ or a bit like American Lockheed Martin http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wUkCyXCqUx8&feature=related
So it is heavier and more controllable than a blimp or zeppeliner and therefore it wouldn't need a mooring mast.

Should it be to windy to land you would actually be able to stall against the wind direction and unload/load.

Today installation cranes at wind farms have the same challenge with the wind. And they manage to cordinate according to the wind conditions wink
Posted by Rune Kirt
1st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Thank you very much
Well done! Thank you very much for professional templates and community edition
sesli chat sesli sohbet
Posted by yarinsiz
Updated - 26th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!