Follow this blog:
RSS

U.S. invests $60 million in clean energy buses

By | September 17, 2012, 8:19 AM PDT

Getting around on mass transit is already the cleaner commuting option. Now the U.S. Department of Transportation wants to help transit agencies take it a step further.

The Federal Transit Administration is investing $59.3 million, through the Clean Fuels Grant Program, in 27 projects that reduce emissions from buses and improve fuel economy.

“President Obama is committed to investing in sustainable transportation systems that improve access to jobs, education and medical care for millions of riders, while bringing cleaner air to our communities and reducing our dependence on oil,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood in a statement. “These projects will also help transit agencies operate more efficiently, and save money in the long run.”

The grants will support transit agencies in switching from older diesel buses to hybrid-electric buses, compressed natural gas buses, or 100 percent electric buses. In addition to bus replacement, the funds will help cities build fueling stations for buses that use alternative fuels and purchase batteries for hybrid buses.

While 27 projects were funded, there were 146 projects seeking funds amounting to over $500 million in desired bus upgrades.

Investing in cleaner buses makes sense in light of the fact that transit ridership continues to rise in the United States. In 16 of the last 19 month transit ridership has increased. Last July alone transit ridership was up 2.5 percent over the past 12 month period.

At the same time, electric and hybrid bus purchases are also on the rise. In North America, hybrid models account for about 40 percent of new bus purchases, according to Pike Research. And from 2012 to 2018 the electric bus market is expected to grow by 26 percent.

See if your city is getting funds to upgrade its bus system.

Photo: Flickr/Atomic Taco

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
-1 Votes
+ -
Problems...
Here is the problem, what happens when the bus doesn't run where you need it to? Or the bus takes 3 times longer than driving? Or you have to work late and now the busses have stopped running for the night?

Public transit isn't the solution, we need cleaner running vehicles and more roads, which means less traffic and less wasted fuel.
Posted by cmwade1977
17th Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Working together
Maybe greener public transit can be a method that can work hand in hand with greener vehicle. Another way will be to adjust the route travelled by the public transit or increase the frequency of the service. This means more jobs created as well
Posted by Wilson Yeo
21st Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Fraud
I have to wonder how specific the wording on the funding is. You know if roads and traffic patterns are adjusted, it's possible to increase gas mileage. While I'm not a big fan of public transit, it's not a lot of money so let's hope the it's used as intended and in areas that would benefit the most. My area would not, and I see WI did not receive those funds - good.
Posted by Havokmon
21st Sep
0 Votes
+ -
Sustainable Transportation & Design Thinking
When it comes to Sustainable Transportation one has to bring in "design thinking" & "destructive thinking".
Design Thinking is fulfilling an "unmet need" and this has been used by marketing experts and they called it "niche market" giving people what they want.
Destructive Thinking is staff telling the boss what to do instead of the boss telling the staff what to do.
People want "personal transport", which means they want freedom of travel, they want their own space, they want to travel alone, they want to travel whenever they want, they want to choose their travel time, they do want to wait at bus stops or train platforms, they do not want to be dominated by time tables or schedules or routes, they want continuous travel, they hate it when the bus or train stops to drop or pick up passengers, they want to travel fast, they get repulsive feelings when certain types of people come & sit next to them, they do not want to share their space, they want door-step delivery and all this freedom they get from the personal car, now which they do not want to give up and so now have to pay higher fuel prices and have to waste time & fuel in traffic congestion and risk accidents.

"Design thinking" will mean giving the people "Personal Sustainable Transportation" which has all the advantage of a Personal Car and all the advantages of a Public Transport without the disadvantages of either.

"Destructive Thinking" will allow for new innovations to come up. The bus, the train, the car, are all inventions of the 20th century, and all these inventions depended on cheap fuel. Now cost & availablity of fuel and health hazards due the combustion of these fuel are critical issues. Also people need to travel more than before and more people are travelling than before and more people are having cars and more people are travelling longer and more parking spaces are needed, all of these will not be solved by fuel efficient buses.

A revolutionary idea is needed. Fuel efficient buses, metro trains, monorail are a short term solution. A quantum leap in technology is needed.

Most people when they talk of mass transit they think only in terms of buses or metro trains and they do not think in terms of PRT. Transit involving buses (BRTS) & trains are very expensive to set up & operate and they waste a lot of agricultural land and also use up a lot of energy. Once the transit is commissioned people complain about the high cost, high fares, poor frequency, overcrowding, bad choice of routes, multi modal transfers, time wasted, breakdowns, workers strikes, which we hear all the time and the operator complaining about poor ridership and demands subsidy (Sydney monorail).
Posted by ilajnaaneem
22nd Sep
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!