Follow this blog:
RSS

New biomass-powered train to travel at 130 m.p.h.

By | May 26, 2012, 7:18 AM PDT


If the Twin Cities-based Coalition for Sustainable Rail (CSR) has anything to do with it, trains will soon run carbon-neutral.

This week, the Coalition, a project of the University of Minnesota’s Institute on Environment, teamed up with Sustainable Rail International, a non-profit advocacy group, to announce the launch of an initiative to build the world’s fastest biofuel-powered steam locomotive.

If successful, the prototype won’t just be carbon-neutral; it will also eclipse the current steam locomotive world record by traveling at 130 m.p.h.: providing a compelling alternative to diesel-electric trains used today.

“This project presents a novel approach to U.S. locomotive development,” said Davidson Ward, president of SRI, “looking to technologies of the past to inspire solutions for today’s sustainability challenges.”

Paving the way for the project was the creation of torrefied biomass, a carbon-neutral coal substitute. Engineered by the University of Minnesota’s Natural Resources Research Institute, the new fuel has the same energy, density, and material properties as coal — without the sulfur, metals, or carbon footprint.

If those involved have anything to do with it, the project’s impact will extend far beyond the creation of a successful prototype.

“Once perfected, creating the world’s first carbon-neutral locomotive will be just the beginning for this technology which, we hope, will later be used for combined heat and power energy in the developing world as well as reducing the United States’ dependence on fossil fuels,” said Rod Larkins, Special Projects Director of the University’s Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment.

Mr. Conductor would be very proud.

Photo: Vestman/Flickr

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Claire Lambrecht

About Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht

Contributing Editor

Claire Lambrecht is a freelance journalist based in Brooklyn, New York. She has written for the New York Times, Slate, Salon, Guernica and CBS MoneyWatch. Previously, she served as a Fulbright ETA and Teach For America corps member. She holds degrees from Cornell University and the University of Hawaii and is pursuing another from New York University.

Follow her on Twitter.

Claire Lambrecht

Claire Lambrecht

Claire does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
4
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
This was bound to make a comeback.
This is a modern twist on an old school fuel. Before coal became popular, wood was used in steam engines. Most of the big rail companies owned huge forests to ensure a steady supply of wood for both rail ties and fuel.

Though not as fast as the UKs A4s, US built steam engines in the 1940s ran the Boston to NY City to Washington DC route in times that would shame the Acela.

I will bet if they used a modern bio pellet fueled power plant could easily beat the world record set in 1938 while being far more efficient in the process.

http://www.squidoo.com/the-mallard

Now the problem becomes, where to run the trains? The US ripped up thousands of miles of express rails in the 1960s and 1970s. Only a handful remain in service mostly out west.

There in lies the problem for Acela making it a billion dollar waste of money. Built for speed and no where to go.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 29th May
+1 Vote
+ -
RE: Comeback
Track maintenance now is pitiful..no where near the degree it was during steam. Steam does pound the rails much harder...but the power is so much more efficient. There will have to be a lot of improvements made in the track systems that are left in order to take advantage of steam. I'm guessing balance on the drivers and links will be much better - perhaps not pounding as bad. Never-the-less I hope they experience wild success.

Funny, the loss of the highball express tracks is becoming similar to all of the trolly and express inter-urban tracks that were paved over and now the billions of dollars that are being used to replace them...and in the areas where there is light rail, no one rides and it's bleeding money... However I think that freight will be much different...
Posted by GregGold
29th May
+1 Vote
+ -
So true on the trolley and inter-urban tracks.
At one point in time you could board a trolley in southern NH near the Massachusetts state line and be in Provincetown on the tip of Cape Cod 4 hours later.

This past weekend people sat in 4 hour, 15 mile long backups just getting onto and 3 days later getting off of Cape Cod. Add in the hour it took to get to P-town once on the Cape and another 3 hours of traffic from NH and you are looking at 8 hours driving to make the trip a train did in 4 hours.

Efforts to bring back the trains have been stopped because most of the railbed on the Cape is now a hiking trail.
Posted by Hates Idiots
Updated - 29th May
0 Votes
+ -
This was bound to make a comeback.
This is a modern twist on an old school fuel. Before coal became popular, wood was used in steam engines. Most of the big rail companies owned huge forests to ensure a steady supply of wood for both rail ties and fuel.
I will bet if they used a modern bio pellet fueled power plant could easily beat the world record set in 1938 while being far more efficient in the process.
Posted by babaluuu
17th Mar
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!