Follow this blog:
RSS

Video: How ‘augmented reality’ will make boring cities beautiful

By | August 10, 2011, 12:52 PM PDT

In the near future, as you stroll down the street, billboards and street signs will change to suit your interests. Ghostly arrows will float in the air, pointing you toward your destination. Buildings, vehicles, the apparel of those you pass, and the very fabric of the reality you perceive will all be as changeable as your wardrobe.

That’s the vision of futurists and science fiction authors like Vernor Vinge, and increasingly, it’s the reality brought to us by ever-more-powerful mobile devices. Some day soon, when our cell phones are connected to display systems compact enough to project images on the inside of eyeglasses, the boundaries between the digital and the real world will simply dissolve.

September 26, technologists will gather in Munich, Germany to demonstrate the progress they’ve made toward this vision at the annual insideAR augmented reality conference.

In this video, the folks at augmented reality software company Metaio are showing off what’s possible with the world’s fastest mobile phones. It takes incredible processing power to both recognize the position of a viewer relative to an urban scene and simultaneously overlay it with an arbitrary set of polygons, but that’s exactly what the graphics processing units in the new Tegra-2 powered Android phones can do.

But the technology is less important than its implications. Junaio’s goal is to “make the digital world surrounding us a natural experience,” which means “not just showing some type of information on top of a camera image, but truly embedding the digital information into the real world as a natural experience. That means it has to be accurately aligned to the real world.”

Previously, optical tracking for augmented reality applications was limited to two-dimensional objects. But with better hardware, true augmented reality has begun to emerge. All-visual processing of scenes allows for a more-perfect alignment of the “augmented” reality with the real reality than any other technology — localization via GPS and related technologies just can’t cut it, and the accelerometers meant to tell phones their current orientation in space are primitive at best. As Metaio’s spokesman notes:

“Now, since the real world is three dimensional — it’s not always a magazine or a movie poster — we are moving to 3D optical tracking. Which means that we can take any kind of 3D object. It can be curved, but it can be also, like a city, very complex, and use that as a reference for optical tracking.”

Once augmented reality is widespread, the difference between a great and a mediocre city won’t just be its built environment. To some extent, it will also be the degree to which that environment is a suitable tapestry for the creatives who will paint it with their augmented reality brush. Digital artists who learn to re-appropriate the city with the most innovative augmented reality add-ons won’t just bring themselves fame and fortune — they’ll also be attracting others to the places they love.

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christopher Mims

About Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2012.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Contributing Editor

Christopher Mims has written for Scientific American, WIRED, Popular Science, Fast Company, Good, Discover, Slate, Technology Review, Nature and the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. Formerly, he was an editor at Scientific American, Grist and Seed. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow him on Twitter.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Christopher does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
14
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+2 Votes
+ -
Really cool, I guess...
...but doesn't it seem like just another step towards "The Matrix"?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
11th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Yep
...except for the parts about everyone lying motionless in tanks being used as a power source. They really weren't very good movies but pay attention.
Posted by hoodedswan
11th Aug 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
Well, "The Matrix" never made sense in a thermodynamics way...
...but the idea of keeping people sedate and pliant has always been the goal of governments. I can see how convincing people that they live in a pretty environment synthetically instead of really would certainly have appeal to "planners".
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 12th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
"the planners"
brilliant emphasis ... Stanislaw Lem does it again, only now, it _is_ The Future.
Posted by Maxey Lynch
16th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
This will sell
especially if the displays also function as sunglasses. Augmented reality is already the new standard for jet fighter & helicopter gunship aircrews, and is in prototype stage for infantry.
Posted by hoodedswan
11th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
to gun without killing
... ah! that is the question! no gorging blood to deal with ... except of course, when it becomes the banana peel and the fruit flies move in for theirs ...
Posted by Maxey Lynch
16th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
AR for armies
Yep, just helps killing people look more and more like a video game. Pity there is no spare life for the victims (mosthy civilians)...
Posted by maximejacquet@...
18th Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Augmented reality?
Well, ok. While the assumed crowds sink further and further into the couch exploring and enjoying their virtual world, I'll be out exploring the real one.
Enhancements as tools sounds interesting. Enhancements to further entertain and/ or distract a society that already suffers from collective ADD really needs to stop.
Posted by shokd
16th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
What about "garbage in"?
Sure there can be a place for augmented reality . . . like the military, maybe diving, and other jobs where it helps to augment safety. However, everyday, for everybody, anywhere via glasses, sunglasses . . . there would be an excessive amount of "garbage in". For example think Facebook games (like the wildly popular Farmville) and how they want to do your thinking for you by trying to second guess and/or dictate your routine at the game site via excessive pop-ups that actually interfere with and delay what you are trying to accomplish i.e. garbage in. If there was some way to do GIS type layering so people have a choice about what is incoming . . . well, then it could be useful IF totally configurable by users - rather than dictatorial about directing attention. Not only would it be dictatorial by default but it would only become worse if not 100% configurable from the start of such technology going viral. Like t.v. and other forms of technology that direct one's thinking, with overuse AR would also be likely to have the capability of creating ADD, even autism in people who don't have those conditions. I guess my concern is that it might be widely available and go viral before the issue of preventing abuse has been dealt with, thus my question becomes: in what ways can AR be abused? Lets protect people from the abuse of AR before it is "let loose" and before, as has happened with so much technology previously (like nuclear power), the damages are only recognized in retrospect rather than before the fact.
Posted by mgossage@...
Updated - 16th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
...
This is never going to happen in such a magor way. These apps will be used to provide us with extra information about certain objects we're viewing such as seen in the famous Layar app. They are not going to change the way we see the world.
Posted by wompai
Updated - 16th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Useful AR...
I have had in mind a positive, useful and creative application for AR for a few years now...
Imagine visiting a historic site of a ruined castle, whipping out your mobile device (or borrowing one as you do now with those 'Audio Tour' handheld devices).
Visiting the castles web page or scanning a QR code takes you to the AR page where moving your device around shows the castle as it would (might) have been - even with historical characters wondering around. The AR picks up on the ruins geometry (or markers if there are not many features/walls left!) and superimposes the projected 3D images on top.
By clicking on 'hot spots' in the AR scene the existing audio or new video talk takes place within a window in the AR scene. You could even follow characters and click on them to interact! Perhaps with permission, YOU yourself could become a historical figure of your choice that OTHERS using the AR app would see (just for fun!). The app could track the ID of the mobile device and use that as the marker for your character.
I see SO many possibilities for this type of AR.
Historians can SEE in their mind what something may have looked like based on their knowledge, some artists paint 2D paintings so that visitors can see from ONE viewpoint what the ruin may have looked like, TV programs (TimeTeam (UK)) use 3D to show viewers at home what they think would have been built on ground works they have unearthed. BUT imagine being able to see the whole collection of this data overlayed in an AR app that allows you to see ALL the angles and information as detailed as YOU want it to be, as you move around the site - looking through your Virtual Window To The Past! Using a tablet with a 10" screen would be awsome - a great size window!
Now wouldn't that really would be something?
Posted by jamesirvine@...
17th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Boring cities, did you say?
Typical of the myopia of blind tech-heads in the heading of this story. It's not the boredom, but rather the visual decay and urban blight ( think of the cheery delights of the recent London riots), that such devices will have to "augment."
How the dickens is anyone going to cook up software/devices which would mask the stench, the blight, the pollution, the social/economic decay, the violence of the ever burgeoning "ghettoizing" of the post modern, multi-3rd-world-cultural cesspits which are our metropolitan homes??
Optimistically yours
Posted by paulwforsyth@...
17th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
how convenient
The city can be left to decay, potholes abound, buildings fall into ruin, and the debate will be over public spending on an app. What flavor of artificial town should we project to residents and visitors? Should the two be the same?

One day the legal definition of "Chicago" or "San Francisco" is going to be the app, the template of what the artificial "city" will be.

Well, maybe not as imaginative as casting everyone as sedated batteries, but this is going to create more weirdness than it will helpful information. I'd put money on gamers taking this over and directing future development of this technology.
Posted by catseverywhere@...
17th Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
I don't do boring
If I substitue 'uninteresting' for 'boring' then a boring city might be one I don't understand, or a section of a city that I don't understand, and therefore find uninteresting. 'Augmented reality' would definitely be a cure for that. I can't imagine (and my imagination is at least average) a truely uninteresting city if I were able to understand it. Cities have so much to offer.
To speak to earlier comments, the "sinking further into the couch" doesn't seem to apply, as you would need to be out in the city in question to have it 'augmented'. For a different reason, the glossy overlay of decay seems off the mark as well. The reality is still there, and still visible, potholes and all. Perhaps crowd-sourcing could get them filled more quickly.
Another optimist, I guess.
Posted by JimWillette
29th Aug 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!