Follow this blog:
RSS

Will driverless podcars transform the Silicon Valley office park?

By | May 14, 2012, 3:30 AM PDT

For all the innovation that goes on in Silicon Valley, the urban design of their office parks is stuck in the past.

80s era office parks house the likes of Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn, and Intuit in the North Bayshore area of Mountain View, California. The North Bayshore district is located 2 miles outside the Mountain View downtown with “blocks of attractive but low-slung, auto-oriented office buildings, just a little too far away from one another for walking,” according to William Fulton at Governing Magazine.

While the campus of Google has a nice walkable feel, see the photo above, the area surrounding the campus looks like this:

But as Google and other tech companies look to expand in the region, Fulton points out that the area is looking to solutions to the increased congestion of thousands more workers commuting to the office park. Google already runs one of the country’s largest corporate-operated shuttles. It moves 3,500 workers daily throughout the Bay Area. But it does little to connect Google with downtown Mountain View, which could bring more economic activity to the area and, because downtown is connected to light rail, make it easier for people to take transit to work.

One idea to improve transit and decrease congestion is personal rapid transit (PRT). It’s an elevated rail line where individual pod cars, that hold a handful of people and run on electricity, take riders straight to their desired destination without making other stops. The systems have been put in place at West Virginia University and Heathrow Airport (see photo below). But will PRT bring innovation to the office park design or is there a much more obvious solution?

For the system to be a worthwhile investment it would have to carry 6,000-8,000 people during peak hours, according to Fulton.

But it’s not the only option. In the land of innovation, could old-school city-building be the answer? Here’s Fulton:

While PRT is sexy, the other options are deceptively boring and low-tech. The first one is simply to charge for parking, rather standard for most urban areas around the world but, so far, a foreign idea in North Bayshore. The second is to reduce the need for commuting by building housing and office space in North Bayshore. That way, employees can walk or ride their bikes to work or at least limit their travel on the PRT to a stop or two.

Whether the city goes with personal rapid transit or creates a live-work village, it’s clear that the office park design is in desperate need of change. Even the former city manager, Bruce Liedstrand, who helped bring about the North Bayshore area sees the failure in its design: it assumes that car-dependency would never change, according to the Mountain View Voice.

Mountain View is in the process of developing a master plan for its future development, which it expects to release soon. Ideas are also being gathered from the public on how to move forward with development in North Bayshore.

Photos: Via Flickr users (from top to bottom) Kevin Krejci, gholzer, and garybembridge

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
2
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
but it'll all be under water so what's the point
The elevation of north bayshore is all of about 6 feet and it's all landfill. Before the end of the century that will be reclaimed by rising bay waters. Why would you build residences there?
Posted by schaefda
18th May 2012
0 Votes
+ -
because
No one knows for sure. You cannot predict what will happen in 90 years. No one alive and working today will be alive then and concerned about it. There are ways of keeping the sea out--New Orleans is below sea level. Yes they were innundated by a hurricane recently, but that was due to a lot of human error on all parts. When was the last hurricane to hit mid-California? In 90 years there may be other reasons not to worry about it as well, all the comapnies may have moved or be out of businees by then. The world may have ended by then, and no one will be here to care one way or another.
If people wanted to live in Mountain View where they are suggesting, there would be a demand for housing.
Work out the transportaion issues and go on. I don't quite see the difference between pods and trains except for size of vehicle.
What would charging for parking do? Raise money for the parking lot owner, cause a few poeple to look into carpooling. It is not going to solve the problem. If mass transit is the idea, why not electric busses or CNG busses, they would be better than Diesel busses. One wouldn't have to build a new rail system or buy new pods that would require 6-8k people daily riding it to make it cost effective.
Posted by dhays
18th May 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!