Follow this blog:
RSS

Top 10 U.S. cities for public transportation

By | February 10, 2011, 8:52 AM PST

Some cities, like New York City or Boston, you just know to forget the car and hop on public transportation.

U.S. News & World Report has come up with a list of the 10 best U.S. cities for public transportation, and there are some surprises — and notable omissions.

USN&WR’s editors don’t offer a lot of information about how they came up with it, except that it’s based on “data on ridership, safety, and government spending.”

No time frame, no sources, but nonetheless it’s fun to see what they came up with.

Here’s the list:

9. (tie) Austin — In sprawling Texas, Austin is the lone star of transportation. Boasting 3,000 bus stops along with light rail, its 140,000 rides per day is the highest ridership per capita in Texas.

9. (tie) Denver — The 2,348 square mile of bus and light rail lines provide service for 331,121 daily rides, and they’re expanding. The $6 billion FasTracks program will add 6 light rail diesel commuter rail and electric commuter rail lines, spanning 119 miles.

8. Honolulu — I would be parked at the beach. But fortunately, for those who want to get around the city, the bus’ 107 routes has an average daily ridership of 236,000. It has the 4th highest use of mass transit per capita in the nation.

7. Los Angeles — Forget traffic jams and smog, L.A. has the 3rd largest transportation system in the U.S. And it’s 9,200 employees, makes it one of the largest employers in the region. (Think about that, cities with limited transportation.)

6. San Francisco — Famous for its trolleys, the San Francisco Municipal Railway, operates 54 bus lines, 17 trolley buses, and 7 light rail lines. The Bay Area Rapid Transit connects San Francisco with Oakland and Berkeley and reaches up to 80 miles per hour. 

5. Minneapolis-St. Paul — It’s a bit of surprise to see Minneapolis this high up the list. But it does boast a light rail and bus lines, with a growing annual ridership. Plus, at the University of Minnesota the buses are free.

4. Boston — With bus, subway, commuter rail, and ferries, The T has a daily ridership of about 1.2 million. It also has the busiest light rail line in the U.S.

3. New York City — The subway is king in New York City. It’s the largest in the world. And with one of the most expansive transportation systems, more than half of all households do not own a car.

2. Salt Lake City — It’s a surprise to see Salt Lake City this high, and above New York City. But according to U.S. News & World Report, the city earned the spot “in large part because of its heavy investment in serving a large suburban and exurban population.” The city has extensive bus and light rail lines, including ski buses. And the Frontlines 2015 project will add five rail lines by 2015.

1. Portland — “Portland is widely considered one of the nation’s leaders in public transit,” the U.S. News & World Report list says. I’m not sure if they picked Portland based on instinct, but it’s a good choice. For its size Portland has a large number of options for public transportation. Plus, they have an aerial tram — not all that efficient, but seriously cool.

I was also surprised to see cities like Seattle — with its electric buses and expanding light rail — or Washington D.C. — with its 39 percent transit ridership — not make the list. Do you have other issues with the list? Think your city should be on it? Tell us why in the comments below.

Photo: TriMet/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
33
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Like you I'm surprised Seattle and DC did not make the list. I was also curious what 2,348 square mile of service in Denver means. I understand miles of rail or bus lines, but square miles? It is a great system that I use often.
Posted by JimWillette
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I was shocked that L.A. made the list. I hear it's making bus
service cutbacks, but adding more light rail. I was saddened that
New Orleans didn't make the list. When I was growing up there in
the 60s, the city buslines served the working class, kids and others
without cars. Katrina hit a city where the poor and the elderly didn't
have to own cars because they depended on the cheap and
available bus system.
Posted by stockard@...
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
LA makes the list, Chicago & DC don't? Sure makes me wonder what the USN&WR criteria were. I'm no expert but really?
Posted by hoodedswan
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Where is Chicago? Its hard to believe its not in the top ten.
Posted by d.j.elliott@...
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I'm surprised Boston didn't make the list, when I was there the MTA took me everywhere I wanted to go.

Maybe they give an undue weight to bus service? To me, at least, bus service is absolute last-choice transportation.

In my little city, to take the bus I have to wait, and wait, and then wait some more 'cause they only run once an hour at most and aren't very good at keeping a schedule. I can get in the car, drive across town, transact business and be on my way home most of the time before the bus gets there to start the trip. I can walk the mile or two to my mechanic's in less time than waiting on the bus. . .
Posted by CodeCurmudgeon
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Portland? Is that Maine or Oregon?
As for Washington DC not making the list? Hmmm, no surprise there...the public transit system in DC and it's surrounding suburbs is a mess! And unless you're going east or west, you can forget about any kind of decent public transportation! And let's not even get into the cost!
Posted by tech_ed@...
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Something about the name of the publication that put out this list: US News and WORLD Report made me expect a comparison across cities of the world. I suppose it is like the World Series.
Posted by paulminett
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Would love to see a similar comparison across the globe. Am sure London, Singapore and New York will be in the list. Within a couple of years, Dubai will catch up as well. Amsterdam is uniquely eco friendly in its public transportation.
Posted by jyotinmehta
10th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I've lived in rural areas my entire life, so my experience is limited to
visiting cities rather than using them daily. Even then, I'm not a
frequent traveler, so my experiences are somewhat limited.

From that perspective, the DART light-rail system in Dallas was the
easiest to use that I've come across. From the uncomplicated fee
schedule to the ease of getting on and off the trains, I was very
impressed.
Posted by kylehutson
11th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
With the title, I expected to see Tokyo, Curitiba, Moscow, etc. As I clicked the link I actually thought, "I wonder how many U.S. cities will make the list?"

The title should have been Top 10 U.S. cities...

I find it disappointing that we aren't talking more about some of the best public transport systems worldwide, and maybe trying to emulate some of their better features.
Posted by sheridans@...
11th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
@sheridans
You're absolutely right. The headline has been updated to be 100%
clear.

Thanks for your feedback.
Posted by andrew.nusca
11th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
NLA but no Chicago, come on! It not only handles the city but works great getting in and out of the burbs!
Posted by SDM1711
11th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Holy cow. I live in Austin and you guys are Nuckin futs.

Public transit here in Austin is pathetic. Light rail? huh? what?

We have a light rail line with so little ridership they don't run the trains!!

Sorry -- get a clue.
Posted by donlee@...
15th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Austin on the list?? "... highest ridership per capita in Texas ...".
LA is on the list?

Obviously not an objective list, more probably a list of cities who would fly the author (first class) to the city for an "onsite" report.
Posted by Latenitec1
15th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I love Puget Sound's (Seattle area) transit system, but it does face several big challenges that make greatness a very difficult goal to attain. The #1 challenge is the way the metro area (Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia) is wrapped around the sound. This sort of geography makes efficient mass transit very challenging. Additionally, there are parallel ridges of large hills running Norht/South through the entire area which also make easy movement from East to West very difficult. Combine the two, and it's not as simple to solve the usual transit issues as it would be if the metro area were essentially circular or square and located in a relatively flat area. All that said, the current combination of boats, trains and buses of every type really does make commuting much easier than it would otherwise be. I love it.
Posted by Trep Ford
15th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
LA? Is this a joke?
This is rigged
Posted by avsol@...
15th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Dallas should be on there . With bus and lite rail I went everywhere I needed to go. Very seldom used my car.
Posted by EKRULL8@...
15th Feb 2011
-1 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
LA? You have to be kidding. I took metrorail from San Bernardino
to Union Station in 1.5 hours. I then took the EXPRESS bus from
Union Station to LAX and experienced a nearly 3 hour trip. Most.
People living in LA realize you need a car. Also Minneapolis is
better than D.C. and Chicago? Please! You also left out Atlanta
which has a decent system. Its got to be better than no subway in
the twin cities in winter. I never undersood why the twin cities does
not have a ubway or light rail system. Your list reeks of kickback
and lacks credibility
Posted by ghlaw@...
15th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Please, how about a list of the worst, most expensive? Try Rock
Island County, MetroLINK, now called Metro. Yes, used to work
there, will contibute to the report. Look at their websites, almost
no riders do, see how many employees attend the Board of
Directors, free journalism.

Chicago is A+, others stated, freinds use it, will contribute.

Someone listened, updated the name, I am impressed.

Tea Party, this is where less government, less taxes start, except
in my area, oops. Hopefully the more progressive cities do, I
read about it in Denver, very impressive.
Posted by Paybacks are Heaven
16th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I can understand by a population numbers statistic that NYC is
#3. What is not covered in your story, is that the NYC subway
system is very old and deteriorating rapidly. What should be a 15
minute commute turns into 90 minutes. There are constant
delays, malfunctions. The city has laid off many transit workers.
On the weekends the delays are ridiculous, you could spend 5
hours getting to a destination that is only 2 stops in distance.
The bus system runs very slowly. NYC transit system is
expensive and delivers a poor service presently.
Posted by ElleRand
16th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Bottom 10 cities for public transportation
I get the impression that Tyler Falk's standards are inverted. The more
people who have private, independent vehicles the better it is; the more who
are consigned to being treated like collectivist cattle, the worse.
Posted by Professor8
16th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Without source information on how US News ended up with this particular list, it doesn't make any sense.

Chicago and Washington D.C. are strangely absent.

And what about Philadelphia?
Posted by Marykay
16th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
In the UK we don't have public transportation. We have public transport. Transportation is what happened to criminals many years ago when they were sent out to remote places such as Australia. What's the US term for this? wink

I'm astonished at Professor8's comment - does he really want the roads to be clogged with 1 person per vehicle, not forgetting the horrendous waste of resources that this implies?
Posted by JohnOfStony
17th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
As a lifelong citizen of Minneapolis, I was amazed that we even made the list. Light rail has been fought by conservatives for so long that it's amazing we have the two lines we do have(actually one is a train). Since my childhood the powers that be have been studying whther or not to introduce light rail (basically since they dismantled one of the best streetcar systems in the country so crooks could sell the Twin Cities GM buses). The amount of money they have spent on studies could have made this metro area a shining star in transit. At least we have skyways.
Posted by StrayBullett
17th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
I have lived in Chicago for 6 years - 3 of those without my own car. Even after I bought my first car I did not need it other than on weekends or going shopping. The best part was single fare system regardless of the distance traveled. If one needed to change from bus to train or in the reverse order the extra cost WAS a mere dime !

I am talking about a period 30 years ago ! I am pretty sure neither the old man Daley nor his son would have allowed it to deteriorate.
Posted by pmshah@...
18th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Posted by bhgnf
Updated - 22nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
US News did a terrible job
I live in the Denver metro area. US News cited Denver as one of the best cities, especially for its FasTracks program. What they didn't say was that to get FasTracks started it was deliberately and severely underfunded so that the initial sales tax hike could do the job for a couple decades at least. Major parts of the Denver metro region will not be served by FasTracks unless the sales tax is doubled. In the parts of FasTracks that are completed, I seldom see more than two or three people per car except during rush hour.

Denver does have a fair metro bus system, and they are trying to put in more express lanes with flexible pricing. But this system still does not meet what LA had when I lived there two decades ago.
Posted by zackers
21st Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RTD
I agree that Denver has a fair metro bus system,but to try to compare a metro area the size of Denver with one 10 times as big is unfair
Posted by bizofjim@...
20th Sep 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
San Francisco is famous for its CABLE CARS, not trolleys! Sheesh,
I live in Australia and I know that!

Have to agree with others; this article is kind of weird. LA has the
third largest public transport system in the US? I would have
thought it was the third smallest! Perhaps they are counting
taxis as part of it?
Posted by rahbm
22nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Top 10 cities for public transportation
Denver needs to drop their prices so that more people can ride the RTD
Posted by lhochan
4th Mar 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Worst city for public transportation
#1 Pittsburgh, pa US.
90 minutes waits confusing fare system, $3.25 one-way fares $1 transfers, Route changes every three months. The're Killing this once great city.
Posted by keef235
26th Apr 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Port Authority of Allegheny County Pennsylvania
PAT must have gone way downhill since we move to Denver in 1983. I thought back then it was adequate.
Posted by bizofjim@...
20th Sep 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Salt Lake City
It is no surprise that Salt Lake is higher than New York. UTA is how I get to school and it is nearly as fast as in a car.
Posted by Daniel3.7
21st Feb 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!