Follow this blog:
RSS

Which countries deliver the most educational opportunity?

By | September 16, 2012, 6:05 AM PDT

In the midst of the Chicago teacher’s strike, the subject of educational opportunity is rarely far from the imagination.

“The most important civil rights battleground today is education,” New York Times columnist Nicholas D. Kristof wrote Sept. 12, “and, likewise, the most crucial struggle against poverty is the one fought in schools.”

But what, exactly, does educational opportunity mean? Last week, the OECD released a study investigating just that. “Education at a Glance 2012″ examines potential indicators affecting student performance including per-pupil spending, public and private investment, teacher pay, and tuition costs.

But do metrics per-pupil spending directly translate to dramatic gains in educational opportunity? Not necessarily, according to the OECD study. If it did, the list of nations that provide the most upward mobility might include big spending nations like Luxembourg ($19,324.09 per pupil), Switzerland ($15,644.94 per pupil), Norway ($13,882.88 per pupil), Austria ($12,588.60 per pupil), and the United States ($12,550.24 per pupil).

Instead, the nations with students most likely to exceed their parents when it comes to educational achievement include:

  1. Poland
  2. Portugal
  3. Turkey
  4. Ireland
  5. Hungary
  6. Czech Republic
  7. Greece
  8. Italy
  9. Spain
  10. Slovak Republic

What can educational organizations learn from these data? Simply put, that qualitative factors such as poverty, democracy, and open economies matter — sometimes more than dollars and cents.

Flickr: James Sarmiento/Flickr, BES Photos/Flickr

[The Guardian]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Claire Lambrecht

About Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht

Contributing Editor

Claire Lambrecht is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. She has written for the New York Times, Slate, Salon, Guernica and CBS MoneyWatch. Previously, she served as a Fulbright ETA and Teach For America corps member. She holds degrees from Cornell University and the University of Hawaii and is pursuing another from New York University.

Follow her on Twitter.

Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht

Claire does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
The conclusions are not supported by the data, as presented
For starters, you have to divide the amount spent per child by the gross national product (or the average annual income, or something of that sort). This would take into account the cost of living in that country. It's just like in the USA. You can't take states where the cost of living is high, like New York, and directly compare how much they spend per pupil to states where the cost of living is low, like Wyoming. (And the same goes for counties, to some degree.)
Posted by dmm99
20th Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!