Follow this blog:
RSS

San Francisco’s new green building law requires energy audits

By | February 21, 2011, 6:01 PM PST

Non-residential buildings in San Francisco will now be held accountable to the public for how much energy they use.

The Existing Commercial Building Energy Performance Ordinance was signed by San Francisco’s mayor, Edwin Lee, last Friday, and will require that existing commercial buildings make their energy-usage reports available to the public annually. The new city code also requires that buildings over 10,000 square feet complete an energy efficiency audit every five years.

“San Francisco needs to increase the energy and resource efficiency of existing buildings if we are going to meet our aggressive greenhouse gas reduction targets,” Mayor Lee said in a statement. “This new green building code will educate building owners about what they need to do to save energy and money, and boost our local green economy.”

The city’s climate action plan — adopted in 2002 — aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

The city’s new code falls in line with President Barack Obama’s Better Buildings Initiative, which the president announced earlier this month. Last year commercial buildings used about 20 percent of all energy in the U.S. The president, though, plans to make commercial buildings 20 percent more energy efficient over the next decade.

San Francisco, at least, is off to a good start.

Photo: xk1sv/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
7
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
RE: San Francisco's new green building law requires energy audits
Is anything being done about new commercial buildings or renovations? They should be made to produce less greenhouse gas emissions to start with. Hopefully the presidents tax credits will help companies looking to remodel or build to use a green commercial construction company.
Posted by Open MRI
22nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Why...
...just "non-residential"?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
22nd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
RE: San Francisco's new green building law requires energy audits
Why...

...just "non-residential"?

Because residential have their own standards. eg Energy Code which is adopted by many jurisdictions. Commercial buildings have tended to be much less overseen and regulated as far as energy standards are concerned.
Posted by Greenbau
23rd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Nah. My guess is...
...that "residents" vote. The last thing San Francisco's residents
need is something that makes their housing even more expensive.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
23rd Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Missing the greater impact.
If they mandated certain items on new residential construction, like solar hot water and solar powered external lighting, the cumulative impact would be huge.

Looking at what has become standard in new houses over the past decade, even through the recession, I say we should make them sacrifice the granite counter tops and Italian tile floors for some solar panels in their next new house. The final price tag would be the same.
Posted by Hates Idiots
24th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
But as we both know HI...
...for most people, being "green" mainly means sacrifices to be
made by other people. That was my point above. They're happy to
make the law only apply to greedy corporations, but not directly to
themselves.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
25th Feb 2011
0 Votes
+ -
Do as I say, not as I do.
That is why I love when all this stuff comes out of California.

Most of the state is inhospitable. Artificial means of cooling the homes and bringing in water are the only reason there is such a large population there.

Pull the plug on the out of state water and power subsidies and they would be running for the exits.

Their whole way of life is artificial and by their own definitions, unsustainable.
Posted by Hates Idiots
25th Feb 2011
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!