Follow this blog:
RSS

Video: Greenest building in world uses no water or electricity

By | August 31, 2011, 8:17 AM PDT

About the only thing the Cascadia Center for Sustainable Design won’t do is grow food for its inhabitants. Six stories, 50,000 square feet, and it won’t use a single watt of electricity from the grid, nor a drop of water from the ample supply in downtown Seattle, where it’s sited.

How is this even possible? All of the building’s power will come from solar panels studding its roof and façade. But that’s not nearly enough to power a conventional building, which is where the designers of the Cascadia Center get really clever.

The building will be ultra-insulated, of course, but its remaining heating and cooling needs will be addressed by a geothermal system that pipes water into the ground, and uses that water either to power an air conditioner or to warm air before it’s heated. It’s called a ground-source heat pump.

The building will also get 100 percent of the water it uses from collected rainwater, stored and filtered on-site.

Finally, individuals offices in the building will be given energy caps. If they need more energy than their cap allows, they can trade with their neighbors for it. In other words, a classic cap-and-trade scheme, but for energy instead of greenhouse gas emissions. This will incentivize individual tenants to save energy, for instance by investing in energy-efficient appliances, computers and lighting.

The Cascadia Center isn’t just a one-off project. It’s part of a larger effort called the Living Building design challenge, which makes LEED look unambitious by comparison:

To be certified as a Living Building, a structure is required to be self-sufficient for energy and water for at least 12 continuous months and to meet rigorous standards for green materials and for the quality of its indoor environment.

To be certified as a Living Building, a structure must meet all of the following requirements.

  1. Site: The location will support a pedestrian-, bicycle-, and transit-friendly lifestyle.
  2. Water: Rainwater will be collected on the roof, stored in an underground cistern and used throughout the building.
  3. Energy: A solar array will generate as much electricity as the building uses.
  4. Health: The building will promote health for its occupants, with inviting stairways, operable windows and features to promote walking and resource sharing.
  5. Materials: The building will not contain any “Red List” hazardous materials, including PVC, cadmium, lead, mercury and hormone-mimicking substances, all of which are commonly found in building components.
  6. Equity: Unlike many office buildings, large operable windows will offer fresh air and daylight to all the people who work in the Cacscadia Center. The goals of Seattle’s Community High Road Agreement will guide selection of the construction team.
  7. Beauty: Stunning architecture, an innovative photovoltaic array, a green roof and other native plantings, large structural timbers and a revitalized neighboring pocket park will help beautify the surrounding streetscape.

Not every climate will accommodate a Living Building. It’s hard to imagine any structure in drought-prone Texas, for example, being water self-sufficient. Which raises the question: In a future of dwindling resources, where self sufficiency and Living Buildings are the primary sources of wealth, are there certain climates in which we simply can’t afford to build?

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Christopher Mims

About Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims was a contributing editor for SmartPlanet from 2011 to 2012.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Contributing Editor

Christopher Mims has written for Scientific American, WIRED, Popular Science, Fast Company, Good, Discover, Slate, Technology Review, Nature and the Nicholas Institute for Environmental Policy Solutions at Duke University. Formerly, he was an editor at Scientific American, Grist and Seed. He is based in Washington, D.C.

Follow him on Twitter.

Christopher Mims

Christopher Mims

Christopher does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
26
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
2012 follow up?
Cant wait for the follow up story on this building.
Posted by zachary2001
31st Aug 2011
0 Votes
+ -
WA State and Rain water
I had previously read that WA state outlawed the collection of rain water. This was done out of fear that if everyone collected rainwater their rivers, lakes and streams would dry up. Did they get a waiver or was I miss-informed.
If everyone did collect rain water would the environment be harmed?
Posted by kenmullins1
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Rain Water Harvesting
Althought this building will harvest rain water, it will not likely harvest every rain drop that hits it's roof, even with a huge cistern, there will still be excess rain. Also, the cistern will actually conserve water becasue you have less loss to evaporation. Now, if EVERY building had a huge cistern, what would that do to the water cycle, good question.
Posted by The Mottola Group
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Rain Water for use
The collection of rain water for use doesn't remove it from the ecosystem. Its just changing the source of storage from a water reservoir to a cistern underground. In the end the water will end up back into the environment the same way as all water we use. Its lot like the water is being horded and stored underground hostage from everyone else.

Many cities run the rain water into sewer drains to be treated somehow because of what it picks up from our streets, sidewalks and yards. Leaving much to not desire in the water returned to nature. So I think it may also reduce the impact on our water treatment facilities.

It would be nice to see living buildings go even one step further as to treat their waste water themselves as well.
Posted by Britewood
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
It is not yet banned in Washington state.
But this ruling from 2009 says the state reserves the right to ban collecting water from your own roof.

http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wr/hq/rwh.html

In 2010 they did put some restrictions in place, but it is not "per se" banned.

http://www.wastormwatercenter.org/blog/thread/25
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 1st Sep 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Simply wonderful!
Why not build homes with many of these same ideas? Our 110 year old home we live in now has cisterns we used into the 90's (but some leaking of our 3 cement tanks made us go to well water only) and I'd love using more solar for electrical needs or whatever else might work well. Our only problem is the units are so expensive up front, we'd have to live a lifetime just to break even on the investment. Great idea that I'm proud of these guys for making a reality.
Posted by bobinmo1
31st Aug 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
cisterns
I lived in two places in Wis. where the homes had cisterns that collected rain water from their roofs. I thought this was great except when I had to go down in the basement and using a fish net, retrieve the dead rats!
Posted by Jackson77
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Doesn't _everyone_ "live a lifetime" ? :^D
bobinmo1, doesn't _everyone_ "live a lifetime" ? :^D

Good points otherwise, though. I've been experimenting with low-cost lighting fixtures using regular LED's (not the expensive, high-power, high-efficiency ones) and regular solar recharging systems as are found in solar "path lights" (about ten of them, total investment about USD 15 including the NiCd batteries) and the "portable" solar panels designed for 12V automotive battery recharging, which can be bought for around USD 100 including the charge regulator and the 12V-to-110V inverter for running small 110V appliances. The path-lights can light a small area indoors all evening adequately for conversation, or even reading if the lights are all directed at the book. The 12V system can deliver quite a lot of power for a couple hours, which may be suitable for many different evening activities.

IHTH

Jim in MN
Posted by Jim-Bob_z
Updated - 31st Aug 2011
+3 Votes
+ -
Waste water
One thing I didn't see mentioned is what they do the building's waste water/sewage. Does it tie into the City's sewer system or do they have some novel way to recycle it back into the water supply?
Posted by Dark Force
Updated - 31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Honest question.
I am not trying to be a wise guy, but...

How good is that solar setup going to work in a city that has over 220 days a year that qualify as CLOUDY? Sunny being defined as less than 30% clouds.

40 days in a row of cloud cover with no sun is an all too common event in Seattle to depend on solar panels. The most recent happening was spring of 2011.
Posted by Hates Idiots
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
sun
I lived in VA and was told, do not even bother with solar, not enough sun, and there is a whole lot more sun in VA.
Posted by pervleft
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Cloudy
Solar power still works when it's cloudy, the output is just lower. I can't imagine they haven't taken the cloudy days into account in their design. From the language in the certification list I imagine they are still eligible for certification as long at they produce more power than they use even if they use power from the grid at times.
Posted by riverat1
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Don't be so sure they planned for it.
When hanging the lights in the $13 billion Big Dig tunnels in Boston they never accounted for road salt.

3 have already fallen with rotted brackets. Every light in the tunnels has to be replaced at a cost of more than $100 million.
Posted by Hates Idiots
1st Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Cool
...excuse the pun. Most of the power in an office building goes toward the HVAC. Heat in a highly insulated building can be supplied, to an extent, by it's human & mechanical occupants. The geothermal cooling is real impressive as described & could be emulated on a large scale if there was a way to finance it. The problem with energy efficient buildings has been that cost savings are long term but investors base their decisions on much shorter (5-10 year) periods of ownership.
Posted by hoodedswan
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
COST
COST?
WHAT IS THE MANUFACTURING CARBON FOOTPRINT.
The footprint for the prius is "almost" as bad as the hummer.
Posted by pervleft
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
waste less, need less
Conserve and avoid waste and you'll be surprised how little energy it takes to run a building. LumenCache would be ideal for this type of building.
Posted by distinctav
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Green buildings
How about extending the compatibility with nature idea to the building's aesthetics, by using proportions that have been shown to exist in natural organisms? The Fibonacci series might be a good starting place to find the numbers to plug into such plans. Who knows what other advantages besides aesthetics could result from borrowing nature's modular construction themes?
Posted by Chris Sabin
31st Aug 2011
+2 Votes
+ -
Rainwater & Geothermal
Manned lighthouses used to collect rainwater to be used on the desolate rocks they sat on. But there were problems with this type of collection. Since it was collected, primarily from the rooftops via gutters and downpipes, it could be (and usually was) contaminated with fecal matter from seagulls. It usually also contained other marine life (mollusks, shellfish etc) that seagulls dropped on the roof to crack open. This method was abandoned in the early 70s.
I had a geothermal unit (water to water) installed in a new house I built about 10 years ago. A great system. I used it to heat my floors. I had about 3000' of black plastic utility pipe buried about 6' down, where the temperature is always 50 - 55 deg F.
Posted by 16Tons
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Offsets
If we build them everywhere we can, then it will definitely offset the cost of building normal buildings where the climate cannot support such buildings. Texas may not be able to have a self-sustaining building water-wise, but water can be piped to it and it can supply it's heating and electrical needs pretty well on it's own because of abundant solar and thermal energy in it's climate. So it may not be self-sufficient, but it CAN support greener buildings.
Posted by ZazieLavender
31st Aug 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
ADA approved?
I am all for self sufficient buildings and this one looks great. Especially in an area that is quite regulated, I am wondering if this building meets all ADA criteria. It must take a lot of energy to operate an elevator. Whild I am not actually handicapped, I could not do more then one level of stairs at a clip without having to rest for 1/2 an hour in between floors.
Posted by RoBoTeq
1st Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Unlikely mass exodus from zones that can't support a LB
In areas where water is the challenge, could a green building trade for outside water with another resource they have in abundance - all that sunlight in Texas, maybe a Texas green building could grow food!
Posted by rsanquiche
2nd Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Really
I have a 2 story Tree House in my yard that is Greener than this building is or ever will be.
Posted by man-rescue
4th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Green Roof?
Does the building incorporate a green roof or wall into its structure?
Posted by Esther80
6th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
The Green lie about solar PV
"it won???t use a single watt of electricity from the grid"

Then were are the batteries? What, there aren't any.

You need to choose your words more carefully to avoid repeating the Green lie about solar PV. The fact that this building can generate twice as much energy as it uses does not mean that the above statement is true. If it has no storage and it is connected to the grid then it does use electricity from the grid.

There is also the issue of applying Kant's first principle here. Clearly this would not work if everyone did it -- the electric grid is not a battery; it does not store energy.
Posted by JRT256
8th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Grid ingertie isn't a bad thing
The idea that every building needs to be completely self sufficient isn't as important as the overall energy consumption and waste produced. Grid-tied solar buildings that overproduce electricity during the daytime are ideal in that they are at maximum production during peak demand times. They reduce fossil fuel use from the Utility. At night the building draws a small amount from the grid.

We're doing this on a home in Indiana. Search LumenCache on facebook.
Posted by distinctav
8th Sep 2011
+1 Vote
+ -
Design and Concept effective in the Philippines
Such building concept and design will work effectively here in our country, the Philippines where the rainy and dry seasons are distinct in majority of the areas in the country. The country receives enough sunlight even on rainy season thereby making electricity available in such season. Even in the dry season, the country receives certain amounts of rain. The drier months always take shorter than the rainy months so scarcity of water during these months can be solved by providing larger cisterns for storing rain water to be used in the dry months.
Posted by Ella Jacildo
11th Sep 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!