Follow this blog:
RSS

In a blackout, power your home with your car?

By | July 9, 2012, 8:00 PM PDT

When millions of people in the eastern United States lost power for days earlier this month it’s unlikely anyone thought about using their car to revive their electricity. Not that it would have mattered for this incident. But in the future, new technology could help power your house using an electric car during these emergencies.

It’s technology that’s already being sold in Tokyo by Nissan, ABC New reports. Known as LEAF to Home, an EV Power Supply System developed by Nichicon, this system can use the all-electric Nissan LEAF to power a residential home and vice versa. With a lithium-ion battery capacity of 24kW, the battery, on full charge, can power a typical Japanese home, which uses about 10-12kW of electricity per day, for about two days — in the U.S. that number is around 30kW/day. Currently the innovative power station costs about 330,000 yen (over $4,000).

The system would come in handy during an emergency, but the product isn’t just for those concerned with power loss. According to Nissan, your home could switch to the battery power in your car during peak electricity use. This would eleviate stress on the power grid and prevent blackouts and grid instability. Or, you could generate your own electricity with solar or wind power, store it in the car battery during the day, and use it to power your home in the evening.

Photo courtesy of Nissan

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Tyler Falk

About Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Contributing Editor

Tyler Falk freelance journalist based in Washington, D.C. Previously, he was with Smart Growth America and Grist. He holds a degree from Goshen College.

Follow him on Twitter.

Tyler Falk

Tyler Falk

Tyler does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Who wants to use a car as a stationary UPS?
While all this sounds wonderful on paper, most people want to use their car during the day. This means it will be at work, out on shopping trips, or taking the kids around. While the good news is that the car can be charged at night when rates are lower, for most people it won't be in the garage much of the day to reduce peak usage when rates are high. Also, using it this way will wear out the batteries sooner, necessitating a costly battery pack replacement. When you factor in this cost, you may not be saving so much by using your car as a household load balancing device.

In the case of an emergency when the power goes out for more than a few minutes, it would indeed be nice to have this backup power. But really, how often does that happen?
Posted by zackers
11th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
It might be more useful...
...To use retired auto batteries as backup power rather than the one in the car. If someone had wind or solar or were producing hydrogen via electrolysis, a battery that was actually there during the day might be pretty useful.
Posted by ShockMe
11th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
Although the idea of having this resource available in an emergency...
...is appealing, applying it as a fixture of the grid is silly. For one thing, batteries are cycle-limited; they wear out with each charge-discharge cycle. Considering that attaching my EV's battery to the grid would greatly accelerate it's eventual demise and and replacing those batteries is extremely expensive, I'd never consider doing so. I seriously doubt that my utility would be willing to pay me what it would ultimately cost to provide this service.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
11th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
This is naive - like the Windpower argument
Naive trendy lefty enviro people thought wind power could replace baseload power as soon as its costs were comparable. Now they are waking up to the fact that even if the costs were comparable (they are not, they only appear to be so due to subsidies) you would still need to double the cost due to the need to instal backup conventional power plant, standing by to cover the situation of peak electricity demand when the wind inconveniently doesn't happen to be blowing.

Ditto problem for using an electric car battery to power the home in an emergency: if the car is used by the family it is as likely as not to be discharged (or out on the road) exactly when it is needed.

And all at an installation cost of a mere $4000? I don't think so.

Duh!
Posted by cosserat@...
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
It's hardly a new realization.
My first professional programming gig over 30 years ago was for a wind project. Out of the gate, the base load problem was clear and everyone involved knew it. But it didn't matter to anyone involved because the whole boondoggle was being fueled by the tax code.

I have to wonder where we'd be today if we had instead been working on the storage and base load problems instead of building windmills that were never used to their potential.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
12th Jul
0 Votes
+ -
This Blog has been taken over by Ostriches
Dear Luddites,

Our world is changing around us. We now utilize energy to perform every single task that once required man/horse power. At one time, only 5% of the earth's inhabitants used energy this way. Now 25% intensively use energy and the other 75% would like to. Energy reserves are rapidly dwindling and shortly demand will outstrip production.

As a species who knows it knows, or at least most of us, we can plan ahead, adverting disaster. Just because alternatives are not financially viable doesn't mean we shouldn't develop them. Going to the moon wasn't financially viable, but hundreds of modern technologies came out of this process.

How much closer would we be to energy self sufficiency if we spent the money we used to fight Middle Eastern terrorist in Iraq and Afghanistan on developing renewable energies?
Government spending has always been used to bridge need and commercial viability. A majority of technology is first developed and utilized by the military, which is governmental spending, and then passed to private industry.

Wake up and smell the fuel vapors. We can't continue polluting our environment for short term gain. Oil and gas production has hundreds of billions of dollars of hidden cost that are not directly paid by the consumer; road construction and maintenance, pollution, health related cost due to pollution, military spending to protect oil access, habitat destruction (both man and animal), etc.

As a country we need to make a commitment to energy self sufficiency, which by necessity requires renewable energy technologies; such as wind, solar, hydro electric, geo-thermal, battery storage, etc. Stop being pithy, na saying, know-it-alls and start putting forth solutions. If you are not part of the solution you are part of the problem!!!! OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN DESERVER CLEAN AIR AND WATER!!! Stop blaming liberals and look within yourself.
Sincerely,

A moderate citizen who advocates renewable energy technologies and political reform
Posted by JT4
17th Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!