Follow this blog:
RSS

Ruin porn

By | June 14, 2012, 3:00 AM PDT

Can't Forget the Motor City: Detroit (photograph by Brian Widdis)

Can't Forget the Motor City: Detroit (photograph by Brian Widdis)

Images of urban decay, loss, dilapidation, and disinvestment - images that detail the passing of time - have reached pornographic status, at least, linguistically speaking.

“Ruin porn worships the 33,000 empty houses and 91,000 vacant lots of Detroit,” writes Pete Brook at Wired.  “It overlooks the 700,000+ residents. It doesn’t come close to describing the city.”

Photographers Brian Widdis and Romain Blanquart are trying to change that. Can’t Forget Motor City is an online photography project telling a pointedly different Detroit story.

Can't Forget the Motor City: Detroit (photograph by Romain Blanquart)

Can't Forget the Motor City: Detroit (photograph by Romain Blanquart)

“The global media and many visiting photographers see Detroit as an abandoned and dead city,” Widdis and Blanquart write in their artist statement. “We are shown picture after picture of our modern ruins, buildings that were once the pride of our city. What is constantly absent from these soulless images are the people.”

But not everyone agrees that ruin porn is “soulless”. In fact, calling visual subjects of decay and dilapidation “porn” might be more provocative than meaningful.

Do the iconic images of Detroit Disassembled by Andrew Moore and The Ruins of Detroit by Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre unfairly abandon a city not yet dead?

Urban researcher Richey Piiparinen thinks not.

“I don’t feel the modern ruins littering the Rust Belt landscape are a negative,” writes Piiparinen for Rust Wire. “Rather, I feel cities like Cleveland and Detroit that have physically borne the brunt of a broken system are also home to something else: a possibility tied to the ubiquity of so many vacant and crumbled things.”

A resident of Cleveland himself, Piiparinen urges residents to wink at each other in self-confidence instead of making self-flagellating comments about the state of the Rust Belt.

“Because that America of Times Square and Texas growth is an illusion that is barely keeping itself from falling apart,” writes Piiparinen. “Whereas the Rust Belt has been able to stare at the pieces of a broken paradigm for some time now.”

"Ballroom, Lee Plaza Hotel" The Ruins of Detroit by Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre

"Atrium, Farwell Building" The Ruins of Detroit by Yves Marchand and Romain Meffre

Can't Forget the Motor City: Detroit (photograph by Romain Blanquart)

Piiparinen says, “Ruin Porn—or the artistic movement centered on photographing the scenes of post-industrial decay— has been called a lot by many. It has been referred to as condescending to Rust Belters. It has been called a necessary evil. It has been called masturbating-the-eye art.  I call it a breath of fresh air, or more exactly: a tool for a change in perception.”

In the end, whether ruin porn is condescending or not, it has definitely had it’s artistic heyday.

“Yes, there are empty houses and factories and yes, there are urban farmers with conviction and energy. But on a day-to-day basis, most citizens are barely affected by either of those extremes,” says Widdis.

And while Can’t Forget Motor City is trying to transcend the clichés of Rust Belt photography projects, Widdis and Blanquart recognize that a Detroit photography project is something of a clichés in and of itself.

“Detroit is close to bankruptcy, unemployment is stubbornly high, and a shrinking tax base has left the city struggling to provide basic services,” says Widdis. “There’s a plan to turn off the power to half of the city’s streetlights! So it’s not surprising that in 2012, four years after the auto bailout, housing bubble, and countless news stories about ‘The Ruins of Detroit’ (or its opposite ‘Detroit is Actually Not That Bad’), a kind of ‘Detroit Project’ fatigue has set in.”

Let SmartPlanet know what you think. Is there still a place for ruin worship? Is it naive to see images of decay as symbols of change? Is it fair to call ruin porn “soulless”?

Check out these related articles:

Is your city dying?

Detroit lets the state step in

The happiest cities in the world

Neighborlands unite! A social network gives power to the people

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Rachel James

About Rachel James

Rachel James is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Rachel James

Rachel James

Contributing Editor

Rachel James is a radio documentary producer and multimedia journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. She has worked with Radiolab and This American Life, contributed to WNYC's Talk To Me, Down East Magazine, KALW's Crosscurrents and the Third Coast International Audio Festival. She holds a degree from the University of Toronto and is a graduate of the radio program at the Salt Institute for Documentary Studies.

Follow her on Twitter.

Rachel James

Rachel James

Rachel does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
This is really an issue?
Should we have a gentleman's agreement between ourselves NOT to show stuff like this?

Or, should there be a white paper from the news industry "recommending against" this?

Or, even better: perhaps local, state, or federal edicts--or LAWS, even--banning such photography, and such stories. Should it be a misdemeanor? A felony?

Be serious.

If you're running a manufacturing shop, and trying to get a grasp of why your parts are failing, you DON'T hide the problems. You look at them front and center, and try to figure out how to make the necessary improvements. This is no different.

I would think, however, that with these "ruin porn" images, you still need to get the PEOPLE in them to sign appropriate release forms.

So...HOW is this an issue?
Posted by boothby171
Updated - 14th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
Agreed; They are really over-thinking this.
Personally, when I see such images, I think about the people who built those structures, and those who lived and worked in them. And then I wonder what happened to them, and the reasons that led to their abandonment. Is that bad?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
14th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
you miss the point
I don't think anyone mentioned any kind of censorship. But there is a fetish for decayed and abandoned spaces not balanced by images of life right now, or even of buildings or streets with people in them. It's too easy to fall for the false nostalgia and gritty sensuousness of our cities' ruins. And I'm not sure how that self-indulgence leads us to "make the necessary improvements" as you say. Really?
Posted by msbook
14th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
Quite frankly, you can say that about almost all of our popular media.
Just take a quick look at your local or cable tv lineup at any time of the day. Or look at most of the movies at your local megaplex, or those that are available for rent at your local kiosk. The vast majority of programming features social decay and abandonment along with themes of "false nostalgia and gritty sensuousness". The wife and I call most of it "psychic pollution", and we generally try to avoid it. It adds nothing positive to our existence, and it depresses us to think that millions of people drown themselves in it daily.

Looking at actual pictures of abandoned buildings seems pretty benign by comparison.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 14th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
This isn't new.
Photographers have been fascinated by industrial ruins for at least 30 years. Heck, I've been known to look for a hole in the fence surrounding abandoned industrial sites with camera in hand for many years.
Posted by CodeCurmudgeon
14th Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
How one can view this depends on the artist perspective.
I have seen displays of this kind of art where the descriptions written by the photographers are touching comments on the changes in society that led to the abandonment of the building. Statements filled with a longing for better days.

Other more condescending photographers make wild statements of failed capitalism and how this would never happen in a fair society because wasteful buildings would never be built.

Well I have news for those kinds of people. The former Eastern Bloc nations are full of Soviet era grandness that crumbled under an unsustainable FAIRNESS driven society. Fairness was driving a majority of the population into poverty while a shrinking minority gained wealth through corrupt government policies.

Sound familiar to what has happened the last 3 years in the US?

Middle class net worth has dropped over 40 percent in 3 years while the top 1 percent get richer.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 15th Jun
+2 Votes
+ -
The problem is that "fairness" is subjective...
...and totally dependent upon the viewpoint of the observer. I know plenty of people who'd consider the last 3 years very fair. The problem is that they are neither anything near the majority, or people we'd have much agreement with.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
15th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
capitalism v authoritarianism
HI wrote: "Other more condescending photographers make wild statements of failed capitalism and how this would never happen in a fair society because wasteful buildings would never be built."

Yes. Most Americans will not have visited Detroit or other decaying US sites (eg. East St Louis). At least this brings it to more people who really need to know how unsentimental laissez faire capitalism works and what the endpoint can be. As a non-American I happened to visit Detroit decades ago and was given a personal tour. I have lived, worked and visited all over the world and have never seen anything remotely as devastated or abandoned as the mile after mile after mile of burnt out shops and decrepit abandoned houses. Nor even what you can see of East St Louis looking across the Mississippi from that fancy rotating restaurant at the top of a building on the riverfront of St Louis. I haven't spent much time in Russia but didn't see anything equivalent, however I can believe it might exist. They have their excuses, namely 70 years of brutal authoritarianism.
On the other hand the rest of the developed world doesn't allow this to happen. Look at East Germany after reuniting with the West. Perhaps there are still decrepit patches left but Germany put several trillions into the unification. Even the clapped out old industrial (and sometimes still bomb-damaged from WW2) in England has been rejuvenated or at least attempted.

And so it is not a bad idea for citizens of the richest country in the world to see this. How can you retain your self-respect as a country and allow this, or Katrina aftermath for that matter. Apart from that aspect, do people think you just keep accumulating the failed detritus of capitalism, just walk away from it, until what ... is left?
For the rest of us it can be both beautiful and salutary.
Posted by rhodez
16th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
One of the best features of "capitalism" is "creative destruction"...
...where the unneeded or disused is abandoned instead of being forcibly kept alive for the sake of just keeping alive, which is what "authoritarianism" tends to do.

But again, I'd argue that Detroit's problem wasn't "capitalism", but the lack of it. It was "authoritarianism" that ultimately destroyed what was great about Detroit. The impetus and wealth that created the now decayed objects of those images moved on to greener pastures. And without the wealth that capitalism creates, the authoritarians are unable to save anything; not even themselves.

Why don't we have this same discussion about the millions of people who travel to Greece or Rome to look over the ruins of previous great nations? Are they too suffering a moral crisis and don't know it?
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 16th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
You should visit Chicago.
The Sears folly is a great example.

Sears had a huge complex of low warehouse and office buildings covering hundreds of acres in several areas across Chicago until the 1970s.

The warehouses had ready train access with direct boxcar loading that made it possible for Sears to sell everything from pots and pans to homes and bridges from a catalog.

The trains efficiently moved tons of products a day to regional and local distribution points across the nation where items were then shipped locally by wagon and later trucks to stores or peoples homes.

In the 1960s and 1970s politicians fell in love with highways while trains fell out of favor. The Chicago Daley political machine was no exception.

They convinced Sears to build downtown and walk away from dozens of city blocks of buildings across the city. Many of them were still vacant 20 years later on my first visit to Chicago in 1992.

The unexpected impact was a complete rebuild of the Sears distribution system. The lost efficiency of the train distribution system continues to hurt Sears bottom line today.

This was a classic case of politics over good business. A case study for a long sad trend across much of the US in the 1960s and 1970s that cities and businesses are still recovering from.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 21st Jun
+1 Vote
+ -
In the eye of the beholder
I've photographed abandoned and forgotten buildings for years, not only in distressed cities like Detroit, but also in less despairing locales such as New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, London, and Paris (yes, kids, entire neighborhoods of decaying industrial and residential buildings can be found in all of those places and many more).

Am I making a social or political "statement" whenever I click the shutter? Absolutely not. I simply find interesting old architecture -- with its eroded brickwork, rusted metal, fading signage, and encroaching natural vegetation -- visually beautiful. They just don't make 'em like that anymore.

Far more photographers -- both amateur and professional -- endlessly take (and obsessively post online) shots of their dogs, the sporting events they attend, the food they eat in restaurants, the National Parks they visit, or the wacky things they gawked at on the streets of Manhattan during their last vacation.

Are their photos dismissed as Pet Porn, Sports Porn, Menu Porn, Scenery Porn, or New York City Porn? Hardly. It's just stuff they like to photograph. Nothing more.

Generally, the same can be said for those who photograph urban ruins. They find them interesting, atmospheric, and even beautiful. Non-appreciators find such subject matter unappealing, downright ugly, and (by bizarre extension, I suppose) dirty. "Why would a normal person want to take a picture of THAT?" Hence the "porn" designation. Which is why some critics, through knee-jerk reaction, dismiss it completely.
Posted by EastCleveland
Updated - 24th Jun
0 Votes
+ -
This isn't porn, it is the most beautiful art
This is what we get when they ignore the humanities in school.

Twenty-first century people are supposed to be intelligent and educated, but we still don't know the difference between art/beauty and porn. For years, we have seen art called porn. Now we have art and beauty being called porn. Perhaps you recall a startling incident in Denmark a few years ago, when several million dollars worth of art was destroyed by the government which mistook it for porn.

These structures are eerily, etherially, eternally beautiful in their own way, even though the masses of sensory-deprived students coming out of our government schools/cloning institutions have never learned to appreciate anything that doesn't have Television's stamp of approval.

Wake up, people. As Shakespeare once wrote, "There are greater things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."

I love these forsaken places. We own a debt of gratitude to those who have preserved them on film.
Posted by fearlesscrusader
1st Apr
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!