Follow this blog:
RSS

Trees turn deadly in New York City

By | June 27, 2012, 3:30 AM PDT

The only way to avoid death by tree is to have no trees at all.

This sounds like a futuristic adage, but according to Adrian Benepe, the New York City parks commissioner, there is only one way to assure the gooey rotten limbs of a great maple, oak, or elm never strike again.

“The only absolute correction would be to have no trees at all, which would mean a city with much dirtier air, hotter temperatures, polluted water, and desertlike streets and public places — in short a city that would be neither healthful nor livable,” said Mr. Benepe.

Removing the trees from New York City is not an option.  By pointing to this, Mr. Benepe is also saying the city cannot prevent all future deaths caused by trees. And this quandary is at the heart of the debate.

Who is responsible for these deaths?

William Glaberson and Lisa W. Foderaro of The New York Times ask, “How much responsibility does the city have for protecting people who pass beneath its graceful elms, oaks and maples? Lawyers for the injured and dead have argued for more, while lawyers for the city have argued for less; in at least two recent cases, the city’s position has been rejected by appeals courts.”

While the number of tree injuries is relatively small - 51 people between 2006 and 2011, including two deaths - evidence suggests that with proper city care the worst cases could have been avoided.

According to Glaberson and Foderaro, “The struggle will only get more challenging: New York City is more than halfway to its goal of planting a million more trees.”

Read about the most recent cases here.

Image: Flickr/Ella’s Dad

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Rachel James

About Rachel James

Rachel James is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Rachel James

Rachel James

Contributing Editor

Rachel James is a radio documentary producer and multimedia journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. She has worked with Radiolab and This American Life, contributed to WNYC's Talk To Me, Down East Magazine, KALW's Crosscurrents and the Third Coast International Audio Festival. She holds a degree from the University of Toronto and is a graduate of the radio program at the Salt Institute for Documentary Studies.

Follow her on Twitter.

Rachel James

Rachel James

Rachel does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
1
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
The age old questions of urban trees in US cities.
Why do I have to rake up the leaves? The city should.

When is the city going to take down that dead tree?

Most large cities have a contract with a tree service to prune/remove/replace damaged trees.

The weak link has been 2 fold. 1. Residents always assume it is someone elses problem to call city hall about or

2. Bureaucrats drop the ball when a call was made.

Chances are pretty good someone noticed the damaged or diseased limbs long before they fell and killed people, but no one called to report it.

Or a bureaucrat did not handle the call properly and failed to follow up and get the situation taken care of.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 28th Jun
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!